You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 170 No. 12, June 28, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Editorial
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Oncology, Other
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prasugrel and Cancer

An Uncertain Association or a Credible Risk That Meaningfully Alters the Benefit-Risk Balance

Sanjay Kaul, MD; George A. Diamond, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(12):1010-1012.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

On July 10, 2009, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved prasugrel for use in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).1 In the pivotal clinical trial on which this decision was based (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38 [TRITON–TIMI 38]), prasugrel reduced the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or nonfatal stroke by 19% compared with clopidogrel.2 The benefit was driven primarily by nonfatal MI, including clinically silent biomarker elevations.3-4 The majority of the benefit occurred in the first 30 days of follow-up.3-4 Despite the exclusion of patients at high risk of bleeding, prasugrel was nevertheless associated with an overall 31% increase in bleeding, a 52% increase in life-threatening bleeding, and a 318% increase in fatal bleeding. Bleeding, unlike treatment benefit, appeared . . . [Full Text of this Article]

PRASUGREL CAUSES CANCER


PRASUGREL PROMOTES CANCER

PRASUGREL TRIGGERS DETECTION OF CANCER

PRASUGREL IS UNRELATED TO CANCER

AUTHOR INFORMATION
Author Affiliations: Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and the David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Prasugrel as a Potential Cancer Promoter: Review of the Unpublished Data
James S. Floyd and Victor L. Serebruany
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(12):1078-1080.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2010 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.