You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 167 No. 13, July 9, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Arrhythmias
 •Adverse Effects
 •Diabetes Mellitus
 •Hypertension
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

COMMENTS & OPINIONS
Antihypertensive-Associated Incident Diabetes: Controversy Persists

Ajay K. Gupta, MD, MSc; Neil R. Poulter, MD, MSc, FRCP

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The study by Barzilay et al1 reconfirms that thiazide-like diuretics are associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes compared with other antihypertensive agents and that incident diabetes is associated with increased risk of all cardiovascular events and significantly so for coronary heart disease. However the authors of these analyses suggest that diuretic-associated incident diabetes may be "innocent." If true, this would be a surprising observation with important clinical implications and therefore merits careful examination.

As the authors point out, this is a post hoc analysis of nonrandomized data with only 53% of the eligible "nondiabetic" patients having 1 or more measurement of fasting glucose. Those excluded were biased toward blacks and women who are more prone to diabetes and/or risk of diabetes-related cardiovascular outcomes, respectively. The definition of incident diabetes used (a single measurement of fasting glucose > 125 . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Fasting Glucose Levels and Incident Diabetes Mellitus in Older Nondiabetic Adults Randomized to Receive 3 Different Classes of Antihypertensive Treatment: A Report From the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)
Joshua I. Barzilay, Barry R. Davis, Jeffrey A. Cutler, Sara L. Pressel, Paul K. Whelton, Jan Basile, Karen L. Margolis, Stephen T. Ong, Laurie S. Sadler, John Summerson, and for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(20):2191-2201.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Determinants of New-Onset Diabetes Among 19,257 Hypertensive Patients Randomized in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm and the Relative Influence of Antihypertensive Medication
Gupta et al.
Diabetes Care 2008;31:982-988.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.