You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 168 No. 22, Dec 8/22, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Health Policy
 •Medical Ethics
 •Patient Education/ Health Literacy
 •Public Health, Other
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Quality of Life
 •Diabetes Mellitus
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
Population Health for the Patient With Diabetes—Reply

Paula M. Trief, PhD

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In reply

Flansbaum asks for information about interventions that will pass the "ethical ‘sniff test’ and assure the efficient use of taxpayer dollars." We proposed several alternative uses for the estimated $2.3 million spent on the New York City diabetes registry, but he questions the evidence supporting them. In fact, there is quite a bit of evidence supporting the benefits of various types of interventions both in terms of improving glycemic control and quality of life. Evidence supports diabetes education,1 training in self-management,2 various quality improvement strategies,3 and others. Evaluation of public policy interventions is best left to policy analysts. However, even if the diabetes registry is beneficial, the potential risks and ethical concerns we identify (eg, risks to patient autonomy, physician-patient relationships, adherence, discrimination, and confidentiality) are more than a "sniff test." We believe they must be at the heart of the discussion.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
Correspondence: Dr . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Mandated Diabetes Registries Will Not Benefit Persons With Diabetes
Paula M. Trief and Richard A. Ellison
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(8):799-802.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

Population Health for the Patient With Diabetes
Bradley Flansbaum
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(22):2498.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.