You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 8, April 24, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Review Article
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (43)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Hospital Readmissions as a Measure of Quality of Health Care

Advantages and Limitations

Jochanan Benbassat, MD; Mark Taragin, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1074-1081.

ABSTRACT

We reviewed the recent literature on hospital readmissions and found that most of them are believed to be caused by patient frailty and progression of chronic disease. However, from 9% to 48% of all readmissions have been judged to be preventable because they were associated with indicators of substandard care during the index hospitalization, such as poor resolution of the main problem, unstable therapy at discharge, and inadequate postdischarge care. Furthermore, randomized prospective trials have shown that 12% to 75% of all readmissions can be prevented by patient education, predischarge assessment, and domiciliary aftercare. We conclude that most readmissions seem to be caused by unmodifiable causes, and that, pending an agreed-on method to adjust for confounders, global readmission rates are not a useful indicator of quality of care. However, high readmission rates of patients with defined conditions, such as diabetes and bronchial asthma, may identify quality-of-care problems. A focus on the specific needs of such patients may lead to the creation of more responsive health care systems for the chronically ill.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Materials and methods
 •Frequency and predictors of...
 •Frequency of potentially...
 •Effect of interventions aiming...
 •Hospital readmissions as an...
 •Directions for future research...
 •Author information
 •References

Hospitalizations account for about half of all health care expenses, and it has been estimated that 13% of the inpatients in the United States use more than half of all hospital resources through repeated admissions.1 During past decades, hospital readmissions have been the subject of retrospective surveys and prospective trials with a view to their prevention. Our objective is to review these studies and focus on the frequency of readmissions, their causes and validity as a measure of quality of care, and the attempts for their prevention.

Hospital readmissions cluster shortly after discharge and decline thereafter. About one third of them occur within a month of discharge, half of them within 90 days, and 80% within a year.1-3 The term readmission has been defined variously as a repeated hospitalization within 1,4-6 2,7-8 4,9 or 1210 months of discharge. Most preventable readmissions have been reported to occur early, within 1 month of discharge, and it has been suggested to adopt this time interval in comparative studies.9, 11 Still, early readmissions may also result from a nonpreventable progression of the disease or from a different diagnosis, whereas even late readmissions of diabetic or ashmatic patients may be preventable by appropriate ambulatory care. Therefore, although readily available from hospitals or health maintenance organizations,1, 6, 8, 12 data on global (all-cause) readmissions have a limited value in the assessment of quality of care. Indeed, after analyzing the data of the entire Medicare population, Gornick et al13 concluded that

"the development of the re-hospitalization data was the most complex part of the project . . . [R]e-hospitalizations after medical stays often indicated . . . the progression of disease, rather than discrete outcomes of care. . . . Therefore, [their] analysis . . . would require additional information not available from the Medicare data system."

The additional information needed to analyze readmissions can be acquired by a prospective follow-up of patients discharged from hospitals3, 14-15 or retrospective chart audits of patients admitted to hospitals.7, 10, 16 Although the yield of such studies in terms of detected preventable readmissions may be relatively low,2 they may identify prototypic errors and suggest ways to better practice. The cornerstone of the continuous quality improvement theory is that system adjustments yield high reward.17


MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Materials and methods
 •Frequency and predictors of...
 •Frequency of potentially...
 •Effect of interventions aiming...
 •Hospital readmissions as an...
 •Directions for future research...
 •Author information
 •References

We searched the literature (using "patient readmission" and "quality assurance, health care" as key terms) for articles published from January 1, 1991, through December 31, 1998, and the reference sections of the identified articles were further searched for additional sources on unscheduled readmissions. We excluded articles dealing with readmission to psychiatric and pediatric wards and restricted the survey to internal medicine and surgical departments, with a focus on the frequency of preventable readmissions, efficacy of interventions aiming at their prevention, and directions of future research.


