You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 20, November 9, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Invited Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Patient-Physician Relationship, Other
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

HEALTH CARE REFORM
Entering the Second Decade of the Patient Safety Movement: The Field Matures

Comment on "Disclosure of Hospital Adverse Events and Its Association With Patients' Ratings of the Quality of Care"

Robert M. Wachter, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(20):1894-1896.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

December 1, 2009, marks the 10-year anniversary of the Institute of Medicine report on medical mistakes, To Err is Human, the blockbuster that launched the modern patient safety movement.1-2 The occasion of this anniversary gives us an opportunity to reflect on the progress we have made in patient safety and on areas that have not received the attention they deserve.

The Institute of Medicine report that popularized the statistic that 44 000 to 98 000 Americans die each year as a result of medical errors ("a jumbo jet a day") unleashed a variety of pressures to improve patient safety. Perhaps most importantly (particularly in the early years), accreditation and regulation became far more aggressive.3 For example, the Joint Commission (previously the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations), launched a program of unannounced hospital surveys and began promoting and enforcing a variety of "National Patient Safety Goals."4 . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Diagnostic Error in Medicine: Analysis of 583 Physician-Reported Errors
Gordon D. Schiff, Omar Hasan, Seijeoung Kim, Richard Abrams, Karen Cosby, Bruce L. Lambert, Arthur S. Elstein, Scott Hasler, Martin L. Kabongo, Nela Krosnjar, Richard Odwazny, Mary F. Wisniewski, and Robert A. McNutt
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(20):1881-1887.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Disclosure of Hospital Adverse Events and Its Association With Patients' Ratings of the Quality of Care
Lenny López, Joel S. Weissman, Eric C. Schneider, Saul N. Weingart, Amy P. Cohen, and Arnold M. Epstein
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(20):1888-1894.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.