You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 14, July 27, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Tuberculosis/ Other Mycobacterium
 •Infectious Diseases, Other
 •Occupational and Environmental Medicine
 •Diagnosis
 •Screening
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
Cost-effectiveness of Tuberculosis Screening in Health Care Workers Is Not Robust—Reply

Marie A. de Perio, MD; Joel Tsevat, MD, MPH; Gary A. Roselle, MD; Stephen M. Kralovic, MD, MPH; Mark H. Eckman, MD, MS

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In reply

We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the thoughtful comments of Mancuso and colleagues concerning new data on the test characteristics of interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) published after our cost-effectiveness analysis article1 was accepted for publication. Mancuso and colleagues express concern that the latest meta-analysis by Pai and colleagues2 reported a pooled sensitivity of 77% for the TST vs our pooled value of 67%; 78% for the QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G) (Cellestis Limited) vs our value of 83%; and 70% for the QFT-GIT vs our value of 76%.1-2

Our decision model stratified health care workers undergoing IGRA testing into those with vs without indeterminate results.1 Therefore, the proportion of true-positive and true-negative results among those with definitive results is somewhat different from overall sensitivity and . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Cost-effectiveness of Interferon Gamma Release Assays vs Tuberculin Skin Tests in Health Care Workers
Marie A. de Perio, Joel Tsevat, Gary A. Roselle, Stephen M. Kralovic, and Mark H. Eckman
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(2):179-187.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

Cost-effectiveness of Tuberculosis Screening in Health Care Workers Is Not Robust
James Mancuso, David Niebuhr, Margot R. Krauss, Clifton Dabbs, and Katherine Anderson
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(14):1336.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.