You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 158 No. 12, June 22, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (78)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Echocardiography
 •Arrhythmias
 •Cardiac Diagnostic Tests
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Echocardiographic Predictors of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

A Prospective Study of 1066 Patients From 3 Clinical Trials

Atrial Fibrillation Investigators: Atrial Fibrillation, Aspirin, Anticoagulation Study; European Atrial Fibrillation Study; Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study; Boston Area Anticoagulation Trial for Atrial Fibrillation Study; Canadian Atrial Fibrillation Study; Veterans Affairs Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study

Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1316-1320.

ABSTRACT

Background  Clinical features that consistently predict ischemic stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation have been identified, while echocardiographic risk factors are less well defined.

Objective  To determine whether the results of transthoracic echocardiography add independent information to the clinical risk factors for stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Methods  Transthoracic echocardiographic findings and clinical features from 1066 patients with atrial fibrillation assigned to placebo or control in 3 randomized trials (Boston Area Anticoagulation Trial for Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation I Study, and Veterans Affairs Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study) were correlated with subsequent ischemic stroke by multivariate analysis.

Results  The mean±SD age of patients was 67±10 years, 78% were men, 55% had a history of hypertension, 19% had a history of diabetes, 7% had a previous transient ischemic attack or stroke, and 27% had a history of heart failure. During a mean follow-up of 1.6 years, 78 ischemic strokes occurred (annual rate, 4.7%). Moderate to severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction shown via 2-dimensional echocardiography was a strong independent predictor of stroke (relative risk, 2.5; P<.001) in the 1010 patients in whom echocardiographic values for left ventricular function were available. Left atrial diameter by M-mode echocardiography did not predict stroke (relative risk, 1.02/mm; P=.10). Of 163 patients categorized as low risk based on clinical features (annual stroke rate, 0.8%; 95% confidence interval, 0.2%-3.0%), 10 had moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction shown via 2-dimensional echocardiography and a 9.3% per year risk of stroke (95% confidence interval, 1.3%-66%). Conversely, 728 of the 847 patients at high risk for stroke based on clinical criteria had normal or mildly abnormal left ventricular function; their stroke rate was 4.4% (95% confidence interval, 3.4%-5.8%).

Conclusions  Left ventricular systolic dysfunction shown via 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography independently predicts risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Echocardiography may prove most useful in a small group of patients who have a low risk of stroke according to clinical factors.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

WE PREVIOUSLY reported clinical predictors of ischemic stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) based on the pooled results of 5 randomized clinical trials.1 These predictors were increasing age, previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), history of hypertension, or diabetes. Three of these trials2-4 collected transthoracic echocardiographic data at study entry. In this analysis, we pooled individual patient data from these 3 trials to identify the echocardiographic predictors of stroke and to assess whether echocardiography enhanced risk stratification compared with using clinical predictors alone.


METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Echocardiographic data from individual patients obtained at entry into 3 clinical trials were assembled in a common database, as previously reported.1 Patients were included if they were assigned to placebo or control in the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (SPAF) I study,2 the Veterans Affairs Stroke Prevention in Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation (SPINAF)3 study, or the Boston Area Anticoagulation Trial for Atrial Fibrillation (BAATAF).4 In the BAATAF study, 46% of patients in the control group took various doses of aspirin.4 The primary outcome for this analysis was ischemic stroke, defined as the abrupt onset of a focal neurologic deficit that lasted more than 24 hours. Hemorrhages were excluded by neuroimaging in most cases. No attempt was made to distinguish cardioembolic stroke from noncardioembolic stroke.

For determination of left atrial diameter, all studies used either the 2-dimensional (2-D) parasternal long axis or short axis view to guide acquisition of the M-mode left atrial tracing. The BAATAF study measured the inside edges rather than the leading- to inside-edge method used by the other 2 studies. To reconcile the 2 methods, a random set of 19 echocardiograms from the BAATAF study were independently interpreted using the leading- to inside-edge method by 1 echocardiographer from each study. For each individual echocardiographer the reinterpreted values were statistically significantly higher than the original BAATAF values (for each, P=.004, P=.004, and P<.001, respectively). The mean absolute difference was 5.5 mm. Unless otherwise indicated, all analyses of left atrial diameter in this study included an adjustment for this systematic difference. The BAATAF results were also systematically different from the other 2 studies for the variables intraventricular septal thickness, left ventricular posterior wall thickness, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and left ventricular mass. It was assumed that this was also due to a difference in measurement technique, and analyses of these variables were thus adjusted for study as well.

Analysis of M-mode echocardiograms was otherwise based on standard criteria.5 Left ventricular muscle mass was calculated as follows6:



where IVS indicates interventricular septal thickness at end diastole (centimeters); LVPW, left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end diastole (centimeters); and LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (centimeters). Left ventricular systolic function was categorized qualitatively by 2-D echocardiography in all 3 studies, when studies were technically adequate. The SPAF study assessed "overall" and "focal" left ventricular wall motion as normal, mildly abnormal, and moderately to severely abnormal. The SPINAF study assessed "global" wall motion as normal, mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, or severely abnormal, and "regional" wall motion, in 3 anatomical regions, as normal, hypokinetic, akinetic, or dyskinetic. The BAATAF study assessed 6 separate regions of the left ventricle as normal, hypokinetic, akinetic, or dyskinetic. For the current analysis left ventricular systolic function was defined as mildly abnormal as follows: for the SPAF study, mild global or focal abnormality present; for the SPINAF study, mild global abnormality present and/or any regional wall motion categorized as hypokinetic; and for the BAATAF study, 1 or 2 regions assessed as hypokinetic or 1 region assessed as akinetic. Moderate to severe abnormality was considered present when there was a global or regional abnormality of left ventricular function worse than mild, as defined above.

Event rates were estimated based on patient-years of exposure to first ischemic stroke, death, or end of study, and analyzed by an intention-to-treat paradigm. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess both the univariate and multivariate association of clinical and echocardiographic parameters with the risk of stroke. In all analyses, the estimate for the hazard ratio is given as an estimate of the relative risk (RR). To account for systematic differences in measurement of the left atrium and left ventricular mass among the 3 studies, models were constructed using percentile rankings for left atrial size grouped by sex and study. A 2-tailed P<=.05 was considered statistically significant.


RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Among 1066 patients with AF in the pooled analysis, 78% were men, the mean age was 67 years, 55% had a history of hypertension, 19% had a history of diabetes mellitus, 7% had a previous TIA or stroke, and 27% had a history of congestive heart failure (Table 1). Moderate to severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction was present in 129 patients (13%), including 50 patients with no history of clinical heart failure.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Clinical and Echocardiographic Characteristics at Study Entry*


Among these 1066 patients, 78 ischemic strokes occurred during an average of 1.6 patient-years of follow-up (annual rate, 4.7%). The only echocardiographic feature that had a strong statistically significant univariate association with stroke was moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction (P<.001; Table 2 and Figure 1); a finding that was consistent in all 3 studies. Interventricular septal thickness also reached conventional statistical significance (P=.02). The association between increasing left atrial diameter and the risk of stroke was not statistically significant (RR, 1.02/mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.06; P=.10) if left atrial size was analyzed as a continuous variable, or if the upper 25th percentiles (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.90-2.48; P=.12) or 10th percentiles (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.29-1.79; P=.48) were analyzed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 2. Echocardiographic Features and Subsequent Stroke: Unadjusted Relative Risk*




View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Atrial fibrillation echo analysis. CI indicates confidence interval; LV, left ventricle.


Independent clinical predictors of ischemic stroke in these patients were age (RR, 1.5 per decade; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9; P=.008), previous stroke or TIA (RR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.8-6.6; P<.001), history of diabetes (RR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.8; P=.05), and history of heart failure (RR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7; P=.03) (Table 3). History of hypertension, which was previously shown to predict stroke,1 was not significantly associated with stroke in the current analysis (RR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.9-2.5; P=.11). After adjustment for these 5 clinical parameters, moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction remained associated with an important increase in the risk of stroke (RR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.4; P<.001) (Table 3). When adjusted for clinical predictors, left atrial diameter had no predictive value for stroke (P=.62).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 3. Multivariate Analysis of Clinical and Echocardiographic Features Compared With Subsequent Stroke


