You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 13, July 13, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders
 •Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Other
 •Oncology
 •Oncology, Other
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Diagnosis
 •Computed Tomography
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Calcium Scoring With Computed Tomography

What Is the Radiation Risk?

Raymond J. Gibbons, MD; Thomas C. Gerber, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(13):1185-1187.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The critical appraisal of any medical test or strategy requires careful assessment of its potential risks, benefits, and costs. Accurate definition of the risks, benefits, and costs of the use of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning with computed tomography (CT) in asymptomatic individuals remains an elusive goal. In this issue of the Archives, Kim et al1 contribute to our knowledge about potential risks by reporting estimated radiation doses and excess lifetime risks of radiation-induced cancer from CAC scanning for a variety of CT scanners and scanning protocols that have been described in the literature. The authors report more than a 10-fold variation in effective radiation dose, from 0.8 to 10.5 mSv, with a median of 2.3 mSv. The data reflect well-established relationships between the specifics of CT scanner settings such as x-ray tube potential or tube current-time product on the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

NEED FOR A STANDARDIZED PROTOCOL


ESTIMATING HEALTH RISKS FROM LOW-DOSE IONIZING RADIATION EXPOSURE

BENEFIT OF CAC SCANNING FOR CARDIOVASCULAR RISK PREDICTION

IMPLICATIONS

AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Coronary Artery Calcification Screening: Estimated Radiation Dose and Cancer Risk
Kwang Pyo Kim, Andrew J. Einstein, and Amy Berrington de González
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(13):1188-1194.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.