You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 170 No. 1, January 11, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Editorial
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pacemakers/ Defibrillators
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Emergency Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Weak Link in the Rapid Response System

Dana P. Edelson, MD, MS

Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(1):12-13.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is often the end result of progressive clinical deterioration caused by reversible underlying causes such as sepsis and respiratory failure, which have better survival the earlier they are treated.1 It therefore follows that a rapid response system (RRS) designed to identify early signs of clinical deterioration and activate a specialized team of clinicians should decrease hospital mortality. This idea is so intuitive that it might be reasonable to disregard some evidence to the contrary,2 as the Joint Commission3 did with its 2008 National Patient Safety Goals, mandating such a system in US hospitals.

In this issue of the Archives, Chan and colleagues4 deal another blow to this widespread patient safety practice. The authors present a meta-analysis of 18 RRS trials and demonstrate a significant reduction in cardiac arrest rates outside the intensive care unit without a significant improvement in overall . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Rapid Response Teams: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Paul S. Chan, Renuka Jain, Brahmajee K. Nallmothu, Robert A. Berg, and Comilla Sasson
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(1):18-26.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Validation of a new non-invasive automatic monitor of respiratory rate for postoperative subjects
Drummond et al.
Br J Anaesth 2011;107:462-469.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2010 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.