You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 6, March 23, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Metabolic Diseases
 •Obesity
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
Issues in Body Fatness Measurement

Gerson T. Lesser, MD

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Wildman and coworkers1 present interesting relationships of body mass index (BMI) (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared) with the prevalence of defined "cardiometabolic abnormalities" in a representative sample of the US population. Their apparent surprise that the presence or absence of metabolic abnormality is often not associated with BMI-defined weight categories should be diminished if we appreciate what the anthropomorphic measurements represent as to fat content and lean body mass (LBM).

The authors note correctly that BMI does not distinguish between fat content and LBM in a 2-compartment body model. Yet their use of BMI to define "normal weight," "overweight," and "obese" carries the implicit assumption that interindividual LBM is constant for any given height so that increased BMI represents increased body fat content. This assumption is not valid; even within a normal, homogeneous cohort of subjects with similar height, . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.