 |
 |

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
Population Health for the Patient With Diabetes—Reply
Paula M. Trief, PhD
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In reply
Flansbaum asks for information about interventions that will pass the "ethical sniff test and assure the efficient use of taxpayer dollars." We proposed several alternative uses for the estimated $2.3 million spent on the New York City diabetes registry, but he questions the evidence supporting them. In fact, there is quite a bit of evidence supporting the benefits of various types of interventions both in terms of improving glycemic control and quality of life. Evidence supports diabetes education,1 training in self-management,2 various quality improvement strategies,3 and others. Evaluation of public policy interventions is best left to policy analysts. However, even if the diabetes registry is beneficial, the potential risks and ethical concerns we identify (eg, risks to patient autonomy, physician-patient relationships, adherence, discrimination, and confidentiality) are more than a "sniff test." We believe they must be at the heart of the discussion.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Correspondence: Dr . . . [Full Text of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Mandated Diabetes Registries Will Not Benefit Persons With Diabetes
Paula M. Trief and Richard A. Ellison
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(8):799-802.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTER
Population Health for the Patient With Diabetes
Bradley Flansbaum
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(22):2498.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|