 |
|
A Review of the Evidence for the Use of Phytoestrogens as a Replacement for Traditional Estrogen Replacement Therapy
M. Gina Glazier, MB, BCh;
Marjorie A. Bowman, MD, MPA
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1161-1172.
ABSTRACT
| |
Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) is recommended for postmenopausal
women primarily for reduction of menopausal symptoms and prevention of osteoporosis
and cardiovascular disease. However, only 35% to 40% of women ever start ERT,
and many do not continue it. One of the reasons women are reluctant to receive
postmenopausal ERT is that they perceive prescription estrogens as being "unnatural."
Because of this, there is increasing interest in the use of plant-derived
estrogens, also known as phytoestrogens. This article reviews the evidence
for the potential of phytoestrogens, either in dietary or supplemental form,
to replace traditional forms of ERT. A comprehensive search of the English-language
literature identified more than 1000 articles published in the past 30 years
about phytoestrogens. In total, 74 studies were selected for inclusion in
this review based on relevance, inclusion of human subjects wherever possible,
and study design. The studies examine phytoestrogens' inhibition of the growth
of cancer cell lines in vitro and in animals. They also look at the role of
phytoestrogens in the reduction of cholesterol levels, and the use of one
phytoestrogen derivative, ipriflavone, in the prevention of osteoporosis.
Some small studies examine the role of phytoestrogens in the prevention of
menopausal symptoms. Evidence for the potential health benefits of phytoestrogens
is increasing. However, the clinically proven health benefits of prescribed
ERT far outweigh those of phytoestrogens. Therefore, there is insufficient
evidence to recommend the use of phytoestrogens in place of traditional ERT,
or to make recommendations to women about specific phytoestrogen products.
INTRODUCTION
Postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) has been used for
more than 25 years and combined estrogen-progesterone therapy has been widely
used for at least the last 15 years. In this article, ERT will be used to
refer to both estrogen and combined estrogen-progesterone replacement therapy.
Current knowledge of ERT comes from large observational studies, cohort studies,
and randomized controlled trials. Results of these studies show that, if used
for primary prevention, ERT is associated with reduced mortality from cardiovascular
disease by about 35%,1-2 reduces
osteoporosis risk by about 50%;3 and reduces
menopausal symptoms.4 Smaller studies suggest
that ERT may also improve or reduce the incidence of such diverse medical
conditions as memory loss,5 Alzheimer disease,6 tooth loss,7 and colon
cancer.8 This list is not exhaustive and continues
to expand as further studies are performed. Disadvantages of ERT include a
potential increase in the risk of breast cancer (relative risk seems to be
about 1.3 after at least 8 years of ERT9) and
an increase in vaginal bleeding.10 There is
an increased risk of endometrial cancer if women with an intact uterus take
unopposed estrogen therapy. However, this risk is negated by the use of combined
estrogen-progesterone therapy.11
The potential public health effect of ERT is reduced because only about
35% to 40% of menopausal women ever begin ERT and only about 15% continue
taking it long-term.12 There are numerous reasons
for this low uptake including physician failure to endorse and patient factors
such as fear of breast cancer, dislike of the adverse effect of vaginal bleeding,
and the concept of interfering with a "natural" process.13-14
There has been a rapid increase in consumer interest in the use of alternative
medicines, particularly in the use of supplements and herbs for the treatment
of menopausal symptoms.15 It is reported that
70% of the patients who use complementary therapy do not reveal this to their
"traditional" primary care physician because they either do not consider it
a medicine or fear primary care physician disapproval.15
When deciding to take complementary therapies, patients frequently base their
decisions on anecdotal reports of success in the lay literature more than
information from scientific experiments. Many women who are unwilling to take
traditional ERT see herbal therapies as natural and, therefore, preferable
to "unnatural" prescription medication, despite the fact that traditional
ERT is often derived from natural sources such as mare's urine. Herbal and
plant-derived therapies are frequently considered safer, although there are
no government standards controlling their quality.16
While herbal supplements may be effective, they may also be dangerous, mixed
with contaminants, or have unknown or adverse effects.17
Alternative medicines that are used for menopause include phytoestrogens,
herbs, and nutritional supplements. Herbs traditionally recommended for menopausal
symptoms include black and blue cohosh, evening primrose oil, chasteberry,
and licorice. Vitamin E is a commonly recommended dietary supplement. A recent
review article on these herbs and supplements reveals that the scientific
evidence is scant regarding their safety and efficacy.18
Few randomized controlled trials have been done investigating their use and
these trials show that none have proved better than placebo.19-22
Phytoestrogens are naturally occurring plant estrogens that have a chemical
structure similar to human estrogen and that have the proven ability to attach
to estrogen receptors in humans. Interest in these phytoestrogens (referred
to in the lay literature as "natural estrogens" or "plant estrogens") as an
alternative treatment for menopause recently has increased. Increasing the
intake of dietary phytoestrogens is thought to decrease the risk of cancer
and cardiovascular disease. Concentrated phytoestrogens are available in pill
form and are sold extensively in health food stores and on the Internet. Web
sites attest to the fact that these supplements are natural, identical to
human hormones, and as effective as prescription ERT. It is claimed that these
supplements can lower cholesterol levels, reduce menopausal symptoms, decrease
the risk of endometrial cancer, improve sexual enjoyment, and reduce the risk
of osteoporosis.
