 |
 |

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
Changing the Diabetes Treatment Paradigm
Ronald Hirsch, MD
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
As an internist with a busy office practice and a large number of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, I was flabbergasted to read the Commentary by Havas1 on the lack of evidence supporting pharmacologic control of blood glucose levels and his recommendation that metformin be the sole oral agent used. Achieving a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level below 7.0% is considered the sole measure of adequate diabetic control, and failure to achieve that mark is considered failure to adequately care for the patient. In fact, Medicare has included HbA1c control as one of its core measures for diabetes care in the recently enacted Physician Quality Reporting Initiative.2 Patients are routinely treated with multiple oral agents at a great expense, which only increases when we add injectable agents to the mix to achieve that elusive goal of an HbA1c level less than 7.0%. They endure adverse effects . . . [Full Text of this Article] AUTHOR INFORMATION
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
The ACCORD Trial and Control of Blood Glucose Level in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Time to Challenge Conventional Wisdom
Stephen Havas
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(2):150-154.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTERS
Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: One Extreme to Another
Sarfraz Zaidi
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(13):1246-1247.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: One Extreme to Another—Reply
Stephen Havas
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(13):1247.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|