You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 20, November 9, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Invited Commentary
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Informatics, Other
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Patient Education/ Health Literacy
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Cardiac Diagnostic Tests
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Quandaries of Informed Consent

Comment on "Patient Comprehension of an Interactive, Computer-Based Information Program for Cardiac Catheterization"

Janice Lynn Hanson, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(20):1914-1915.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Although widely accepted as ethically essential, obtaining meaningful informed consent with good consistency has proven difficult. The report by Tait and colleagues in this issue of the Archives illustrates some of the challenges and provides glimpses of a promising approach to the task of conveying understandable information to patients about cardiac catheterization. The authors describe a carefully constructed study of a computer-based interactive educational program for patients presented shortly before a physician asks for informed consent for cardiac catheterization. Referencing an early edition of a classic book on biomedical ethics by Beauchamp and Childress,1 Tait et al note 3 key elements of informed consent: threshold, information, and consent. They conduct their study to address the information element, specifically whether a particular computer program can convey information to patients more effectively than the standard informed consent procedure at their hospital.

This study used a careful educational research . . . [Full Text of this Article]

RECONSIDERING INFORMED CONSENT


CONCLUSION

AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Patient Comprehension of an Interactive, Computer-Based Information Program for Cardiac Catheterization: A Comparison With Standard Information
Alan R. Tait, Terri Voepel-Lewis, Mauro Moscucci, Colleen M. Brennan-Martinez, and Robert Levine
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(20):1907-1914.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.