You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 166 No. 6, March 27, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Physical Examination
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Diagnosis
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Time, Now, to Recover the Fun in the Physical Examination Rather Than Abandon It

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:603-604.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

I do not believe a time ever existed when clinicians believed that their physical examination skills were ideal and did not need improvement. Nor do I think there has ever been a time when clinicians did not lament the skills of their trainees. What is different now is that the advent of high-quality clinical examination research, driven by the evidence-based medicine movement, converts the transparency of our deficits to the "full monty." It is possible that our skills are no worse than ever, but our awareness has improved.

Our obsessive dependence on diagnostic technology that generates data with alluring precision may ultimately create real erosion of our physical diagnosis skills. We can prevent this degradation only if we remember that improved performance requires the time to practice skills repetitively under the guidance of great mentors who reinforce and ensure correct techniques. The Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION
David L. Simel, MD, MHS



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Competency in Cardiac Examination Skills in Medical Students, Trainees, Physicians, and Faculty: A Multicenter Study
Jasminka M. Vukanovic-Criley, Stuart Criley, Carole Marie Warde, John R. Boker, Lempira Guevara-Matheus, Winthrop Hallowell Churchill, William P. Nelson, and John Michael Criley
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(6):610-616.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship Between Accurate Auscultation of a Clinically Useful Third Heart Sound and Level of Experience
Gregory Marcus, Joshua Vessey, Mark V. Jordan, Michele Huddleston, Barry McKeown, Ivor L. Gerber, Elyse Foster, Kanu Chatterjee, Charles E. McCulloch, and Andrew D. Michaels
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(6):617-622.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.