You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 167 No. 4, February 26, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Controversies in Internal Medicine
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Dentistry/ Oral Medicine
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Coming Clean With Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Infective Endocarditis

Andrew Mark Morris, MD, MSc, FRCPC

Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(4):330-332.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

INTRODUCTION

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a potentially catastrophic disease that was uniformly fatal in the preantibiotic era, and it still carries an unacceptably high rate of morbidity and mortality. Such a sinister disease warrants attempts at prevention. However, prevention of IE with antibiotics is neither reasonable nor possible in the foreseeable future and results in considerable harm.

Several preconditions are necessary for antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) to be the right approach to IE prevention: First, inciting events must be identified as a target of prophylaxis. Second, a subset of the population at increased risk of developing IE and undergoing the inciting event must be identified. Third, a simple, efficacious, and effective method of AP must be identified. Finally, the resultant net health of the population receiving AP must be better than if they had not received it.

Researchers recognized long ago that organisms found in the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Author Affiliation: Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Rebuttal
Todd B. Seto
Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(4):333.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.