You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 1, January 8, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (46)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Sleep Disturbance and Obesity

Changes Following Surgically Induced Weight Loss

John B. Dixon, MBBS, FRACGP; Linda M. Schachter, MBBS, FRACP; Paul E. O'Brien, MD, FRACS

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:102-106.

ABSTRACT

Background  Obesity causes sleep disturbance and is the most significant risk factor for sleep apnea. Only surgical methods provide substantial sustained weight loss for most severely obese subjects.

Objective  To study sleep disturbance in patients undergoing laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding with a commercially available product (Lap-Band).

Methods  In this study, 313 consecutive patients with severe obesity (body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters] >35) completed a preoperative sleep questionnaire and clinical assessment. One hundred twenty-three patients completed the same assessment 12 months after surgery. The characteristics of sleep disturbance and changes in responses to weight loss have been assessed.

Results  There was a high prevalence of significantly disturbed sleep in men (59%) and women (45%), with women less likely to have had their sleep disturbance investigated. Observed sleep apnea was more common in men, but daytime sleepiness was not affected by sex. Waist circumference was the best clinical measure predicting observed sleep apnea (R = 0.36; P<.001). The group lost an average of 48% (SD, 16%) of excess weight by 12 months. There was a significant improvement in the responses to all questions at follow-up, with habitual snoring reduced to 14% (preoperative value, 82%), observed sleep apnea to 2% (preoperative value, 33%), abnormal daytime sleepiness to 4% (preoperative value, 39%), and poor sleep quality to 2% (preoperative value, 39%) (P<.001 for all).

Conclusions  Obesity-related sleep disorders improve markedly with weight loss. Sustainable weight loss should be a primary aim in the management of severely obese patients with significant sleep disturbance, including sleep apnea. Low-risk laparoscopic obesity surgery should be considered for selected patients with this important comorbidity.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Patients and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

SLEEP-DISORDERED breathing (SDB), particularly in the form of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), occurs in approximately 4% of men and 2% of women in the general population.1 Obesity, especially upper body obesity, is considered a major risk factor for OSA, and clinical assessments and sleep studies1 indicate a prevalence of OSA in very severe obesity (ie, body mass index [BMI] [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters] >40) to be 42% to 48% in men and 8% to 38% in women.

Sleep-disordered breathing is recognized as a major health problem and, with the increasing prevalence of severe obesity, it is likely that the prevalence of SDB is also likely to increase. Obstructive sleep apnea, with its associated increase in daytime sleepiness, has been linked to marked psychosocial morbidity,2 cognitive dysfunction,3 and a greater likelihood of involvement in motor vehicle crashes.4 In addition, obese patients without SDB have a significant increase in sleep disturbance and daytime sleepiness compared with nonobese control subjects, possibly related to metabolic or circadian disturbance.5, 6 Obesity is also associated with other conditions that cause sleep disruption, such as asthma,7 gastroesophageal reflux,8 osteoarthritis,9 and nocturia.10

Many studies11, 12, 13, 14 have shown that there are major improvements in sleep disturbance and SDB in obese subjects associated with weight loss. These improvements are consistent for medical, dietary, and surgical methods of weight loss.11, 12, 13, 14 Sleep disturbance understandably recurs with weight gain.

This study assesses the prevalence of sleep disturbance and daytime sleepiness in a group of morbidly obese subjects presenting for weight loss surgery and assesses changes that have occurred with weight loss.


PATIENTS AND METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Patients and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Patients with a BMI greater than 35; with significant medical, physical, or psychosocial disabilities; and who have attempted weight reduction by other means for at least 5 years were considered for surgery using an adjustable gastric banding system (Lap-Band; BioEnterics Corporation, Carpinteria, Calif).

The form of gastric restrictive surgery used involves the laparoscopic placement of an adjustable silicone band 2 to 3 cm below the gastroesophageal junction. Food within the small pouch of the stomach and above the band produces an early sense of satiety, thereby weight loss. The band has a balloon incorporated in its inner wall, and this is attached via tubing to a subcutaneous reservoir. Adjustments to gastric restriction are made by adding or removing isotonic sodium chloride solution from the reservoir.

