 |
 |

HEALTH CARE REFORM
Do Hospitalists Improve Quality?
Robert M. Centor, MD;
Benjamin B. Taylor, MD, MPH
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(15):1351-1352.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In this issue, in an article examining the association between hospitalists and performance on hospital-level quality indicators, López and colleagues1 found that hospitals with hospitalists have higher "quality of care" scores than those without hospitalists and attribute these improvements to the hospitalists' presence. This article provides interesting data, which unfortunately are not persuasive enough to support that conclusion. This editorial addresses several important issues: the definition of quality, the value of performance measures, the difference between quality and safety, alternative analyses, alternative explanations, and finally, what questions should we ask in 2009 about hospitalists and quality.
Hospital medicine continues to thrive, primarily for economic reasons. Several articles have touted the benefits of hospitalists, as referenced in the article by López et al.1 These articles have focused primarily on decreases in length of stay and hospital charges, while suggesting no change in . . . [Full Text of this Article] QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
HOSPITALISTS AND IMPACT ON PERFORMANCE
HOSPITALIST GROUPS AND THEIR STRUCTURE
HOSPITALIST INFLUENCE AND SAFETY ISSUES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Hospitalists and the Quality of Care in Hospitals
Lenny López, Leroi S. Hicks, Amy P. Cohen, Sylvia McKean, and Joel S. Weissman
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(15):1389-1394.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|