 |
 |

A Hospitalist Inpatient System Does Not Improve Patient Care Outcomes
Robert M. Centor, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(12):1257-1258.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
INTRODUCTION
What is a hospitalist inpatient system? How do we define improving patient care outcomes (PCOs)? To what alternative are we comparing a hospitalist inpatient system?
We have been asked to debate a proposition that raises many questions. I submit that per se a hospitalist inpatient system does not improve PCOs. I will base my argument on several major points.
DEFINING HOSPITALIST SYSTEMS
First, hospitalist "systems" vary greatly among hospitals. We cannot evaluate hospitalist systems generically because of their great variation. Second, we must look at all outcomes. We cannot focus just on hospital outcomes; we must include long-term outcomes. The hospitalist model might have positive or negative effects on trust and satisfaction. Third, we must consider the relative importance of physician factors and system factors. We must include continuity factors—both in the hospital and across settings.
The first explicit discussion of the job description hospitalist came in the classic . . . [Full Text of this Article]
DEFINING PCOs
REDEFINING THE QUESTION
FOCUSING OUR EFFORTS
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Author Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Hospitalists and the Hospital Medicine System of Care Are Good for Patient Care
Mark V. Williams
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(12):1254-1256.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Rebuttal
Mark V. Williams
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(12):1259.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Rebuttal
Robert M. Centor
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(12):1260.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|