You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 10, May 25, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Pain
 •Patient Education/ Health Literacy
 •Patient-Physician Relationship, Other
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Diagnosis
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
 •Radiography
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Imaging Idolatry

The Uneasy Intersection of Patient Satisfaction, Quality of Care, and Overuse

Richard A. Deyo, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(10):921-923.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Medical imaging is a growth industry. A 2008 report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) noted that in just 7 years, from 2000 through 2006, Medicare spending for imaging more than doubled to approximately $14 billion. Most of the growth was in advanced imaging such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.1 In the particular case of lumbar spine imaging, MR images covered by Medicare increased 307% between 1994 and 2005.2 The GAO linked spending growth, in part, to a shift of more advanced imaging from hospitals into physician offices. It also noted wide geographic variability in the use of imaging, "suggesting that not all utilization was necessary or appropriate."1(p5)

Spine imaging has come under particular scrutiny because both evidence and expert opinion suggest it is overused.3-5 On the one hand, the yield of unexpected findings is low: a 10-year Swedish study estimated . . . [Full Text of this Article]

PATIENT OUTCOMES


PATIENT SATISFACTION

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Rapidity and Modality of Imaging for Acute Low Back Pain in Elderly Patients
Hoangmai H. Pham, Bruce E. Landon, James D. Reschovsky, Beny Wu, and Deborah Schrag
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(10):972-981.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.