You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 18, October 12, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Neurology
 •Alzheimer Disease
 •Dementias
 •Psychiatry
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Surgery
 •Orthopedic Surgery
 •Arrhythmias
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Cholinesterase Inhibitors Due to Dissimilar Follow-up Periods

Mark Chan, MBBS

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The study by Gill et al1 suggested a higher risk of adverse outcomes including syncope, bradycardia, pacemaker insertions, and hip fractures in community-dwelling adults with dementia receiving cholinesterase inhibitors compared with well-matched controls. These findings have important implications, as the agents in question remain the mainstay of symptomatic treatment for an otherwise debilitating illness.

It is interesting to note that while the incidence of hospital visits for syncope are comparatively higher in the cholinesterase inhibitor cohort (2.2% vs 1.5% in controls, see Table 3 in Gill et al1), the incidences for all other adverse outcomes are actually almost identical between cholinesterase inhibitor and control groups (hospital visits for bradycardia, 0.5% vs 0.4%; pacemaker insertions, 0.3% vs 0.3%; and hospitalizations for hip fractures, 1.6% vs 1.6%). The significant difference noted in the event rates and subsequent hazard ratios are therefore mainly influenced by the shorter follow-up periods . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Syncope and Its Consequences in Patients With Dementia Receiving Cholinesterase Inhibitors: A Population-Based Cohort Study
Sudeep S. Gill, Geoffrey M. Anderson, Hadas D. Fischer, Chaim M. Bell, Ping Li, Sharon-Lise T. Normand, and Paula A. Rochon
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(9):867-873.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Cholinesterase Inhibitors Due to Dissimilar Follow-up Periods—Reply
Sudeep S. Gill, Chaim M. Bell, and Paula A. Rochon
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(18):1724-1725.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.