 |
 |

Prasugrel and CancerAn Uncertain Association or a Credible Risk That Meaningfully Alters the Benefit-Risk Balance
Sanjay Kaul, MD;
George A. Diamond, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(12):1010-1012.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
On July 10, 2009, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved prasugrel for use in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).1 In the pivotal clinical trial on which this decision was based (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38 [TRITON–TIMI 38]), prasugrel reduced the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or nonfatal stroke by 19% compared with clopidogrel.2 The benefit was driven primarily by nonfatal MI, including clinically silent biomarker elevations.3-4 The majority of the benefit occurred in the first 30 days of follow-up.3-4 Despite the exclusion of patients at high risk of bleeding, prasugrel was nevertheless associated with an overall 31% increase in bleeding, a 52% increase in life-threatening bleeding, and a 318% increase in fatal bleeding. Bleeding, unlike treatment benefit, appeared . . . [Full Text of this Article]PRASUGREL CAUSES CANCER
PRASUGREL PROMOTES CANCER
PRASUGREL TRIGGERS DETECTION OF CANCER
PRASUGREL IS UNRELATED TO CANCER
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Author Affiliations: Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and the David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
CiteULike Connotea Delicious Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Prasugrel as a Potential Cancer Promoter: Review of the Unpublished Data
James S. Floyd and Victor L. Serebruany
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(12):1078-1080.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|