You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 168 No. 15, Aug 11/25, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Diabetes Mellitus
 •Cardiac Diagnostic Tests
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
The Hurdles of Translating a Single-Center Observation Into Practice—Reply

Pamela N. Peterson, MD, MSPH; Frederick A. Masoudi, MD, MSPH

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In reply

We appreciate Testa and colleagues' comments regarding our article. As they point out, an underlying assumption of Cox survival models is the proportionality of hazards for the covariates.1 As stated in our article, we assessed the validity of this assumption for each of the covariates, including indication for testing, and found the assumption to be appropriate.2

With respect to the question about the adjustment for diabetes or medical therapy, these variables, in addition to all those in Table 1 of our article,2 were candidates for each of the models. As stated in the article, variable reduction for the final model was performed, removing those variables without a significant relationship with the outcome or that did not exert a meaningful confounding effect on the relationship between exercise tolerance and the outcome.2 Thus, the variables from Table 1 not included . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Association of Exercise Capacity on Treadmill With Future Cardiac Events in Patients Referred for Exercise Testing
Pamela N. Peterson, David J. Magid, Colleen Ross, P. Michael Ho, John S. Rumsfeld, Michael S. Lauer, Ella E. Lyons, Scott S. Smith, and Frederick A. Masoudi
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(2):174-179.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ability of Exercise Testing to Predict Cardiovascular and All-Cause Death in Asymptomatic Women: A 20-Year Follow-up of the Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study
Samia Mora, Rita F. Redberg, Yadong Cui, Maura K. Whiteman, Jodi A. Flaws, A. Richey Sharrett, and Roger S. Blumenthal
JAMA. 2003;290(12):1600-1607.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.