You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 170 No. 1, January 11, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Invited Commentary
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Conflict of Interest
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Cardiovascular Interventions, Other
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Review
 •Screening
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Screening for High-Risk Cardiovascular Disease: A Challenge for the Guidelines

Comment on "Systematic Review of Guidelines on Cardiovascular Risk Assessment: Which Recommendations Should Clinicians Follow for a Cardiovascular Health Check?"

Sidney C. Smith Jr, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(1):40-42.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, resulting in more than 17 million deaths in 2008. Early detection and treatment of high-risk patients has been endorsed as an important strategy to prevent cardiovascular events. The Institute of Medicine has emphasized the importance of evidence-based medicine expressed through guideline recommendations as a means to improve patient outcomes. Health care providers involved in preventive medicine are called on to initiate therapies to prevent cardiovascular disease through the use of guidelines issued by multiple groups. Yet concerns remain about the process by which guidelines might be developed, and a lack of congruence among their recommendations is one reason for low implementation by health care providers.

In this issue of the Archives, Ferket and colleagues report the results of their systematic review of guidelines containing recommendations for the assessment of cardiovascular risk in apparently healthy adults. . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Systematic Review of Guidelines on Cardiovascular Risk Assessment: Which Recommendations Should Clinicians Follow for a Cardiovascular Health Check?
Bart S. Ferket, Ersen B. Colkesen, Jacob J. Visser, Sandra Spronk, Roderik A. Kraaijenhagen, Ewout W. Steyerberg, and M. G. Myriam Hunink
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(1):27-40.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factor in the Chinese population: the 2007-2008 China National Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Study
Yang et al.
Eur Heart J 2012;33:213-220.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2010 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.