You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 15, Aug 10/24, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Nursing Care
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Health Care Reform
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

HEALTH CARE REFORM
Do Hospitalists Improve Quality?

Robert M. Centor, MD; Benjamin B. Taylor, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(15):1351-1352.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In this issue, in an article examining the association between hospitalists and performance on hospital-level quality indicators, López and colleagues1 found that hospitals with hospitalists have higher "quality of care" scores than those without hospitalists and attribute these improvements to the hospitalists' presence. This article provides interesting data, which unfortunately are not persuasive enough to support that conclusion. This editorial addresses several important issues: the definition of quality, the value of performance measures, the difference between quality and safety, alternative analyses, alternative explanations, and finally, what questions should we ask in 2009 about hospitalists and quality.

Hospital medicine continues to thrive, primarily for economic reasons. Several articles have touted the benefits of hospitalists, as referenced in the article by López et al.1 These articles have focused primarily on decreases in length of stay and hospital charges, while suggesting no change in . . . [Full Text of this Article]

QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT


HOSPITALISTS AND IMPACT ON PERFORMANCE

HOSPITALIST GROUPS AND THEIR STRUCTURE

HOSPITALIST INFLUENCE AND SAFETY ISSUES

AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Hospitalists and the Quality of Care in Hospitals
Lenny López, Leroi S. Hicks, Amy P. Cohen, Sylvia McKean, and Joel S. Weissman
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(15):1389-1394.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.