You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 167 No. 4, February 26, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Controversies in Internal Medicine
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Dentistry/ Oral Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Case for Infectious Endocarditis Prophylaxis

Time to Move Forward

Todd B. Seto, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(4):327-330.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

INTRODUCTION

The concept of using antibacterial agents to prevent infectious endocarditis (IE) was proposed more than 60 years ago1 and was first endorsed by the American Heart Association (AHA) in its recommendations for IE prophylaxis published in 1955.2 Since that time, IE prophylaxis has become a widely accepted preventive measure, broadly endorsed by a number of international professional societies, representing cardiologists, gastroenterologists, infectious diseases specialists, dentists, and pediatricians.2

Like other rare illnesses, IE is difficult to study, and firm evidence establishing the benefit of prophylaxis has been elusive. Indeed, studies suggesting that IE prophylaxis is ineffective3-6 and carries a risk of adverse drug events,7 and increased bacterial resistance8 has prompted calls to revise the AHA recommendations and scale back its use.9 However, IE prophylaxis has become engrained in the minds of physicians, dentists, and their patients, and, although not its intent, the AHA recommendations for IE . . . [Full Text of this Article]

HIGH MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY OF IE

WE CAN IDENTIFY PATIENTS AT RISK FOR IE

WE CAN IDENTIFY HIGH-RISK PROCEDURES

ANTIBIOTICS DECREASE BACTEREMIA AND PREVENT IE

CONCLUSIONS

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Author Affiliations: Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, The Queen's Medical Center, and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii.


RELATED ARTICLE

Rebuttal
Andrew Mark Morris
Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(4):333-334.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.