A clinical risk stratification scheme previously developed by our group found that patients younger than 65 years who had no prior TIA or stroke and no history of hypertension or diabetes had an annual rate of stroke of 1%.1 Echocardiography performed in 163 such patients, 2 of whom had a stroke (annual stroke rate, 0.8%; 95% CI, 0.2%-3.0%) (Table 4), found 10 with moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction. Their stroke rate was 9.3% per year (95% CI, 1.3%-66%) compared with 0.4% per year (95% CI, 0.06%-2.9%) in the 153 patients who were considered low risk according to clinical features and who had normal or mildly abnormal left ventricular function on echocardiography (Table 4). Conversely, 728 of the 847 patients at high risk of stroke according to clinical criteria had normal or mildly abnormal left ventricular function. Their annual risk of stroke was 4.4% (95% CI, 3.4%-5.8%). When clinical heart failure was added to this risk stratification scheme, none of the 143 patients younger than 65 years with no clinical risk factors had a stroke, including the 4 patients with moderate to severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction shown on echocardiography.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 4. Stroke Rates by Age and Left Ventricular (LV) Function*



COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction shown via 2-D transthoracic echocardiography was a powerful, consistent, and independent predictor of stroke in patients with AF. By contrast, neither left atrial diameter nor mitral regurgitation were significantly associated with risk of stroke in this analysis. Since our results were derived from echocardiograms obtained and interpreted by many cardiologists at participating sites, these results are likely generalizable to clinical practice. In a previous analysis7 of the SPAF I placebo-assigned patients included in this analysis, left atrial diameter was significantly associated with the combined end point of ischemic stroke and systemic emboli. However, it was not predictive of stroke in a second, larger cohort of patients with AF given aspirin in the SPAF study.8 In both of these analyses, left ventricular dysfunction emerged as a powerful independent risk factor.7-8 With our method of combining and analyzing data, left atrial diameter did not add useful independent information about the risk of stroke in patients with AF.

The clinical factors that were independently associated with stroke in this analysis of patients in 3 trials with full echocardiographic evaluations (increasing age, previous TIA or stroke, history of diabetes, or history of heart failure) were slightly different from those identified in our previous analysis from all 5 primary prevention trials (increasing age, previous TIA or stroke, history of diabetes, or history of hypertension).1 In both analyses, history of hypertension and history of heart failure were associated with risk of stroke by univariate analysis. Thus, the difference in clinical predictors in the 2 analyses may be more apparent than real. This highlights both the problem of relying excessively on an arbitrary P value as evidence of an association, and the relatively small sample size in this analysis. For consistency, the originally published clinical risk stratification scheme derived from all 5 trials1 was used to assess the additional information provided by echocardiography (Table 4).

The data in Table 4 must be interpreted with caution. The small number of patients in many of the risk categories may lead to unstable estimates of the risk of stroke. For example, it is unlikely that patients older than 75 years who have no clinical risk factors and normal left ventricular systolic function truly have a lower rate of stroke than younger patients with similar risk profiles. Nevertheless, normal left ventricular function generally decreased the risk of stroke, and moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction increased this risk. Clinicians may decide to administer anticoagulants to some patients with poor left ventricular systolic function whom they would otherwise have considered to be at low risk of stroke. Similarly, knowledge of left ventricular function is useful when weighing the risks and benefits of anticoagulation in patients who have a high risk of bleeding.

In summary, although the results of transthoracic echocardiography are unlikely to change the decision to administer anticoagulants for most patients, knowledge of left ventricular systolic function may be useful in a small number of patients.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Accepted for publication November 20, 1997.

We thank all the investigators and the Statistics and Epidemiology Research Corp, Seattle, Wash; John Marler, MD, and Michael Walker, MD, of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; and Ina Sungaila of DuPont-Merck Pharmaceuticals, Mississauga, Ontario.

Atrial Fibrillation Investigators

Writing Committee: Michael Ezekowitz, MD; Andreas Laupacis, MD; Gudrun Boysen, MD; Stuart Connolly, MD; Robert Hart, MD; Kenneth James, PhD; Philip Kistler, MD; Peter Koudstaal, MD; Richard Kronmal, PhD; Ruth McBride; Palle Petersen, MD; Daniel Singer, MD.

