This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Emergency Medicine  • Quality of Care, Other  • Medical Practice, Other  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Alert me on articles by topic

Robert M. Centor, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(12):1260.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Dr Williams has written an impassioned advertisement for hospital medicine. Unfortunately, he focuses mostly on studies that put hospitalists in a positive light. Not all studies share these findings.¹ We cannot exclude the problem of publication bias when we review studies looking at how hospitalists have an impact on patient care.

As I wrote in my original discussion, the phrase "hospitalist inpatient system" does not describe a homogeneous concept. Hospitalist groups vary in call structures and accessibility. Academic hospitalists often have very different responsibilities than community hospitalists. We need to understand the influence of these various systems on the measurement of hospitalist impact.

We also do not know how much the individual physicians affect patient care outcomes. I suspect that we all believe that some physicians consistently do a better job of patient care than do others.

We do know that hospitalists (in varied forms) have . . . [Full Text of this Article]

RELATED ARTICLES

Hospitalists and the Hospital Medicine System of Care Are Good for Patient Care
Mark V. Williams
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(12):1254-1256.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Hospitalist Inpatient System Does Not Improve Patient Care Outcomes
Robert M. Centor
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(12):1257-1258.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rebuttal
Mark V. Williams
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(12):1259.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT