 |
 |

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
Progression of the Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Normal-Weight US Subjects
André J. Scheen, MD, PhD
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Wildman et al1 reported a high prevalence (23.5%) of clustering of cardiometabolic abnormalities in normal-weight adults among US subjects. The report of an 8.6% prevalence of metabolic syndrome according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP-III) definition in normal-weight individuals in their cohort allows for comparison with previous data in adults with a BMI lower than 25. In US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III, the overall prevalence of metabolic syndrome in such individuals averaged 4.6% in men and 6.2% in women,2 with waist circumference having a major impact (9.7% in men and 12.8% in women with increased waist vs 5.7% and 2.9%, respectively, in those with a normal waist size).3 It is interesting to compare the US data collected in 2 successive NHANES populations. Indeed, according to the same ATP-III criteria, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in . . . [Full Text of this Article] AUTHOR INFORMATION
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
The Obese Without Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Clustering and the Normal Weight With Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Clustering: Prevalence and Correlates of 2 Phenotypes Among the US Population (NHANES 1999-2004)
Rachel P. Wildman, Paul Muntner, Kristi Reynolds, Aileen P. McGinn, Swapnil Rajpathak, Judith Wylie-Rosett, and MaryFran R. Sowers
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(15):1617-1624.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTERS
Issues in Body Fatness Measurement
Gerson T. Lesser
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(6):636.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Progression of the Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Normal-Weight US Subjects—Reply
Rachel P. Wildman, Paul Muntner, and MaryFran R. Sowers
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(6):637.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|