Echocardiographic Committee: Richard Asinger, MD (SPAF); Joseph Blackshear, MD (SPAF); Michael Ezekowitz, MD, PhD (SPINAF); Jonathan Plehn, MD (BAATAF).

Study Groups

Atrial Fibrillation, Aspirin, Anticoagulation Study: Palle Petersen, MD; Gudrun Boysen, MD; John Godtfredsen, MD; Ellen Andersen, MD; Bjorn Andersen, MD.

Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study (SPAF Investigators)

Boston Area Anticoagulation Trial for Atrial Fibrillation Study (BAATAF): Daniel Singer, MD; Robert Hughes, MD; Daryl Gress, MD; Mary Sheehan, RN; Lynn Oertel, RN-C; Sue Maraventano, RN; Dyan Blewett, MS; Bernard Rosner, PhD; Philip Kistler, MD.

Canadian Atrial Fibrillation Anticoagulation Study: Stuart Connolly, MD; Andreas Laupacis, MD; Michael Gent, DSc; R. Roberts, MSc; J. Cairns, MD; C. Joyner, MD; and the CAFA Investigators.

Stroke Prevention in Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation Study: Michael Ezekowitz, MD; Samuel Bridgers, MD; Kenneth James, PhD; Cindy Colling, RPH; Heidi Krause-Steinrauf, MS; and the SPINAF Investigators.

The European Atrial Fibrillation Study (EAFT): Anet van Latum; Peter Koudstaal; and the EAFT Investigators.

Reprints: Michael D. Ezekowitz, MD, PhD, Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University, 333 Cedar St, 3 FMP, PO Box 3333, New Haven, CT 06510-8056.

This study was supported by grant R0124224 from the Division of Stroke and Trauma, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Md, and by a grant from DuPont-Merck Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, Del.


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

1. AFI Investigators. Risk factors for stroke and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1449-1457. ABSTRACT
2. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study: final results. Circulation. 1991;84:527-539. FREE FULL TEXT
3. Ezekowitz MD, Bridgers SL, James KE, et al. Warfarin in the prevention of stroke associated with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1406-1412. ABSTRACT
4. The Boston Area Anticoagulation Trial for Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. The effect of low-dose warfarin on the risk of stroke in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:1505. ABSTRACT
5. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation of M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation. 1978;58:1072-1083. FREE FULL TEXT
6. Devereux RB, Reicher N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man: anatomic validation of the method. Circulation. 1977;55:613-618. FREE FULL TEXT
7. SPAF Investigators. Predictors of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation, II: echocardiographic features of patients at risk—the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:6-12.
8. SPAF Investigators. Risk factors for thromboembolism during aspirin therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1995;5:147-157.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Atrial fibrillation detected by mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry in cryptogenic TIA or stroke
Tayal et al.
Neurology 2008;71:1696-1701.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Managing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: the role of echocardiography
Gabriel and Klein
Europace 2008;10:iii8-iii13.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence and clinical impact of left atrial thrombus and dense spontaneous echo contrast in patients with atrial fibrillation and low CHADS2 score
Kleemann et al.
Eur J Echocardiogr 2008;0:jen256v1-6.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Singer et al.
Chest 2008;133:546S-592S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Valvular and Structural Heart Disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Salem et al.
Chest 2008;133:593S-629S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of 12 Risk Stratification Schemes to Predict Stroke in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation Working Group
Stroke 2008;39:1901-1910.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Independent predictors of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review
The Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation Working Gro
Neurology 2007;69:546-554.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Identification, diagnosis and assessment of atrial fibrillation
Dewar et al.
Heart 2007;93:25-28.
FULL TEXT  

ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: full text: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society
Writing Committee Members et al.
Europace 2006;8:651-745.
FULL TEXT  

Additive Role of Plasma von Willebrand Factor Levels to Clinical Factors for Risk Stratification of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Lip et al.
Stroke 2006;37:2294-2300.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society
Fuster et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:e149-e246.
FULL TEXT  

ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society
Fuster et al.
Circulation 2006;114:e257-e354.
FULL TEXT  

Emerging Role of Direct Thrombin Inhibitors in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Potential and Peril
Kim and Arora
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THER 2005;10:11-21.
ABSTRACT  

Selecting Patients With Atrial Fibrillation for Anticoagulation: Stroke Risk Stratification in Patients Taking Aspirin
Gage et al.
Circulation 2004;110:2287-2292.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prothrombotic Activity Is Increased in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Risk Factors for Embolism
Inoue et al.
Chest 2004;126:687-692.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy
Singer et al.
Chest 2004;126:429S-456S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antithrombotic Therapy in Valvular Heart Disease--Native and Prosthetic: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy
Salem et al.
Chest 2004;126:457S-482S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management of Atrial Fibrillation: Review of the Evidence for the Role of Pharmacologic Therapy, Electrical Cardioversion, and Echocardiography
McNamara et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;139:1018-1033.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The high incidence of left atrial appendage thrombosis in patients on maintenance haemodialysis
Nishimura et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003;18:2339-2347.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A 60-Year-Old Woman With Atrial Fibrillation
Singer
JAMA 2003;290:2182-2189.
FULL TEXT  

A Risk Score for Predicting Stroke or Death in Individuals With New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in the Community: The Framingham Heart Study
Wang et al.
JAMA 2003;290:1049-1056.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lessons from the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Trials
Hart et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:831-838.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Atrial fibrillation and heart failure: natural history and pharmacological treatment
Savelieva and John Camm
Europace 2003;5:S5-S19.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Thrombotic Disorders: Diagnosis and Treatment
Schafer et al.
ASH Education Book 2003;2003:520-539.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Oral Anticoagulants vs Aspirin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: An Individual Patient Meta-analysis
van Walraven et al.
JAMA 2002;288:2441-2448.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Transoesophageal echocardiography in selecting patients for anticoagulation after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack
Strandberg et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2002;73:29-33.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Lip and Hee
QJM 2001;94:665-678.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation) developed in collaboration with the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology
Eur Heart J 2001;22:1852-1923.
 

Anticoagulation and atrial fibrillation
CONWAY and LIP
Postgrad. Med. J. 2001;77:487-487.
FULL TEXT  

Validation of Clinical Classification Schemes for Predicting Stroke: Results From the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation
Gage et al.
JAMA 2001;285:2864-2870.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation
Albers et al.
Chest 2001;119:194S-206S.
FULL TEXT  

Antithrombotic Therapy in Valvular Heart Disease
Salem et al.
Chest 2001;119:207S-219S.
FULL TEXT  

Safety of Discontinuation of Anticoagulation in Patients With Intracranial Hemorrhage at High Thromboembolic Risk
Phan et al.
Arch Neurol 2000;57:1710-1713.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A European View on the North American Fifth Consensus on Antithrombotic Therapy
Verstraete et al.
Chest 2000;117:1755-1770.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Warfarin for Stroke Prevention Still Underused in Atrial Fibrillation : Patterns of Omission
Cohen et al.
Stroke 2000;31:1217-1222.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The impact of patients' preferences on the treatment of atrial fibrillation: observational study of patient based decision analysis Commentary: patients, preferences, and evidence
Protheroe et al.
BMJ 2000;320:1380-1384.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Review: antithrombotic agents prevent stroke in non-valvular atrial fibrillation
Pullicino
Evid. Based Med. 2000;5:82-82.
FULL TEXT  

Assessment of risk of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation: which patients should be anticoagulated?
Lip
Eur Heart J 1999;20:1757-1758.
 

Factors Associated With Ischemic Stroke During Aspirin Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation : Analysis of 2012 Participants in the SPAF I–III Clinical Trials
Hart et al.
Stroke 1999;30:1223-1229.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preventing Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Ezekowitz and Levine
JAMA 1999;281:1830-1835.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Aortic Plaque in Atrial Fibrillation : Prevalence, Predictors, and Thromboembolic Implications
Blackshear et al.
Stroke 1999;30:834-840.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

LV Systolic Dysfunction Predicts Stroke in AF Patients
JWatch General 1998;1998:7-7.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.