You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 22, December 13, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (44)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Thrombolysis
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Time Course of Reversal of Anticoagulant Effect of Warfarin by Intravenous and Subcutaneous Phytonadione

Guna Raj, MD; Raminder Kumar, MD; W. Paul McKinney, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2721-2724.

ABSTRACT

Background  Excessive anticoagulation increases the risk of hemorrhagic complications associated with oral anticoagulant therapy. Oral or parenteral phytonadione is used to reverse excessive anticoagulation. Intravenous (IV) phytonadione, while effective, is associated with a small risk of serious anaphylactic reactions. Subcutaneous (SC) administration is safer, but there is little information on its relative efficacy in small doses.

Methods  Twenty-two patients with asymptomatic prolongation of prothrombin time were prospectively randomized and treated with 1 mg of phytonadione IV or 1 mg SC. Prothrombin time was measured at baseline and at 8 and 24 hours after phytonadione administration and expressed as international normalized ratio (INR).

Results  Mean INR at baseline was 8.0 and 8.5 in the IV and SC groups, respectively (P = .70). At 8 hours, mean INR was 4.6 in the IV group and 8.0 in the SC group (P = .006), and at 24 hours, mean INR was 3.1 in the IV group and 5.0 in the SC group (P = .009). Mean decrease in INR 8 hours after administration of phytonadione was 3.4 in the IV group and 0.4 in the SC group (P = .02), and mean decrease in INR after 24 hours was 4.9 in the IV group and 3.4 in the SC group (P = .18).

Conclusions  For patients who are excessively anticoagulated with warfarin, small doses of SC phytonadione may not correct the INR as rapidly or as effectively as when administered IV. Higher doses must be considered for more rapid and complete reversal of anticoagulation by the SC route.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Patients and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

PATIENTS TAKING long-term oral anticoagulant therapy with warfarin sodium require close monitoring to maintain their coagulation values within therapeutic range. However, fluctuations in the intensity of anticoagulation can be seen from time to time. In the European Atrial Fibrillation Trial, in which 214 patients had 4883 international normalized ratio (INR) measurements during an average of 2.1 years of follow-up, 56% of INR measurements were within the target range of 2.5 to 3.9; 35% were below and 9% above this range.1 In another study, in patients with mechanical heart valves, the INR was within target range of 3.6 to 4.8 for 61% of the total patient-time, below 3.6 for 31% of the time, and above 4.8 for 8% of the time.2

Excessive anticoagulation with marked prolongation of prothrombin time (PT) and INR above the target range increases the risk of hemorrhagic complications. Cannegieter et al reported a steep rise in the rate of adverse events, from 2 per 100 patient-years with an INR of 2.5 to 4.9 to 4.8 per 100 patient-years with an INR of 5.0 to 5.5 and 75 per 100 patient-years when the INR was 6.5 or above.2 In another study of 6814 patients, 162 major bleeding complications occurred during a 12-month period (2.7 per 100 patient-years). Every 1-point increment in INR above 4.0 resulted in a 42% increase in risk of bleeding.3

While infusion of fresh frozen plasma rapidly corrects the coagulopathy associated with excessive anticoagulation by repleting vitamin K–dependent coagulation factors, this therapy is reserved for patients who manifest bleeding, because of the cost and potential risk of infectious complications. In asymptomatic patients with markedly high INR values, excessive anticoagulation must be corrected to decrease the risk of bleeding. This can be done in 1 of 2 ways: (1) omitting a few doses of warfarin and/or decreasing the daily maintenance dose; or (2) administering phytonadione by oral or parenteral routes. There are few data on the conservative treatment of these patients by withholding and then reducing the dose of warfarin. In one retrospective study in which 48 patients with a mean INR of 11.1 (range, 6.1-80.9) were treated conservatively, the mean INR had decreased to 7.4 (range, 0.9-43.5) after a mean follow-up of 6 days (range, 1-31 days).4 Except for 1 patient who developed gross hematuria within 24 hours of the high initial INR, all other patients did well. Intravenous (IV) phytonadione, even when administered by slow infusion, can be associated with serious reactions, including anaphylaxis and death.5-9 Such reactions have not been reported with subcutaneous (SC) administration of phytonadione. The Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic Therapy guidelines of 1995 for correction of excessive prolongation of INR recommend giving 1 to 2 mg of phytonadione SC if the INR is between 6.0 and 10.0, and 3 mg SC if the INR is above 10.0, even while acknowledging that delivery of phytonadione is more predictable with the IV route and also that the choice between IV and SC administration is a matter of personal preference.10 Higher doses of phytonadione, although effective, may result in transient resistance to subsequent anticoagulation and should thus be reserved for patients with active bleeding. If low-dose SC phytonadione is found to be as effective in correcting excessive anticoagulation as IV phytonadione, then the safer SC route should be used preferentially to correct the asymptomatic prolongation of PT caused by warfarin. However, there are no randomized studies comparing SC phytonadione administration with IV administration.

This randomized, single-blind study compared SC with IV administration of phytonadione for correction of asymptomatic prolongation of the INR among patients taking warfarin.


PATIENTS AND METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Patients and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Patients receiving stable doses of warfarin who came to the anticoagulation clinic of the Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, Tex, with supratherapeutic PT, specifically with an INR greater than 6.0, were invited to participate in the study, which was approved by the Human Studies Committee at our institution. Eligible patients had to have been receiving oral anticoagulant therapy for at least 3 months and receiving a stable dose of warfarin for at least 6 weeks. Patients with any evidence of active bleeding (including minor bleeding, such as excessive bruising, epistaxis, hematuria, etc) or a history of allergy to vitamin K were excluded. After providing written informed consent, subjects were assigned to receive 1 mg of phytonadione (Aquamephyton, Merck & Co Inc, West Point, Pa) either SC or IV, by means of a random numbers table. Phytonadione (1 mg/0.5 mL) was administered SC without dilution or by slow IV injection over 60 seconds after dilution with 5 mL of isotonic sodium chloride solution (for a total volume of 5.5 mL). Patients were observed for 30 minutes for any adverse drug reaction. The PT was measured at 8 hours and again at 24 hours after administration of phytonadione and expressed as INR. All PT measurements were made on citrate samples by means of a thromboplastin reagent with an international sensitivity index of 2.0. Warfarin was withheld for at least 24 hours after administration of phytonadione, and longer if the INR at 24 hours was still greater than 6.0. The investigators were blinded to the treatment assignment; administration of phytonadione and follow-up visits were done by the study nurse. The INR values at baseline and 8 and 24 hours after phytonadione administration were compared between the 2 groups by repeated-measures analysis of variance using the Student-Newman-Keuls adjustment. Five tests were conducted at the .01 level of significance to achieve a .05 overall level of significance. The Fisher exact test was used to examine the association between the route of administration and achieving an INR of 5 or less at 8 and 24 hours. Odds ratios were calculated for these times as well.


RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Patients and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Twenty-two patients, 11 in each group, were enrolled in the study between May 1995 and December 1996. Indications for anticoagulation were as follows: atrial fibrillation (9 patients), prosthetic heart valve (6 patients), embolic cerebrovascular event (3 patients), recurrent deep venous thrombosis (2 patients), and coronary stent and dilated cardiomyopathy (1 patient each).

The mean INR at baseline was 8.0 (range, 6.6-15.1) in the IV phytonadione group and 8.5 (range, 6.0-14.3) in the SC group (P = .7). The mean INR at 8 hours was 4.6 (range, 2.5-12.1) in the IV group and 8.0 (range, 4.2-12.5) in the SC group (P = .01). The mean INR at 24 hours was 3.1 (range, 1.5-6.1) in the IV group and 5.0 (range, 2.8-8.9) in the SC group (P = .01) (Figure 1 and Table 1).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Mean international normalized ratio (INR) at baseline and 8 and 24 hours after administration of phytonadione in the intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) groups. P = .70 for difference at baseline; P = .006 at 8 hours; and P = .009 at 24 hours. Mean decrease in INR from baseline for the IV and SC groups is 3.4 and 0.4 (P = .02) at 8 hours and 4.9 and 3.4 (P = .18) at 24 hours.



View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
INR at Baseline, 8 Hours, and 24 Hours for the 2 Groups*


At 8 and 24 hours, the 2 routes of administration had yielded significantly different INR levels. Within the IV group, the mean decrease in INR 8 hours after administration of phytonadione was 3.4 (range, -0.4 to 12.6), and the mean decrease in INR after 24 hours was 4.9 (range, 2.0-13.6). The means at baseline and the 2 subsequent observation times were all significantly different from each other. In the SC group, the means at baseline and at 8 hours were not significantly different. However, the mean INR at 24 hours was significantly lower than at the other 2 times. Between baseline and 8 hours, the mean change was 0.4 (range, -1.7 to 3.4). Comparing baseline to the 24-hour period, the reduction in INR was 3.4 (range, 0.9-7.3). There was a more rapid decrease in the INR by the IV route than with the SC route, but it did not achieve statistical significance (Figure 1).

At 8 hours, 9 of 11 patients in the IV group and 1 of 11 patients in the SC group had an INR of less than 5 (odds ratio, 45; 95% confidence interval, 3.47-58.3). Fisher exact test yielded an observed significance of .002 in comparing the 2 groups at this time. At 24 hours, 9 of 11 patients in the IV group and 7 of 11 patients in the SC group had an INR of less than 5 (odds ratio, 2.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-18.33). Excluding patients with INR of 10 or more (2 in the IV group and 3 in the SC group) did not change the results significantly.

No adverse drug reactions were observed after administration of phytonadione in either group. No bleeding was noted in any patient during the study period.


COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Patients and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Although there was no difference in the mean decrease in INR from baseline at 24 hours between the 2 groups, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups at 8 hours, with the IV group achieving a greater correction of INR. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the mean INR between the 2 groups both at 8 hours (4.6 vs 8.0) and at 24 hours (3.1 vs 5.0), IV administration again resulting in a lower INR.

While it is important to correct excessive prolongation of the INR, in patients who are not bleeding, this should be done without putting the patient at risk of treatment-related complications and without causing resistance to subsequent anticoagulation. Low doses of IV phytonadione (0.5 to 1 mg) effectively reverse excessive anticoagulation within 8 to 24 hours without causing subsequent resistance to anticoagulation.11-14 However, IV administration of phytonadione can be associated with serious adverse reactions, such as anaphylaxis and death. Although it is difficult to estimate the frequency of such reactions from a review of the literature, even a small risk of such reactions is unacceptable in a patient who is asymptomatic. The anaphylactic reaction is thought to be related to the presence of polyoxyethylated castor oil in the phytonadione preparation.7-9 Although a phytonadione formulation with mixed micelles that does not contain the polyoxyethylated fatty acids has been developed (Konakion [Roche Laboratories, Nutley, NJ] and Aquamephyton), it still contains a polyoxyethylated fatty acid derivative. Perhaps because of this, the Konakion brand of phytonadione was not approved for IV injections and is no longer available in this country. Aquamephyton brand of phytonadione comes with a product insert warning that IV administration can be associated with serious reactions and should be reserved for emergency situations only. Three studies have evaluated the effectiveness of small oral doses (1-2.5 mg) of phytonadione in correcting excessive anticoagulation. Pengo et al15 treated 11 patients with a mean INR of 5.82 (range, 5.26-7.5) with 2 mg of phytonadione orally while continuing the usual dose of warfarin. All 11 patients had an INR of less than 5 after 24 hours. In a retrospective study of 58 patients with an INR greater than 5, phytonadione in a dose of 2.5 mg given orally decreased the INR to less than 5 at 24 hours in 42 (72%).16 Crowther et al17 treated 62 patients with a mean INR of 5.79 with 1 mg of oral phytonadione in a prospective cohort study. The INR decreased to a mean of 2.86 within 16 hours in 59 patients. Another study compared low-dose IV (<=0.5 mg), high-dose IV (1-10 mg), 1 to 10 mg of SC, and 2.5 to 5 mg of oral phytonadione.18 Although all routes and doses were successful in decreasing the INR, it is difficult to draw any firm conclusions because of the variable dose and follow-up intervals in the different groups and within each group.

Our study shows that, although SC administration of 1 mg of phytonadione is effective in correcting excessive anticoagulation from warfarin therapy, the effect is neither as quick nor as complete as after IV administration. If the goal of therapy is to bring the INR rapidly to 5 or less, then SC administration of very small doses of phytonadione may not be very effective, since even at 24 hours, 4 of 11 patients in the SC group in our study had an INR greater than 5.

In conclusion, in patients who have excessive anticoagulation with warfarin, SC administration of very small doses of phytonadione may not correct the INR as rapidly and as effectively as IV administration. However, IV phytonadione may be associated with rare but serious anaphylactic reactions. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of slightly higher doses of phytonadione administered SC. Since this study was initiated, the Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic Therapy has revised its guidelines and recommends treating patients who have high INR without bleeding with oral phytonadione: 1 to 2.5 mg if the INR is above 5 but below 9 and a higher dose of 3 to 5 mg if the INR is above 9.19


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Patients and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Accepted for publication April 2, 1999.

The authors are indebted to Donald D. McIntire, PhD, for assisting with the statistical analysis and to Mark Feldman, MD, for critically reviewing the manuscript.

Reprints: Guna Raj, MD, Section of General Internal Medicine (111E), VA Medical Center, 4500 S Lancaster Rd, Dallas, TX 75216 (e-mail: raj.guna{at}dallas.va.gov).

From the Section of General Internal Medicine, Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (Drs Raj and Kumar); and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Ky (Dr McKinney).


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Patients and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

1. The European Atrial Fibrillation Trial Study Group. Optimal oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and recent cerebral ischemia. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:5-10. FREE FULL TEXT
2. Cannegieter SC, Rosendaal FR, Wintzen AR, van der Meer FJM, Vandenbroucke JP, Briet E. Optimal oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with mechanical heart valves. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:11-17. FREE FULL TEXT
3. van der Meer FJM, Rosendaal FR, Vandenbroucke JP, Briet E. Bleeding complications in oral anticoagulant therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:1557-1562. FREE FULL TEXT
4. Glover JJ, Morrill GB. Conservative treatment of overanticoagulated patients. Chest. 1995;108:987-990. FREE FULL TEXT
5. Rubia J, Grau E, Montserrat I, Paya A. Anaphylactic shock and vitamin K1 [letter]. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:943.
6. Lefrere JJ, Girot R. Acute cardiovascular collapse during intravenous vitamin K1 injection [letter]. Thromb Haemost. 1987;58:790. ISI | PUBMED
7. Havel M, Muller M, Graninger W, Kurz R, Lindemayr H. Tolerability of a new vitamin K1 preparation for parenteral administration to adults: one case of anaphylactoid administration. Clin Ther. 1987;9:373-379. ISI | PUBMED
8. Martin JC. Anaphylactoid reaction and vitamin K [letter]. Med J Aust. 1991;155:851.
9. Barash P, Kitahata LM, Mandel S. Acute cardiovascular collapse after intravenous phytonadione. Anesth Analg. 1976;55:304-306. FREE FULL TEXT
10. Hirsh J, Dalen JE, Deykin D, Poller L, Bussey H. Oral anticoagulants: mechanism of action, clinical effectiveness and optimal therapeutic range. Chest. 1995;108(suppl):231S-246S.
11. Shetty HGM, Backhouse G, Bentley DP, Routledge PA. Effective reversal of warfarin-induced excessive anticoagulation with low dose vitamin K1. Thromb Haemost. 1992;67:13-15. ISI | PUBMED
12. Perry DJ, Kimball DB. Low dose vitamin K for excessively anticoagulated prosthetic valve patients. Mil Med. 1982;147:836-837. ISI | PUBMED
13. Brophy MT, Fiore LD, Deykin D. Low dose vitamin K therapy in excessively anticoagulated patients: a dose finding study [abstract]. Thromb Haemost. 1995;73:1117.
14. Anderson P, Godal HC. Predictable reduction in anticoagulant activity of warfarin by small amounts of vitamin K. Acta Med Scand. 1975;198:269-270. ISI | PUBMED
15. Pengo V, Branzato A, Garelli E, Zasso A, Biasiolo A. Reversal of excessive effect of regular anticoagulation: low oral dose of phytonadione (vitamin K1) compared with warfarin discontinuation. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1993;4:739-741. ISI | PUBMED
16. Weibert RT, Le DT, Kayser SR, Rapaport SI. Correction of excessive anticoagulation with low-dose oral vitamin K1. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:959-962. FREE FULL TEXT
17. Crowther MA, Donovan D, Harrison L, McGinnis J, Ginsberg J. Low-dose oral vitamin K reliably reverses over-anticoagulation due to warfarin. Thromb Haemost. 1998;79:1116-1118. ISI | PUBMED
18. Whitling AM, Bussey HI, Lyons RM. Comparing different routes and doses of phytonadione for reversing excessive anticoagulation. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:2136-2140. FREE FULL TEXT
19. Hirsh J, Dalen JE, Anderson DR, et al. Oral anticoagulants: mechanism of action, clinical effectiveness, and optimal therapeutic range. Chest. 1998;114(suppl):445S-469S.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pharmacology and Management of the Vitamin K Antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Ansell et al.
Chest 2008;133:160S-198S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management of Excessive Anticoagulant Effect Due to Vitamin K Antagonists
Dentali and Crowther
ASH Education Book 2008;2008:266-270.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

