 |
 |

Time, Now, to Recover the Fun in the Physical Examination Rather Than Abandon It
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:603-604.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
I do not believe a time ever existed when clinicians believed that their physical examination skills were ideal and did not need improvement. Nor do I think there has ever been a time when clinicians did not lament the skills of their trainees. What is different now is that the advent of high-quality clinical examination research, driven by the evidence-based medicine movement, converts the transparency of our deficits to the "full monty." It is possible that our skills are no worse than ever, but our awareness has improved.
Our obsessive dependence on diagnostic technology that generates data with alluring precision may ultimately create real erosion of our physical diagnosis skills. We can prevent this degradation only if we remember that improved performance requires the time to practice skills repetitively under the guidance of great mentors who reinforce and ensure correct techniques. The Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations . . . [Full Text of this Article] AUTHOR INFORMATION
David L. Simel, MD, MHS
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Competency in Cardiac Examination Skills in Medical Students, Trainees, Physicians, and Faculty: A Multicenter Study
Jasminka M. Vukanovic-Criley, Stuart Criley, Carole Marie Warde, John R. Boker, Lempira Guevara-Matheus, Winthrop Hallowell Churchill, William P. Nelson, and John Michael Criley
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(6):610-616.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Relationship Between Accurate Auscultation of a Clinically Useful Third Heart Sound and Level of Experience
Gregory Marcus, Joshua Vessey, Mark V. Jordan, Michele Huddleston, Barry McKeown, Ivor L. Gerber, Elyse Foster, Kanu Chatterjee, Charles E. McCulloch, and Andrew D. Michaels
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(6):617-622.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|