FREQUENCY AND PREDICTORS OF HOSPITAL READMISSIONS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Materials and methods
 •Frequency and predictors of...
 •Frequency of potentially...
 •Effect of interventions aiming...
 •Hospital readmissions as an...
 •Directions for future research...
 •Author information
 •References

The causes of readmissions may be inferred from differences in their rates among various patient populations. Of all discharges from general acute care hospitals, the proportion of readmissions has been reported to be 5% to 14% after 1 month2, 5, 18-19 and 32% to 49% after 1 year.2, 20 Somewhat higher rates have been reported for geriatric patients, ie, 12% to 16% after 1 month,6, 16, 21-23 60% to 64% after 6 months,24-25 and 34% to 67% after 1 year.10, 16, 23, 26 The highest readmission rates have been observed in "high-risk" or severely ill geriatric patients, mostly with heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,27 ie, 35% after 1 month,28 26% to 44% after 4 to 6 months,29-30 and 70% after 1 year31 (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Hospital Readmission Rates Reported Since 1990 by Patient Population


Readmission rates have also varied according to demographic, social, and disease-related characteristics.32 A meta-analysis of 44 studies published before 1990 revealed that age, length of stay during the index hospitalization, and previous use of hospital resources were among the main independent predictors of readmissions.33 Other authors have identified as predictors of readmissions male sex,8, 34 white race,8 supplemental Medicaid coverage,8 low socioeconomic status,35-37 single marital status,38 psychiatric comorbidity,39 behavioral problems,35 diagnosis34, 40-44 (Table 2), the severity of the illness,45 nutritional status,29, 46-47 comorbidity,34 and length of stay during the index hospitalization.8, 34, 48


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 2. Hospital Readmission Rates Reported Since 1990 by Diagnosis


These findings indicate that patient-specific factors predict readmissions. Patient-specific factors could be independent and nonmodifiable risk indicators of readmissions; on the other hand, they could be markers of other, modifiable factors. For example, readmissions could be related to advancing age because of noncompliance with medication regimen or inappropriate home care. In other words, an apparently patient-specific factor may reflect a failure to provide adequate health care.

The existence of modifiable factors of readmissions is suggested by their geographic variability. Regardless of the initial cause of the admission and its severity, Medicare beneficiaries had consistently higher rates of readmission in Boston, Mass, than did Medicare beneficiaries in New Haven, Conn,49 possibly because of variability in practice habits due to hospital-bed availability. Modifiable factors of readmissions are suggested also by their variability according to discharge destination. A study of a national sample of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or dementia revealed that after adjusting for severity and clinical and demographic characteristics, patients discharged to nursing homes were less likely to be readmitted within 30 days after discharge than those discharged to personal homes.44 Finally, some studies have found an association between readmission rates and inappropriate care during the index hospitalization. A case-control study revealed that 5 criteria of inpatient care (resolution of main problem, adequacy of the postdischarge destination, stability of doses of therapy, and appropriate timing of the first follow-up visit) predicted readmissions within 30 days.50 Another case-control study found that a set of disease-specific, explicit criteria of appropriateness of care51-52 predicted readmissions.53 It has been suggested that 1 of 7 readmissions in patients with diabetes, 1 of 5 readmissions in patients with heart failure, and 1 of 12 readmissions in patients with obstructive lung disease were attributable to substandard care.53 Absence of documentation of discharge planning, increased temperature, intravenous fluids on the day of discharge, or unaddressed abnormal test results at discharge were related to an increased subsequent mortality.6 A meta-analysis of 29 studies published from 1975 through 1993 confirmed that low-quality inpatient care during the index hospitalization increased the risk of subsequent readmissions.4 At least some readmissions, therefore, are associated with modifiable factors.


