This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Bacterial Infections  • Infectious Diseases, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic

Joseph Steven Cervia, MD; Frank Canonica, PhD; Girolomo Ortolano, PhD

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The timely analysis by Albrecht and colleagues¹ sheds appropriate light on the disturbing reemergence of gram-negative bacteria as agents of health care–associated bloodstream infections. As the authors aptly describe, such infections exact a devastating toll in morbidity and mortality and add substantially to the cost of patient care. Interestingly, some of the most frequently isolated gram-negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas and Enterobacter, have been found to persist in hospital water for extended periods and have been responsible for nosocomial outbreaks.² In fact, a recent review of prospective studies published between 1998 and 2005 indicated that between 9.7% and 68.1% of random intensive care unit water samples were positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and between 14.2% and 50% of patient infections were due to genotypes found in intensive care unit water.³

Recent scientific evidence illustrates the importance of biofilm in allowing . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION