You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 19, October 26, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Editor's Correspondence
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Internet
 •Patient Education/ Health Literacy
 •Public Health
 •Tobacco
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
Concerns About a Meta-analysis of Computer Smoking Cessation Programs

M. Justin Byron, MHS; Nathan K. Cobb, MD

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

We appreciate the work by Myung et al1 in conducting a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating computer- and Web-based smoking cessation programs. However, there is a fundamental problem with the heterogeneity of the studies included, an underlying issue that reflects the state of the science rather than the authors' technique.

Of the 13 studies described as "computer based," 9 involved mailing tailored print materials, a technique that is already known to be effective from previous meta-analyses,2 and which could for the most part be accomplished with research assistants and a typewriter. The remaining 4 studies, in which the subjects interacted with a computer, showed no statistically significant effect. In the 9 studies described as "Web based," in which all participants presumably directly interacted with a computer program via the Internet, the interventions varied to such an extent that no useful class . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Concerns About a Meta-analysis of Computer Smoking Cessation Programs—Reply
Seung-Kwon Myung, Diana D. McDonnell, Gene Kazinets, Hong Gwan Seo, and Joel M. Moskowitz
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1814-1815.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials: Web-Based Interventions for Smoking Cessation Among Adolescents, College Students, and Adults
Hutton et al.
Nicotine Tob Res 2011;13:227-238.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.