FREQUENCY OF POTENTIALLY PREVENTABLE READMISSIONS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Materials and methods
 •Frequency and predictors of...
 •Frequency of potentially...
 •Effect of interventions aiming...
 •Hospital readmissions as an...
 •Directions for future research...
 •Author information
 •References

Of all readmissions, the proportion of those judged on retrospective chart audits to be preventable has varied from 9% to 50%9-10,21-22,54-56 (Table 3), and the meta-analysis by Ashton et al4 revealed that as many as 55% of the readmissions could be due to poor-quality and theoretically modifiable care during the index hospitalization. In contrast, the percentage of preventable hospital admissions in general (whether first or recurrent), has been estimated to be 9%,57 20%,58 21%,59 or 23%.60


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 3. Proportion of Unplanned Readmissions Judged to Be Potentially Preventable


The variability in estimated proportions of preventable readmissions could be caused by the limited reliability of the identification of a readmission as preventable. A study of 713 discharges revealed 109 (15.3%) unscheduled readmissions within 28 days. A review by 2 evaluators identified 34 (31%) of these readmissions as preventable. A second audit by another team of physicians identified only 16 (15%) of the same readmissions as preventable.21 Another study similarly found that the agreement between evaluators of readmissions was moderate ({kappa}=0.43).56 A second possible explanation of the variability in the proportion of readmissions judged to be preventable is differences in the quality of care provided in various hospitals. Thus, an audit of 811 readmissions judged 277 (34%) of them as preventable. Hospital system factors accounted for 37%; clinician factors, 38%; and patient factors, 21%. Nine hospitals differed markedly in their profile of reasons for preventable readmissions,56 and hospitals with higher-than-expected readmission rates of patients with a given diagnostic entity were also more likely to have a high readmission rate in the next year.61 It may therefore be concluded that from 9% to 55% of the readmissions are due to inappropriate care during or after the index admission.


EFFECT OF INTERVENTIONS AIMING TO REDUCE READMISSIONS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Materials and methods
 •Frequency and predictors of...
 •Frequency of potentially...
 •Effect of interventions aiming...
 •Hospital readmissions as an...
 •Directions for future research...
 •Author information
 •References

Readmission rates have been reported to decline after the implementation of predischarge reviews and improved follow-up after discharge.18, 62-63 However, nonexperimental, before-after study designs are subject to confounding and to regression toward the mean. Confounding refers to changes beyond the planned intervention that occurred over time and that in and of themselves may have reduced readmission rates. Regression to the mean is the tendency of above-average rates to fall toward average over time. Since programs aiming to reduce readmission rates are likely to be implemented in institutions with high readmission rates, their favorable results may reflect a decline that would have occurred on subsequent determinations even without any specific interventions.

Confounding and regression toward the mean can be averted by randomized controlled studies. Soeken et al33 reviewed 12 controlled studies of the efficacy of planned interventions in reducing readmissions, published from 1980 through 1990. All but 4 of them found lower readmission rates in the intervention group. Table 4 and Table 5 summarize 19 studies published since 1991,5, 16, 19-20,24-26,28, 30-31,40-42,64-69 all but 3 of them randomized. A 12% to 75% reduction in readmissions or in emergency visits was found in 14 of these 19 studies. Another study compared 2 control and 2 intervention hospitals to evaluate a utilization management program. The results indicated that both intervention hospitals and 1 control hospital had lower 30-day readmission rates after the intervention than before.5 The remaining 4 studies detected either no differences in readmissions between control and intervention patients19-20,64 or even higher readmission rates in the intervention group.30


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 4. Planned Interventions to Reduce Readmission Rates in Unselected Acute Care or Geriatric Patients in Prospective Controlled Studies Since 1991



View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 5. Planned Interventions to Reduce Readmission Rates in Patients With Specific Disorders in Prospective Controlled Studies Since 1991


The effect on mortality of interventions aiming to reduce readmission rates was reported in 7 studies.16, 20, 24-25,42, 64, 68 Three of them found that the intervention was associated with a 25%,42 70%,25 and 80%68 decline in mortality. Costs and length of hospital stay were reported to have been reduced in 5 of a total of 7 studies. None, however, studied cost-effectiveness. Most intervention studies reviewed by Eggert and Friedman70 were not cost-effective. Safran and Phillips71 used decision analysis to examine the cost-effectiveness of interventions aiming to prevent readmissions. The authors considered the following 3 strategies: no intervention, intervention for all patients, and intervention for patients at high risk for readmission. They found that an intervention that costs $250 per patient would reduce overall costs for high-risk patients if its success rate exceeded 9% and for all patients if its success rate exceeded 17%. Predischarge reviews and improved postdischarge care, therefore, may prevent readmissions, although their cost-effectiveness is uncertain.


HOSPITAL READMISSIONS AS AN INDICATOR OF QUALITY OF CARE
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Materials and methods
 •Frequency and predictors of...
 •Frequency of potentially...
 •Effect of interventions aiming...
 •Hospital readmissions as an...
 •Directions for future research...
 •Author information
 •References

The findings concerning the effect of interventions indicate that improved hospital and postdischarge care are associated with fewer readmissions. Still, there is evidence that global readmission rates have a limited value as indicators of quality of care. For example, about half of the studies reviewed by Ashton et al4 failed to uncover any relationship between quality of care and readmissions. In all clinical conditions studied by Thomas,43 readmission rates of patients who received poor-quality care were similar to those of patients whose care was judged acceptable. Similarly, Roe et al72 assessed risk-adjusted outcomes after renal failure, gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage, stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure and concluded that length of stay, death, and unplanned readmission were predicted mainly by age, severity, and comorbidity. Hayward et al73 reviewed 675 general medicine hospital admissions and found that care of 30% of the patients who died in hospital, but only 10% of those discharged alive, could be rated as substandard; on the other hand, patients who had subsequent early readmissions did not have poorer quality of care ratings than those without early readmissions. DesHarnais et al74 developed and validated 3 risk-adjusted indices of hospital quality: mortality, readmissions, and complications. They ranked 300 hospitals on each index, and found no relationship between a hospital's ranking on any one of these indices and its ranking on the other two. Finally, a Monte Carlo simulation indicated that readmission rates were a poor measure of quality.75

As with all diagnostic tests, measures of quality of health care may identify incorrectly some medical interventions as inappropriate when they are actually appropriate, and vice versa.76 Therefore, it appears that this is true also for readmissions, and punitive measures based on high readmission rates may penalize hospitals without ample reason.77 However, the uncertain validity of global readmission rates as an indicator of quality of care does not preclude efforts for their reduction. Hospital readmissions raise concern among health care providers, and therefore efforts for their reduction are likely to be endorsed by clinicians and administrators.


DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Materials and methods
 •Frequency and predictors of...
 •Frequency of potentially...
 •Effect of interventions aiming...
 •Hospital readmissions as an...
 •Directions for future research...
 •Author information
 •References

The survey of controlled studies of the efficacy of planned interventions in reducing readmissions demonstrated a significant improvement in outcome of care in all 6 studies, which focused on patients with defined disorders (Table 5), but only in 6 of 10 studies of patients with various chronic disorders (Table 4). This finding suggests that a focus on patients with defined disorders may yield a higher reward in terms of improved patient care than attempts to reduce readmissions in the general inpatient population.

We believe that future research will focus on readmissions of inpatients with specific conditions, such as labor and child birth,78 coronary artery bypass grafting,79 uncontrolled pain,80 traumatic spinal cord injury,81 or acute coronary disease.82 A scrutiny of the causes of these readmissions may lead to an identification of unmet clinical, educational, and psychosocial needs. Once defined, research will focus on possible ways to meet these needs. There is already evidence of the benefit of interventions combining clinical expertise with coordinated care of patients with specific chronic disorders, such as bronchial asthma,65, 67 heart failure,40-42,68 and diabetes,69 for which there are processes of care known to affect outcomes. The specific features of these interventions are patient education, close follow-up, home monitoring, medication adjustment, and regular communication with clinical experts.83 Approaches that ensure closer adherence to evidence-based guidelines and meet patient self-management needs may improve clinical outcomes and reduce health care expenditures.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Materials and methods
 •Frequency and predictors of...
 •Frequency of potentially...
 •Effect of interventions aiming...
 •Hospital readmissions as an...
 •Directions for future research...
 •Author information
 •References

Accepted for publication July 12, 1999.

Corresponding author: Jochanan Benbassat, MD, JDC Brookdale Institute, PO Box 13087, Jerusalem 91130, Israel (e-mail: benbasat{at}jdc.org.il).

From the Health Policy Research Program, JDC Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem, Israel.


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Materials and methods
 •Frequency and predictors of...
 •Frequency of potentially...
 •Effect of interventions aiming...
 •Hospital readmissions as an...
 •Directions for future research...
 •Author information
 •References

1. Zook CJ, Moore FD. High cost users of medical care. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:996-1002. ABSTRACT
2. Corrigan JM, Kazandjian VA. Characteristics of multiple admissions. J Am Med Rec Assoc. 1991;62:37-47.
3. Henderson J, Graveney MJ, Goldacre MJ. Should emergency readmissions be used as health service indicators and in medical audit? Health Serv Manage Res. 1993;6:109-116. PUBMED
4. Ashton CM, Del Junco DJ, Souchek S, Wray NP, Mansyur CL. The association between quality of inpatient care and early readmission: a meta-analysis of the evidence. Med Care. 1997;35:1044-1059. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
5. Cardiff K, Anderson G, Sheps S. Evaluation of a hospital-based utilization management program. Healthc Manage Forum. 1995;8:38-45. PUBMED
6. Wei F, Mark D, Hartz A, Campbell C. Are PRO discharge screens associated with postdischarge adverse outcomes? Health Serv Res. 1995;30:489-506. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
7. Wilkins PS, Beckett MW. Audit of unexpected return visits to an accident and emergency department. Arch Emerg Med. 1992;9:352-356. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
8. Anderson GF, Steinberg EP. Predicting hospital readmissions in the Medicare population. Inquiry. 1985;22:251-258. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
9. Frankl SE, Breeling JL, Goldman L. Preventability of emergent hospital readmission. Am J Med. 1991;90:667-674. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
10. Kelly JF, McDowell H, Crawford V, Stout RW. Readmissions to a geriatric medical unit: is prevention possible? Aging Milano. 1992;4:61-67. PUBMED
11. Sibbritt DW. Validation of a 28 day interval between discharge and readmission for emergency readmission rates. J Qual Clin Pract. 1995;15:211-220. PUBMED
12. Krakauer H, Bailey RC, Cooper H, Yu WK, Skellan KJ, Kattakkuzhy G. The systematic assessment of variations in medical practices and their outcomes. Public Health Rep. 1995;110:2-12. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
13. Gornick M, Lubitz J, Riley G. US initiatives and approaches for outcomes and effectiveness research. Health Policy. 1991;17:209-225. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
14. Hardwick RH, Saltrese-Taylor A, Collins CD. Need to measure outcome after discharge in surgical audit. Qual Health Care. 1992;1:165-167. FREE FULL TEXT
15. Seagroatt V, Tan HS, Goldacre M, Bulstrode C, Nugent I, Gill L. Elective total hip replacement: incidence, emergency readmission rate, and postoperative mortality. BMJ. 1991;303:1431-1435.
16. Townsend J, Dyer S, Cooper J, Meade T, Piper M, Frank A. Emergency hospital admissions and readmissions of patients aged over 75 years and the effects of a community-based discharge scheme. Health Trends. 1992;24:136-139. PUBMED
17. Berwick DM. Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:53-56. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
18. Bean P, Waldron K. Readmission study leads to continuum of care. Nurs Manage. 1995;26:65, 67-68.
19. Einstadter D, Cebul RD, Franta PR. Effect of a nurse case manager on postdischarge follow-up. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:684-688. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
20. Fitzgerald JF, Smith DM, Martin DK, Freedman JA, Katz BP. A case manager intervention to reduce readmissions. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1721-1729. FREE FULL TEXT
21. Gautam P, Macduff C, Brown I, Squair J. Unplanned readmissions of elderly patients. Health Bull (Edinb). 1996;54:449-457.
22. Haines-Wood J, Gilmore DH, Beringer TR. Readmission of elderly patients after in-patient rehabilitation. Ulster Med J. 1996;65:142-144. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
23. Hennen J, Krumholz HM, Radford MJ, Meehan TP. Readmission rates, 30 days and 365 days post-discharge, among the 20 most frequent DRG groups, Medicare inpatients age 65 or older in Connecticut hospitals, fiscal years 1991, 1992, and 1993. Conn Med. 1995;59:263-270. PUBMED
24. Hansen FR, Poulsen H, Srensen KH. A model of regular geriatric follow-up by home visits to selected patients discharged from a geriatric ward: a randomized controlled trial. Aging (Milano). 1995;7:202-206. PUBMED
25. Thomas DR, Brahan R, Haywood BP. Inpatient community-based geriatric assessment reduces subsequent mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993;41:101-104. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
26. Lokk J, Arnetz B. Impact on health care consumption of an experimental daycare intervention. Scand J Caring Sci. 1994;8:95-98. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
27. Shipton S. Risk factors associated with multiple hospital readmissions. Home Care Provid. 1996;1:83-85. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
28. Evans RL, Hendricks RD. Evaluating hospital discharge planning: a randomized clinical trial. Med Care. 1993;31:358-370. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
29. Friedmann JM, Jensen GL, Smiciklas-Wright H, McCamish MA. Predicting early nonelective hospital readmission in nutritionally compromised older adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65:1714-1720. FREE FULL TEXT
30. Weinberger M, Oddone EZ, Henderson WG. Does increased access to primary care reduce hospital readmissions? Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Primary Care and Hospital Readmission. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1441-1447. FREE FULL TEXT
31. Martin F, Oyewole A, Moloney A. A randomized controlled trial of a high support hospital discharge team for elderly people. Age Ageing. 1994;23:228-234. FREE FULL TEXT
32. Wray NP, DeBehnke RD, Ashton CM, Dunn JK. Characteristics of the recurrently hospitalized adult: an information synthesis. Med Care. 1988;26:1046-1056. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
33. Soeken KL, Prescott PA, Herron DG, Creasia J. Predictors of hospital readmission: a meta-analysis. Eval Health Prof. 1991;14:262-281. FREE FULL TEXT
34. Krumholz HM, Parent EM, Tu N, et al. Readmissions after hospitalization for congestive heart failure among Medicare beneficiaries. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:99-104. FREE FULL TEXT
35. Kovacs M, Charron-Prochownik D, Obrosky DS. A longitudinal study of biomedical and psychosocial predictors of multiple hospitalizations among young people with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 1995;12:142-148. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
36. Watson JP, Cowen P, Lewis RA. The relationship between asthma admission rates, routes of admission, and socioeconomic deprivation. Eur Respir J. 1996;9:2087-2093. ABSTRACT
37. Weissman JS, Stern RS, Epstein AM. The impact of patient socioeconomic status and other social factors on readmission: a prospective study in four Massachusetts hospitals. Inquiry. 1994;31:163-172. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
38. Berkman B, Millar S, Holmes W, Bonander E. Predicting elderly cardiac patients at risk for readmission. Soc Work Health Care. 1991;16:21-38. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
39. Saravay SM, Pollack S, Steinberg MD, Weinschel B, Habert M. Four-year follow-up of the influence of psychological co-morbidity on medical re-hospitalization. Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153:397-403. FREE FULL TEXT
40. Schneider JK, Hornberger S, Booker J, Davis A, Kralicek R. A medication discharge planning program: measuring the effect on readmissions. Clin Nurs Res. 1993;2:41-53. FREE FULL TEXT
41. Naylor M, Brooten D, Jones R, Lavizzo-Mourey R, Mezey M, Pauly M. Comprehensive discharge planning for the hospitalized elderly: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:999-1006. FREE FULL TEXT
42. Rich MW, Beckham V, Wittenberg C, Leven CL, Freedland KE, Carney RM. A multidisciplinary intervention to prevent the readmission of elderly patients with congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1190-1195. FREE FULL TEXT
43. Thomas JW. Does risk-adjusted readmission rate provide valid information on hospital quality? Inquiry. 1996;33:258-270. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
44. Camberg LC, Smith NE, Beaudet M, Daley J, Cagan M, Thibault G. Discharge destination and repeat hospitalizations. Med Care. 1997;35:756-767. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
45. Burns R, Nichols LO. Factors predicting readmission of older general medicine patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:389-393. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
46. Sullivan DH. Risk factors for early hospital readmission in a select population of geriatric rehabilitation patients: the significance of nutritional status. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:792-798. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
47. Chima CS, Barco K, Dewitt ML, Maeda M, Teran JC, Mullen KD. Relationship of nutritional status to length of stay, hospital costs, and discharge status of patients hospitalized in the medicine service. J Am Diet Assoc. 1997;97:975-978. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
48. Corrigan JM, Martin JB. Identification of factors associated with hospital readmission and development of a predictive model. Health Serv Res. 1992;27:81-101. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
49. Fisher ES, Wennberg JE, Stukel TA, Sharp SM. Hospital readmission rates for cohorts of Medicare beneficiaries in Boston and New Haven. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:989-995. FREE FULL TEXT
50. Ashton CM, Wray NP, Dunn JK, Scheurich JW, DeBehnke RD, Friedland JA. Predicting readmission in veterans with chronic disease: development and validation of discharge criteria. Med Care. 1987;25:1184-1189. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
51. Ashton CM, Kuykendall DH, Johnson ML, et al. A method of developing and weighting explicit process of care criteria for quality assessment. Med Care. 1994;32:755-770. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
52. Wray NP, Ashton CM, Kuykendall DH, Petersen NJ, Souchek J, Hollingsworth JC. Selecting disease-outcome pairs for monitoring the quality of hospital care. Med Care. 1995;33:75-89. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
53. Ashton CM, Kuykendall DH, Johnson ML, Wray NP, Wu L. The association between the quality of inpatient care and early readmission. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:415-421. FREE FULL TEXT
54. Graham H, Livesley B. Can readmissions to a geriatric medical unit be prevented? Lancet. 1983;1:404-406. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
55. Chaput-Toupin E, Czernichow P, Froment L, Barco P, Desechalliers JP. Are early unforseen rehospitalizations inevitable? Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1996;44:221-227. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
56. Oddone EZ, Weinberger M, Horner M, et al. Classifying general medicine readmissions: are they preventable? Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies in Health Services Group on Primary Care and Hospital Readmissions. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:597-607. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
57. Bigby JA, Dunn J, Goldman L, et al. Assessing the preventability of emergency hospital admissions. Am J Med. 1987;83:1031-1036. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
58. Lovejoy F, Carper J, Janeway C, Kosa J. Unnecessary and preventable hospitalizations: report of an internal audit. J Pediatr. 1971;79:868-877. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
59. Mason WB, Bedwell CL, Zwaag RV, Runyan JW. Why people are hospitalized: a description of preventable factors leading to admission for medical illness. Med Care. 1980;18:147-163. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
60. Siu AL, Sonnenberg FA, Manning WG, et al. Inappropriate use of hospitals in a randomized trial of health insurance plans. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:1259-1266. ABSTRACT
61. Wray NP, Petersen NJ, Souchek J, Ashton CM, Hollingsworth JC. Application of an analystic model to early readmission rates within the Department of Veteran Affairs. Med Care. 1997;35:768-781. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
62. Smith CS. The impact of an ambulatory firm system on quality and continuity of care. Med Care. 1995;33:221-226. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
63. Lasater M. The effect of a nurse-managed CHF clinic on patient readmission and length of stay. Home Healthc Nurse. 1996;14:351-356. PUBMED
64. Siu AL, Kravitz RL, Keeler E, et al. Postdischarge geriatric assessment of hospitalized frail elderly patients. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:76-81. FREE FULL TEXT
65. Mayo PH, Richman J, Harris HW. Results of a program to reduce admissions for adult asthma. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:864-871.
66. Hassell JT, Games AD, Shaffer B, Harkins LE. Nutrition support team management of enterally fed patients in a community hospital is cost-beneficial. J Am Diet Assoc. 1994;94:993-998. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
67. Madge P, McColl J, Paton J. Impact of a nurse-led home management training programme in children admitted to hospital with acute asthma: a randomized controlled study. Thorax. 1997;52:223-228. ABSTRACT
68. Stewart S, Pearson S, Horowitz JD. Effects of a home-based intervention among patients with congestive heart failure discharged from acute hospital care. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1067-1072. FREE FULL TEXT
69. Aubert RE, Herman WH, Waters J, et al. Nurse case management to improve glycemic control in diabetic patients in a health maintenance organization: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:605-612. FREE FULL TEXT
70. Eggert GM, Friedman B. The need for special interventions for multiple hospital admission patients. Health Care Financ Rev. 1988;19(suppl):57-67.
71. Safran C, Phillips RS. Interventions to prevent readmission: the constraints of cost and efficacy. Med Care. 1989;27:204-211. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
72. Roe CJ, Kulinskaya E, Brisbane M, Brown R, Barter C. A methodology for measuring clinical outcomes in an acute care teaching hospital. J Qual Clin Pract. 1996;16:203-214. PUBMED
73. Hayward RA, Bernard AM, Rosevear JS, Anderson JE, McMahon LF. An evaluation of generic screens for poor quality of hospital care on a general medicine service. Med Care. 1993;31:394-402. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
74. DesHarnais S, McMahon LF, Wroblewski R. Measuring outcomes of hospital care using multiple risk-adjusted indexes. Health Serv Res. 1991;26:425-445. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
75. Hofer TP, Hayward RA. Can early readmission rates accurately detect poor-quality hospitals? Med Care. 1995;33:234-245. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
76. Phelps CE. The methodological foundations of studies of the appropriateness of medical care. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1241-1245. FREE FULL TEXT
77. Panzer RJ. Hospital readmissions and quality of care [editorial and comment]. Am J Med. 1991;90:665-666. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
78. Romano PS, Zach A, Luft HS, Rainwater J, Remy LL, Campa D. The California Hospital Outcomes Project: using administrative data to compare hospital performance. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995;21:668-682. PUBMED
79. Beggs VL, Birkemeyer NJ, Nugent WC, Dacey LJ, O'Connor GT. Factors related to rehospitalization within thirty days of discharge after coronary artery bypass grafting. Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc. 1996;1:180-186. PUBMED
80. Grant M, Ferrell BR, Rivera LM, Lee J. Unscheduled readmissions for uncontrolled symptoms: a health care challenge for nurses. Nurs Clin North Am. 1995;30:673-682. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
81. Samsa GP, Landsman PB, Hamilton B. Inpatient hospital utilization among veterans with traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:1037-1043. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
82. Stewart S, Voss DW. A study of unplanned readmissions to a coronary care unit. Heart Lung. 1997;26:196-203. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
83. Wagner EH. More than a case manager. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:654-655. FREE FULL TEXT


