You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 168 No. 12, June 23, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Controversies in Internal Medicine
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Emergency Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Rebuttal

Robert M. Centor, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(12):1260.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Dr Williams has written an impassioned advertisement for hospital medicine. Unfortunately, he focuses mostly on studies that put hospitalists in a positive light. Not all studies share these findings.1 We cannot exclude the problem of publication bias when we review studies looking at how hospitalists have an impact on patient care.

As I wrote in my original discussion, the phrase "hospitalist inpatient system" does not describe a homogeneous concept. Hospitalist groups vary in call structures and accessibility. Academic hospitalists often have very different responsibilities than community hospitalists. We need to understand the influence of these various systems on the measurement of hospitalist impact.

We also do not know how much the individual physicians affect patient care outcomes. I suspect that we all believe that some physicians consistently do a better job of patient care than do others.

We do know that hospitalists (in varied forms) have . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Hospitalist Care
Martin Terplan
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(2):205.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

Hospitalists and the Hospital Medicine System of Care Are Good for Patient Care
Mark V. Williams
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(12):1254-1256.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Hospitalist Inpatient System Does Not Improve Patient Care Outcomes
Robert M. Centor
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(12):1257-1258.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rebuttal
Mark V. Williams
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(12):1259.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.