You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 168 No. 12, June 23, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Controversies in Internal Medicine
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Emergency Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

A Hospitalist Inpatient System Does Not Improve Patient Care Outcomes

Robert M. Centor, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(12):1257-1258.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

INTRODUCTION

What is a hospitalist inpatient system? How do we define improving patient care outcomes (PCOs)? To what alternative are we comparing a hospitalist inpatient system?

We have been asked to debate a proposition that raises many questions. I submit that per se a hospitalist inpatient system does not improve PCOs. I will base my argument on several major points.


DEFINING HOSPITALIST SYSTEMS

First, hospitalist "systems" vary greatly among hospitals. We cannot evaluate hospitalist systems generically because of their great variation. Second, we must look at all outcomes. We cannot focus just on hospital outcomes; we must include long-term outcomes. The hospitalist model might have positive or negative effects on trust and satisfaction. Third, we must consider the relative importance of physician factors and system factors. We must include continuity factors—both in the hospital and across settings.

The first explicit discussion of the job description hospitalist came in the classic . . . [Full Text of this Article]

DEFINING PCOs

REDEFINING THE QUESTION

FOCUSING OUR EFFORTS

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Author Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Hospitalists and the Hospital Medicine System of Care Are Good for Patient Care
Mark V. Williams
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(12):1254-1256.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rebuttal
Mark V. Williams
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(12):1259.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rebuttal
Robert M. Centor
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(12):1260.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.