Preoperative assessment included a medical assessment, including history of any diagnosed sleep disorder, previous sleep studies, and use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure, and a questionnaire on sleep symptoms and quality of sleep. The questionnaire inquired about habitual snoring, observed sleep apnea, and nocturnal choking. Patients also indicated subjective sleep quality and the presence of morning headaches or tiredness on waking. Responses to the written questionnaire were reassessed at clinical interview, where responses were clarified and the nature of sleep disturbance explored. Clarification of who observed habitual snoring, sleep apnea, and nocturnal choking was obtained from all patients, and input from the sleep partner and household members was encouraged. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), a validated instrument that measures daytime sleepiness, was also completed.15, 16 The community norm mean ± SD score is 4.0 ± 3.0, with excessive daytime sleepiness defined as an ESS score of greater than 10. Patients were considered to have significant sleep disturbance if they reported habitual snoring and poor sleep quality, habitual snoring and an ESS score of greater than 10, or habitual snoring and observed sleep apnea. Anthropometric measurements, including weight, height, neck circumference (measured at the level of the cricothyroid cartilage), and waist and hip measurements, were taken preoperatively and at yearly follow-up. Correlations between preoperative sleep disturbance and preoperative clinical and biochemical features were assessed.

Preoperative excess weight is calculated as the weight (in kilograms) at the time of surgery less the ideal weight (in kilograms), as measured by the Metropolitan Life Tables (1985). Percentage of excess weight loss is calculated by dividing the weight loss by the excess weight preoperatively, multiplied by 100.

The appropriate hospital ethics review board approved the questionnaires used. All patients gave preoperative written informed consent to the procedure and follow-up requirements.

Mean ESS scores were obtained, and a paired 2-sided t test was used to test the significance of differences. A {chi}2 test was used to test the significance of differences between categorical variables and responses to the questionnaire. Data are given as mean ± SD. Bivariate, binary logistic, and stepwise linear regression analysis, using a statistical software package,17 was used to assess for clinical correlation with significant sleep disturbance, significant sleep apnea, and ESS score. P<.05 was considered significant.


RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Patients and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

The preoperative characteristics of the 313 consecutive study patients are shown in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Patient Demographic Characteristics Before Surgery*


PREOPERATIVE SLEEP DATA

Observed Sleep Apnea

The reported incidence of habitual snoring (Table 2) was high in men and women, with observed sleep apnea in men and women being more than 10 times that reported in the adult community. Men reported a higher incidence of observed sleep apnea, habitual snoring, and nocturnal choking, but there was no difference in reported daytime tiredness, daytime sleepiness, and poor sleep quality between men and women (Table 2). The mean ESS scores in men and women were 9.0 (SD, 5.8) and 8.4 (SD, 4.8), respectively, both significantly higher than the community normal score of 4 (P<.001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 2. Prevalence of Self-Reported Sleep Disturbance in Patients Presenting for Surgery*


Ninety-five patients (30%) reported habitual snoring and excessive daytime sleepiness (ESS score of >10). In this group, 52 (55%) reported observed sleep apnea; 48 (51%), poor sleep quality; and 62 (65%), morning headaches. Only 22 (23%) of these patients had their sleep disturbance investigated before referral for obesity surgery, and significantly more of the men than women (50% [11/22] vs 15% [11/71]; P<.01) underwent polysomnography.

Male sex (P<.001), high BMI (P<.001), and high waist-hip ratio (P = .001) are significant independent predictors of self-reported sleep apnea. However, the best predictor was waist circumference (R = 0.36; P<.001), and no other factors, including sex, were predictive after correcting for this. Sleep apnea was reported by 42% (45/108) of those with a waist circumference of 126 cm (median) or above and in 10% (10/102) of those with a waist circumference below this value. Figure 1 shows a linear relation of reported sleep apnea for each quartile of waist circumference. Several biochemical measurements were also predictive, including a high plasma insulin level (R = 0.15; P = .03) and a low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (R = 0.17; P = .01), but did not explain any significant variance when controlled for the waist circumference.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 1. The prevalence of reported OSA vs quartiles of waist circumference. There were only 3 men in Q2 (1 reported OSA) and none in Q1. The correlation coefficient for observed OSA vs waist circumference is R= 0.36 (P<.001). OSA indicates obstructive sleep apnea; Q1, quartile 1; Q2, quartile 2; Q3, quartile 3; and Q4, quartile 4.


Daytime Sleepiness

Daytime sleepiness, as measured by an increased ESS score, was significantly correlated with nocturnal choking (R = 0.34; P<.001), observed sleep apnea (R = 0.33; P<.001), habitual snoring (R = 0.27; P<.001), poor sleep quality (R = 0.27; P<.001), BMI (R = 0.20; P<.001), and age (R = 0.15; P<.01). All had significant independent effects on the variance of the ESS score. These significant independent factors were found to account for a little more than 20% of the variance in ESS score (R2 = 0.21). Sex, anthropometric measurements (including waist circumference and waist-hip ratio), and biochemical markers of the metabolic syndrome (plasma glucose level, plasma insulin level, and lipid profile) did not show predictive value. These findings indicate a clear relation between daytime sleepiness and obesity in general but not to central obesity.

Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (R = 0.32; P<.001) and waist circumference (R = 0.33; P<.001) are independent significant predictors of reported OSA.

Significant Sleep Disturbance

By combining the groups with symptoms of habitual snoring and any 1 or more of observed sleep apnea, daytime sleepiness (ESS score of >10), and poor sleep quality, a group with significant sleep disturbance was defined and included 59% (36/61) of the male and 45% (113/252) of the female patients overall. This definition provides us with an indication for further evaluation by sleep study. As was found for OSA, there were many predictors of significant sleep disturbance, including male sex, high BMI, and the anthropometric measures. The best single predictor was waist circumference (R = 0.37; P<.001) and, when corrected for this, no other measurement added significantly to the variance of significant sleep disturbance. Sixty-two percent (67/108) of patients with a waist circumference of 126 cm or greater (median) reported significant sleep disturbance, with only 28% (29/102) of patients with a smaller waist circumference reporting such a disturbance.

SURGICAL RESULTS

Laparoscopic placement of the adjustable gastric band was achieved in 300 patients. In only 1 was conversion to an open approach necessary, due to the presence of a massive liver preventing adequate access. The remaining 12 patients underwent elective open placement of the band, as all were undergoing revision after previous gastric restrictive surgery (gastroplasty in 10 and nonadjustable banding in 2). The median hospital stay for laparoscopic placement is 2 days.

Weight loss is progressive during the first 2 to 3 years, with a plateau out to 6 years. The results of all 740 persons treated with this method by one of us (P.E.O.) are shown in Figure 2. Early complications in our study group of 313 were 4 wound infections (1 [0.3%] of 300 after laparoscopic surgery and 3 [23%] of 13 after open surgery). There was no clinical evidence of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolus in this series. There were no patients requiring postoperative respiratory support. The most significant late postoperative problem is prolapse of the stomach through the band. This occurred in 29 (9%) of these patients, and presents with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux and band stomal obstruction; opening the band stoma relieves symptoms, and laparoscopic surgical revision is required. The incidence of prolapse is decreasing, probably as a result of better fixation of the band to the stomach. There were 4 (1%) erosions of the band into the stomach and 4 (1%) cases of tubing leaks, requiring surgical correction.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Body mass index (BMI) (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) after surgery with an adjustable gastric banding system (Lap-Band) (N = 740, consecutive series).


SLEEP AFTER WEIGHT LOSS

One-year follow-up data are available for 123 of the 313 patients, and these patients have completed a follow-up clinical review and questionnaire. This group had a mean initial weight of 129.7 ± 24.0 kg and an initial BMI of 46.0 ± 7.5. At 1-year follow-up, the mean weight was 98.5 ± 18.0 kg and the BMI was 35.3 ± 5.8. This represents a mean weight loss of 31.2 ± 13.0 kg and a percentage excess weight loss of 48% ± 16% at 12 months. The preoperative and follow-up data for sleep disturbance are shown in Table 3. Highly significant improvement is seen for all measures of sleep disturbance. Table 4 shows the change in the ESS score and indicates a marked improvement in daytime sleepiness for men and women. The mean ESS score at 12-month follow-up of 4.0 ± 3.4 is identical with the community norm.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 3. Paired Responses to Sleep Questionnaire of 123 Consecutive Patients Returning for Review 12 Months After Surgery*



View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 4. Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Scores Preoperatively and at the 12-Month Follow-up*


Of the 123 patients followed up, 10 were using nasal continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of OSA preoperatively. At follow-up, 7 were no longer using this therapy and symptoms had resolved. The remaining 3 reported sleep improvement with weight loss but still used continuous positive airway pressure therapy. One is awaiting upper airway surgery. This small group had an ESS score of of 13.1 preoperatively and 2.75 at follow-up (P<.001).


COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Patients and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

This study confirms that sleep disturbance is a common comorbidity of obesity in men and women. The measured prevalence of habitual snoring, observed sleep apnea, and nocturnal choking of 52% of men and 26% of women is likely to be an underestimate, as many patients have not been observed during sleep. In addition, there may be differing reporting characteristics of men and women partners, with men perhaps less likely to report observed sleep apnea in a female partner.

Men on presentation to us are more likely to have had documentation of sleep disturbance by an overnight sleep study. Only 15% of women presenting with morbid obesity, habitual snoring, and excessive daytime sleepiness had been investigated, compared with 46% of men. This may indicate a belief that SDB predominantly affects men and, therefore, symptoms of sleep disturbance may not be elicited or recognized in women. Janson et al,8 studying sleep disturbance in young adults, found that young men were more likely to report habitual snoring and women more often reported daytime sleepiness. Our data indicate that obese women with sleep disturbance who present for weight loss surgery are underinvestigated.

There is clearly significant correlation between weight, BMI, and waist, hip, and neck measurements. Measurements that correlated best with obesity-related sleep disturbance were BMI and waist measurements, with neck measurements of less predictive value. Deegan and McNicholas18 found that waist measurement was a better predictor of the apnea-hypopnea index than was neck measurement in men, with the opposite being true in women. We found waist circumference a better predictor of reported sleep disturbance than neck circumference in men and women. For a waist measurement of greater than 126 cm in men or women, there is a high prevalence of sleep disturbance and this simple test is easily performed in any physician's office.

Obstructive sleep apnea in morbidly obese subjects has clear associations with male sex, increased waist circumference, and high waist-hip ratio—the android weight distribution. In contrast to this, we found that neither sex nor weight distribution nor the biochemical markers of the metabolic syndrome affect daytime sleepiness, after adjusting for BMI and age. It would appear that daytime sleepiness is a common feature of morbid obesity and, unlike OSA, is not related to weight distribution. This finding concurs with that of Vgontzas et al,6 who found that daytime sleepiness in obese patients is not always associated with SDB and may be related to other factors such as metabolic or circadian abnormalities. Daytime sleepiness can be a major disability with obvious effects on patients' work, leisure, and safety. This study has found major improvement in daytime sleepiness associated with weight loss in men and women, with complete resolution of this important comorbidity in most of our patients.

Weight loss using the adjustable gastric banding system dramatically improves and often abolishes symptoms of SDB in morbidly obese patients. Symptoms directly due to upper airway obstruction, habitual snoring, observed OSA, and nocturnal choking are all improved. Asthma and gastroesophageal reflux are also improved after placement of the adjustable gastric band and subsequent weight loss.19, 20 In addition to improving SDB, nasal continuous positive airway pressure also improves asthma and gastroesophageal reflux, both common comorbidities of obesity and often aggravated by OSA.7, 21 There are likely to be multiple mechanisms for the improvement in upper and lower airway obstruction with weight loss.

While the exact nature and spectrum of obesity-related sleep disorder might be debated, it is clear that patient-reported sleep disturbance and daytime sleepiness improve substantially with weight loss. There are many studies11, 12, 13, 14 showing that weight loss using dietary and surgical methods improves sleep disorders in obese subjects. The primary aim of management of obesity-related sleep disorder, including SDB in obese patients, should be sustainable weight loss. Surgery is the only available method to achieve this effect in severely obese subjects. Recent advances in weight loss surgery, particularly the use of the laparoscopic or minimally invasive approach and the ability to adjust the degree of gastric restriction, provide a safe, effective, and acceptable way to treat selected cases of obesity-related sleep disorder.22, 23 Obesity surgery should be considered as one of the management options of SDB and excessive daytime sleepiness, both significant public health issues.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Patients and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Accepted for publication August 3, 2000.

This study was supported by BioEnterics Corporation, Carpinteria, Calif.

The Department of Surgery at Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, is conducting clinical studies on "The clinical evaluation of the Lap-Band: an adjustable gastric banding system used in morbidly obese patients." These studies are part of an international multicenter retrospective and prospective evaluation of the Lap-Band.

From the Department of Surgery, Monash University–Alfred Hospital (Drs Dixon and O'Brien), and the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Austin and Repatriation Medical Center (Dr Schachter), Melbourne, Australia.

Corresponding author: John B. Dixon, MBBS, FRACGP, Department of Surgery, Monash University–Alfred Hospital, Melbourne 3181, Victoria, Australia (e-mail: john.dixon{at}med.monash.edu.au).


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Patients and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

1. Kyzer S, Charuzi I. Obstructive sleep apnea in the obese. World J Surg. 1998;22:998-1001. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
2. Grunstein RR, Stenlof K, Hedner JA, Sjostrom L. Impact of self-reported sleep-breathing disturbances on psychosocial performance in the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) Study. Sleep. 1995;18:635-643. ISI | PUBMED
3. Findley LJ, Barth JT, Powers DC, Wilhoit SC, Boyd DG, Suratt PM. Cognitive impairment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and associated hypoxemia. Chest. 1986;90:686-690. FREE FULL TEXT
4. Findley LJ, Unverzagt ME, Suratt PM. Automobile accidents involving patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988;138:337-340. ISI | PUBMED
5. Vgontzas A, Tan T, Bixler E, et al. Sleep apnea and sleep disruption in obese patients. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1705-1711. FREE FULL TEXT
6. Vgontzas A, Bixler E, Tan J, et al. Obesity without sleep apnea is associated with daytime sleepiness. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1333-1337. FREE FULL TEXT
7. Chan CS, Woolcock AJ, Sullivan CE. Nocturnal asthma: role of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988;137:1502-1504. ISI | PUBMED
8. Janson C, Gislason T, De Backer W, et al. Daytime sleepiness, snoring and gastro-oesophageal reflux amongst young adults in three European countries. J Intern Med. 1995;237:277-285. ISI | PUBMED
9. Katz D, McHorney C. Clinical correlates of insomnia in patients with chronic illness. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1099-1107. FREE FULL TEXT
10. Bulpitt C, Palmer A, Battersby C, Fletcher A. Association of symptoms of type 2 diabetic patients with severity of disease, obesity, and blood pressure. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:111-115. ABSTRACT
11. Kansanen M, Vanninen E, Tuunainen A, et al. The effect of a very low-calorie diet-induced weight loss on the severity of obstructive sleep apnea and autonomic nervous function in obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Clin Physiol. 1998;18:377-385. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
12. Pasquali R, Colella P, Cirignotta F, et al. Treatment of obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS): effect of weight loss and interference of otorhinolaryngoiatric pathology. Int J Obes. 1990;14:207-217. ISI | PUBMED
13. Sugerman H, Fairman P, Sood R, et al. Long term effects of gastric surgery for treating respiratory insufficency of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;55(suppl):597S-601S.
14. Charuzi I, Lavie P, Peiser J, Peled R. Bariatric surgery in morbid obesity sleep-apnea patients: short- and long-term follow-up. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;55(suppl):594S-596S.
15. Johns M. A new method of measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep. 1991;14:540-545. ISI | PUBMED
16. Johns M. Reliability and factor analysis of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep. 1992;15:376-381. ISI | PUBMED
17. SPSS for Windows 9.0.1. Chicago, Ill: SPSS Inc; 1999.
18. Deegan P, McNicholas W. Predictive value of clinical features for the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Eur Respir J. 1996;9:117-124. ABSTRACT
19. Dixon JB, Chapman L, O'Brien P. Marked improvement in asthma after Lap-Band surgery for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 1999;9:385-389. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
20. Dixon JB, O'Brien PE. Gastroesophageal reflux in obesity: the effect of Lap-Band placement. Obes Surg. 1999;9:527-531. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
21. Kerr P, Shoenut J, Steens R, et al. Nasal continuous airways pressure: a new treatment for nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1993;17:276-280. ISI | PUBMED
22. Carmichael A. Treatment of morbid obesity. Postgrad Med J. 1999;75:7-12. FREE FULL TEXT
23. O'Brien P, Brown W, Smith A, McMurrick P, Stephens M. Prospective study of a laparoscopically placed, adjustable gastric band in the treatment of morbid obesity. Br J Surg. 1999;86:113-118. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Progression and Regression of Sleep-Disordered Breathing With Changes in Weight: The Sleep Heart Health Study
Newman et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:2408-2413.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Primary Care Perspective on Bariatric Surgery
Presutti et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:1158-1166.
ABSTRACT  

Depression in Association With Severe Obesity: Changes With Weight Loss
Dixon et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2058-2065.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predicting Sleep Apnea and Excessive Day Sleepiness in the Severely Obese: Indicators for Polysomnography
Dixon et al.
Chest 2003;123:1134-1141.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding in the Treatment of Morbid Obesity
O'Brien and Dixon
Arch Surg 2003;138:376-382.
FULL TEXT  

Health Outcomes of Severely Obese Type 2 Diabetic Subjects 1 Year After Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding
Dixon and O'Brien
Diabetes Care 2002;25:358-363.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.