This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Patient-Physician Communication  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Larry J. Austin, DMin

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In their article, Curlin et al¹ point out that physicians are not just objective, neutral scientists but that their own ideas of religion and spirituality influence the way physicians respond to patients’ ideas of religion and spirituality.

I agree wholeheartedly with the research comments and conclusions. As a chaplain and certified supervisor of the Association of Clinical Pastoral Education (ACPE), I have taught many years using a process education model for ministers and chaplain trainees. Any educational process about communication with another has to deal with certain realities. A good clinician has to maintain clear boundaries between what he or she believes and what the client believes. A heightened awareness of one's own preconceived ideas and of course one's own biases and blind spots is essential for accurate communication and treatment. These issues and dynamics may be understood by understanding some of the basic terms of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Physicians' Observations and Interpretations of the Influence of Religion and Spirituality on Health
Farr A. Curlin, Sarah A. Sellergren, John D. Lantos, and Marshall H. Chin
Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(7):649-654.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT