You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 14, July 27, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Tuberculosis/ Other Mycobacterium
 •Infectious Diseases, Other
 •Occupational and Environmental Medicine
 •Diagnosis
 •Screening
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
Cost-effectiveness of Tuberculosis Screening in Health Care Workers Is Not Robust

James Mancuso, MD, MPH; David Niebuhr, MD, MPH; Margot R. Krauss, MD, MPH; Clifton Dabbs, DO; Katherine Anderson, PhD

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

We read with interest the article by de Perio et al1 regarding the cost-effectiveness of screening for latent tuberculosis in health care workers. We commend their analysis of an important topic and find most of the analysis and results reasonable. However, readers should be cautioned that several of the assumptions used in their model are inconsistent with more recently published data.2 These differences may invalidate some of their conclusions that new blood tests for tuberculosis are both "more effective and less costly" than tuberculin skin testing (TST).

Of greatest concern is the assumption that the currently marketed QuantiFERON-TB Gold in Tube (QFT-GIT) (Cellestis Limited, Carnegie, Australia) has a higher sensitivity than the TST. The 2008 meta-analysis by Pai and colleagues2 captured a more robust and representative set of estimates than those . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Cost-effectiveness of Interferon Gamma Release Assays vs Tuberculin Skin Tests in Health Care Workers
Marie A. de Perio, Joel Tsevat, Gary A. Roselle, Stephen M. Kralovic, and Mark H. Eckman
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(2):179-187.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

Cost-effectiveness of Tuberculosis Screening in Health Care Workers Is Not Robust—Reply
Marie A. de Perio, Joel Tsevat, Gary A. Roselle, Stephen M. Kralovic, and Mark H. Eckman
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(14):1336-1337.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.