 |
 |

The Annual Examination: A Touchstone for Contextualized Care
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Prochazka et al1 address the lack of evidence for the annual examination. In the accompanying editorial, the authors ask if physicians and patients might be telling us something by their preference for it.2
As one of the first 16 physicians recognized for both cardiovascular prevention and diabetes care by the National Committee for Quality Assurance, as a member of a clinic whose patient satisfaction was ranked top 10 in the nation, and as a physician committed to patient-centered quality, what I would tell is this: I structure my entire practice around the annual examination. It is when I address prevention, coach patients on healthy lifestyles, and do the annual review of each chronic medical condition. Invariably, patients bring new symptoms for evaluation as well. It is a complex visit, focused on integrated, longitudinal care.
One can dissect the endeavor and point to the lack of evidence for listening to the . . . [Full Text of this Article] AUTHOR INFORMATION
Christine A. Sinsky, MD
RELATED ARTICLES
The Annual Physical: Are Physicians and Patients Telling Us Something?
Patrick G. OMalley and Philip Greenland
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(12):1333-1334.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Support of Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Annual Physical Examination: A Survey of Primary Care Providers
Allan V. Prochazka, Kristy Lundahl, Wesley Pearson, Sylvia K. Oboler, and Robert J. Anderson
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(12):1347-1352.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Treating Diabetic Nephropathy: Unfinished Success Is Not Failure
Lewis
CJASN 2007;2:407-409.
FULL TEXT
Renoprotection by blocking the RAAS in diabetic nephropathy--fact or fiction?
Rossing et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:2354-2357.
FULL TEXT
Renin Angiotensin System Blockade and Nephropathy: Why Is It Being Called into Question, and Should It Be?
Hollenberg and Epstein
CJASN 2006;1:1046-1048.
FULL TEXT
|