You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 167 No. 5, March 12, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Women's Health
 •Menopause
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

COMMENTS & OPINIONS
Alternatives for Menopause—Reply

Anne Nedrow, MD; Jill Miller, MD; Laurie Hoyt Huffman, MS; Peggy Nygren, MA; Miranda Walker, BA; Heidi D. Nelson, MD, MPH

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In reply

We acknowledge the substantial contributions of Ernst and Borelli in the field of complementary and alternative medicine over the past decades. We concur that inclusion of non-English literature is desirable, and applaud Borelli and Ernst1 for inclusion of such in their review of black cohosh in 2002. This is particularly important when reviewing a single therapy in which many of the trials are conducted in non–English-speaking countries. The English language limitation for our review was a required practical decision to limit the volume of literature to a manageable amount because we reviewed all complementary and alternative therapies used for the management of menopausal symptoms. Of note, the 4 clinical trials reviewed by Borelli and Ernst1 are referenced in our review2 and noted for their historical importance. Most . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.