REPRINT: Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Adults: 2007 Update: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists.
Broderick et al.
Circulation 2007;116:e391-e413.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Adults: 2007 Update: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists.
Broderick et al.
Stroke 2007;38:2001-2023.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antidote Use in the Critically Ill Poisoned Patient
Betten et al.
J Intensive Care Med 2006;21:255-277.
ABSTRACT  

Treatment of Excessive Anticoagulation With Phytonadione (Vitamin K): A Meta-analysis.
DeZee et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:391-397.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Timing of Fresh Frozen Plasma Administration and Rapid Correction of Coagulopathy in Warfarin-Related Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Goldstein et al.
Stroke 2006;37:151-155.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intracerebral Hemorrhage Associated With Oral Anticoagulant Therapy: Current Practices and Unresolved Questions
Steiner et al.
Stroke 2006;37:256-262.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Managing Complications of Anticoagulant Therapy
Smythe et al.
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2004;17:327-346.
ABSTRACT  

Management of Bleeding in Patients with Advanced Cancer
Pereira and Phan
The Oncologist 2004;9:561-570.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Pharmacology and Management of the Vitamin K Antagonists: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy
Ansell et al.
Chest 2004;126:204S-233S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Low-dose oral vitamin K therapy for the management of asymptomatic patients with elevated international normalized ratios: a brief review
Wilson et al.
CMAJ 2004;170:821-824.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Oral Vitamin K for Warfarin-Associated Coagulopathy
Weideman and Patel
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:610-610.
FULL TEXT  

A Survey of Oral Vitamin K Use by Anticoagulation Clinics
Libby and Garcia
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1893-1896.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Oral Vitamin K Lowers the International Normalized Ratio More Rapidly Than Subcutaneous Vitamin K in the Treatment of Warfarin-Associated Coagulopathy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Crowther et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2002;137:251-254.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Warfarin-Associated Coagulopathy : A Physician Survey
Wilson et al.
Chest 2001;120:1972-1976.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anticoagulation Therapy
Ginsberg et al.
ASH Education Book 2001;2001:339-357.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Managing Oral Anticoagulant Therapy
Ansell et al.
Chest 2001;119 :22S-38S.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.