 |
 |

Imaging IdolatryThe Uneasy Intersection of Patient Satisfaction, Quality of Care, and Overuse
Richard A. Deyo, MD, MPH
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(10):921-923.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Medical imaging is a growth industry. A 2008 report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) noted that in just 7 years, from 2000 through 2006, Medicare spending for imaging more than doubled to approximately $14 billion. Most of the growth was in advanced imaging such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.1 In the particular case of lumbar spine imaging, MR images covered by Medicare increased 307% between 1994 and 2005.2 The GAO linked spending growth, in part, to a shift of more advanced imaging from hospitals into physician offices. It also noted wide geographic variability in the use of imaging, "suggesting that not all utilization was necessary or appropriate."1(p5)
Spine imaging has come under particular scrutiny because both evidence and expert opinion suggest it is overused.3-5 On the one hand, the yield of unexpected findings is low: a 10-year Swedish study estimated . . . [Full Text of this Article] PATIENT OUTCOMES
PATIENT SATISFACTION
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS
AUTHOR INFORMATION
CiteULike Connotea Delicious Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Rapidity and Modality of Imaging for Acute Low Back Pain in Elderly Patients
Hoangmai H. Pham, Bruce E. Landon, James D. Reschovsky, Beny Wu, and Deborah Schrag
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(10):972-981.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|