 |
 |

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
Prisoners (Should) Count
Robert G. Newman, MD, MPH
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 124 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
It is difficult to understand a survey of injection drug users1 that ignores "institutionalized persons," including, specifically, prisoners. The comment of the author that the excluded individuals "represent less than 2% of the US population"1(p166) gives scant comfort. The incarcerated population in the United States numbers more than 2.3 million persons,2 and a significant proportion of the inmates are injection drug users.
What could be the reason for excluding a cohort that includes so many of the individuals whose characteristics are being studied—especially when those individuals are, very literally, a captive population?
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Correspondence: Dr Newman, Baron Edmond de Rothschild Chemical Dependency Institute, Beth Israel Medical Center, 555 W 57th St, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10019 (rnewman@icaat.org).
1. Armstrong GL. Injection Drug Users in the United States, 1979-2002. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(2):166-173.
FREE FULL TEXT
2. Harrison PM, Beck AJ. US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prisoners in 2005. Washington, DC: US Dept of Justice; November 2006:1.
Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(16):1807.
RELATED LETTER
Prisoners (Should) Count—Reply
Gregory L. Armstrong
Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(16):1807-1808.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
Injection Drug Users in the United States, 1979-2002: An Aging Population
Gregory L. Armstrong
Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(2):166-173.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|