You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 21, November 23, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Stroke
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Arrhythmias
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
The International Normalized Ratio Range of 2.0 to 3.0 Remains Appropriate for Atrial Fibrillation

Daniel E. Singer, MD; Margaret C. Fang, MD, MPH; Alan S. Go, MD

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Torn et al1 conclude that the target international normalized ratio (INR) for atrial fibrillation (AF) should be 3.0 to 3.4, rather than the standard INR range of 2.0 to 3.0,2 based on a Leiden Thrombosis Centre cohort observed from 1994 to 1998. We believe that their data do not support their conclusion.

Precisely comparing the efficacy of adjacent INR intervals demands large numbers of relevant outcome events. Even if one accepts all the events reported by Torn et al1 as relevant, the total number is too small. The confidence intervals of crude incidence rates across INR intervals from 2.0 through 3.5 highly overlap. We found no assertion that an INR range of 3.0 to 3.4 was statistically significantly different from lower INR intervals. Furthermore, as the authors acknowledge, patients with AF are anticoagulated to prevent ischemic strokes. . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Optimal Level of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy for the Prevention of Arterial Thrombosis in Patients With Mechanical Heart Valve Prostheses, Atrial Fibrillation, or Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Study of 4202 Patients
Marieke Torn, Suzanne C. Cannegieter, Ward L. E. M. Bollen, Felix J. M. van der Meer, Ernst E. van der Wall, and Frits R. Rosendaal
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(13):1203-1209.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.