This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Medical Ethics  • Patient-Physician Communication  • End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine  • Patient-Physician Relationship, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic

Ernesto d’Aloja, MD, PhD; Michela Pintor, MD; Francesco Paribello, MD, PhD; Salvatore Pisu, MD

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Varma and Wendler¹ recently focused on the medical ethical challenge represented by the treatment for people lacking advanced directives or designated surrogates. They argue that it is fundamental to give them the same level of respect afforded those with surrogates. The clear identification of instruments to help physicians make treatment decisions consistent with the patient's preferences is mandatory. They propose a "population-based treatment indicator," a computer-based tool that should be able to unravel a patient's choice by relying on the treatment preference of comparable individuals. The data to be implemented into the decisional algorithm are mainly based on "age and sex, and features of the patient's clinical situation, such as diagnosis."^1(p1712)

We all know that the patient-physician relationship underwent an in-depth transformation over the last 50 years. The main achievement was the awareness that physicians cannot . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION

RELATED ARTICLE

Medical Decision Making for Patients Without Surrogates
Sumeeta Varma and David Wendler
Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(16):1711-1715.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT