This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on ISI (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Quality of Care, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

While we admire Dr Wartofsky's work in hypothyroidism, his editorial¹ is reminiscent of the criticism that Louis² received when he first demonstrated that blood-letting lacked benefit in pneumonia. Medicine came late to the scientific revolution, and its thought was still dominated by deductive reasoning. "We have known since Aristotle that fevers are caused by too much red blood . . . " the argument would begin and then it would be deductively reasoned that since pneumonias were febrile diseases, they would respond to phlebotomy. There was no need to check actual patients to see if that were true. As Spinoza noted, reality was too deceptive to yield the truth. Axioms and general laws had been left by the Ancients, and it was only through philosophy and deductive reasoning that we could discover the truth. Isaac Newton had moved other sciences into inductive reasoning, but medicine somewhat reluctantly dragged itself into modern science. The legal . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION
Charles J. Diskin, MD

RELATED ARTICLES

A Change of Reason: Medicine and the Scientific Revolution—Reply
Leonard Wartofsky
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(3):370.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Levothyroxine Therapy for Hypothyroidism: Should We Abandon Conservative Dosage Titration?
Leonard Wartofsky
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(15):1683-1684.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT