This Article  • PDF of this Correction  • Original article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:300.

In the Commentary by Grossman and Messerli titled "Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers: Equal or Preferred Substitutes for ACE Inhibitors?" published in the July 10 issue of the ARCHIVES (2000;160:1905-1911), an error occurred in the text on page 1906, third column, the sixth and seventh lines. It should have read "response (as defined in the respective study) was more than 60%" rather than "response (as defined in the retrospective study) was more than 60%."