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(8):1206-1207.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Validation of data and indicators in the Danish Cholecystectomy Database
Harboe et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2009;21:160-168.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predictors of Early Hospital Readmission After Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Aujesky et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:287-293.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Incidence and main factors associated with early unplanned hospital readmission among French medical inpatients aged 75 and over admitted through emergency units
Laniece et al.
Age Ageing 2008;37:416-422.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Hospitalist Movement -- Time to Move On
McMahon
NEJM 2007;357:2627-2629.
FULL TEXT  

Trends in Hospitalization and Sociodemographic Factors in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Populations in Germany: National Health Survey, 1990-1992 and 1998
Icks et al.
AJPH 2006;96:1656-1661.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Potentially Preventable Readmissions: The Case of Diabetes
Jiang et al.
AJPH 2005;95:1561-1567.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Rate and Cost of Hospital Readmissions for Preventable Conditions
Friedman and Basu
Med Care Res Rev 2004;61:225-240.
ABSTRACT  

One More Turn of the Wrench
Herndon
JBJS 2003;85:2036-2048.
FULL TEXT  

Measuring readmissions: focus on the time factor
HEGGESTAD and LILLEENG
Int J Qual Health Care 2003;15:147-154.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events Affecting Patients after Discharge from the Hospital
Forster et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:161-167.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Depressive Symptoms as a Predictor of 6-Month Outcomes and Services Utilization in Elderly Medical Inpatients
Bula et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2609-2615.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.