This review summarizes the available published experimental data about
the possible benefits and adverse effects of phytoestrogens to see if there
are sufficient data to substantiate these claims. We compare this evidence
with the known benefits and adverse effects of prescribed ERT. Based on the
available scientific data, is there evidence that phytoestrogens could replace
traditional ERT?
METHODS
The MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases from January 1, 1966, through
September 30, 1999, were searched for articles using the terms "phytoestrogen,"
"isoflavones," "coumestans," "lignans," and "soy," and cross-referenced with
the terms "cholesterol," "hyperlipidemia," "endometrial cancer," "breast cancer,"
"osteoporosis," "hot flashes," "coronary heart disease," "menopause," and
"prevention." The reference lists of published articles were searched for
relevant English-language articles about phytoestrogens that were not found
on the database searches. Lay literature concerning phytoestrogens was obtained
through Internet searches, and directly from the companies who supply plant-derived
estrogens in pill form.
Criteria for the selection of articles included English language and
human subjects wherever available. As far as possible, we endeavored to consider
only evidence from randomized, blinded, controlled studies in preference to
observational or epidemiological studies. Animal studies were included to
support human data or if there were no relevant human studies available. In
vitro studies were used to support animal or human data, or if there were
no in vivo data available. As the interest in phytoestrogens has increased,
the number of studies has also increased. Where important, the weakness in
the trials and experiments cited are noted. Using these criteria, a total
of 74 articles were considered relevant.
WHAT ARE PHYTOESTROGENS?
Phytoestrogens are a diverse group of nonsteroidal plant compounds that
can behave as estrogens and occur naturally in most plants, fruits, and vegetables.23 They were first noted in 1926 to have estrogenic
activity.24 Because they possess a phenolic
ring, this enables them to bind to estrogen receptors in humans. They bind
to both types of estrogen receptor, Er receptors and the more recently
discovered Erß receptors.25 Many phytoestrogens
seem to have a higher affinity for the Erß receptor than steroidal estrogens,
which suggests that they may exert their actions through distinctly different
pathways.25 However, despite their ability
to bind to the estrogen receptor, they are much weaker than human estrogens,
with 102 to 105 times less activity.26
They seem to possess both estrogenic and antiestrogenic behavior, but whether
they act primarily as an estrogen or as an antiestrogen seeems to depend on
an individual's amount of circulating endogenous estrogens and the number
and type of estrogen receptors.27-28
Even though they have low estrogenic activity, they are frequently present
in the body in much higher quantities than endogenously produced estrogens.29 Some have also demonstrated progesterone receptor
activity.30
There are 3 main types of phytoestrogens—the isoflavones (the
most potent), coumestans, and lignans (Figure
1). There are more than 1000 types of isoflavones, but the most
commonly investigated are genistein and daidzein, which are also thought to
have the highest estrogenic properties. They are found in legumes such as
soy, chickpeas, clover, lentils, and beans.26
The amount of phytoestrogen found in each soy protein depends on the processing
techniques used and its relative abundance in the specific soy product of
interest. The secondary soy products (milk or flour) contain lower amounts
of isoflavones than the primary products.30
The isoflavones are bound to glucose, and when ingested by humans, are enzymatically
cleaved in the gut to the active forms.25 The
metabolism of the phytoestrogens varies from person to person, and there is
also a sex difference, with women appearing to metabolize them more efficiently.31 The estrogenic activity of the various isoflavones
varies greatly. We do not yet know which is the most biologically active form.
|
|
|
|
Classification of phytoestrogens.
|
|
|
The lignans (enterolactone or enterodiol) are found in flaxseed (in
huge quantities), lentils, whole grains, beans, fruits, and vegetables.26 Other classes, which are much more rarely ingested,
are the coumestans (found in sprouting plants), flavones, flavanones, chalcones,
terpenoids, and saponins.
POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF PHYTOESTROGENS
Rates of certain diseases, particularly cancers, vary greatly between
various geographic regions. In epidemiological observational studies, it was
noted that the rates of colon, prostate, and breast cancers were much lower
in Japan and other southeast Asian societies than in the United States.32-33 Similar differences were also noted
for cardiovascular diseases.34 Interest in
the phytoestrogens as therapy for menopausal symptoms began when it was noted
that Asian women had approximately 10% the incidence of hot flashes that American
women had, but this may be complicated by cultural definitions and beliefs.35-36 These are observational studies with
many confounding factors including genetics, psychology, and diet. However,
migration studies of Japanese moving to the United States showed the Japanese
developed an increased incidence of "Western" disease within 1 or 2 generations.37 Therefore, genetics do not seem to be the only factor
and attention has turned to diet. In comparing the Asian diet with that consumed
in the West, one of the most significant differences is the high quantity
of soy in the Asian diet. The average diet resulted in the ingestion of between
20 and 150 mg/d of soy compared with women in the United States who ingest
1 to 3 mg/d.38
Soy contains high levels of phytoestrogens, particularly the isoflavones.
As a result of these observational studies, isoflavones, and particularly
soy, are marketed as food supplements and drinks, and also as nonprescription-requiring
natural hormone replacement therapy. Is it possible that by supplementing
the diet with phytoestrogens that we can improve disease profiles? The evidence
is discussed below.
CANCER PREVENTION
Phytoestrogens have several potential anticarcinogenic activities. Early
studies focused on their estrogenic activity, particularly in their potential
ability to reduce the risk of breast cancer, but recent studies have found
that their actions are not purely estrogenic, and their nonhormonal activities
could be more important in cancer prevention.39
The proposed mechanisms by which they may inhibit cancer cells include the
following: (1) inhibition of DNA topoisomerase, (2) suppression of angiogenesis,
(3) induction of differentiation in cancer cell lines, and (4) induction of
apoptosis.40 Numerous in vitro cell culture
studies and in vivo animal experiments have demonstrated that phytoestrogens
can inhibit tumors.32 In a comprehensive review
on the potential of phytoestrogens to reduce tumor growth, Fournier et al41 noted that 16 of 17 animal studies showed that the
addition of soy products reduced tumor incidence or multiplicity in tumor
models of the breast, prostate, liver, esophagus, and lung. Isoflavones were
the most common soy constituent added (11 studies), but various other components
of soy (genistein, soybean saponin, and soy flour) were also used.
Many studies have focused on the isoflavone, genistein, which seems
to be the primary anticancer soy constituent. It has antioxidant properties
that may also play a role in its anticarcinogenic effects. It can inhibit
hydrogen peroxide–induced tumor promoter activity in vitro and in vivo42 and has been shown to inhibit tyrosine kinase.43 Its activity as an anticancer agent probably results
from its suppression of enzymes that promote cell growth.
Caution in the interpretation of the available evidence is necessary.
Many, but not all, of the tumor-inhibiting effects have been obtained with
huge doses of the phytoestrogens, far larger than could be obtained by diet
alone. Experimental conditions and isoflavone concentrations varied widely.
Cell lines were different and the presence or absence of estradiol also varied.
We have no idea what doses and what types of phytoestrogens should be used
for tumor suppression, their duration of use, their frequency of use, and
the potential or real adverse effects or toxicities. To date, there are no
intervention trials using soy or its products in humans for primary or secondary
prevention of cancer. These studies are needed, but will be difficult to perform
and control. In addition, it is difficult to conduct retrospective epidemiological
studies on soy intake. Assessments of the amount and types of soy products
consumed 3 or 4 decades prior to the study are unreliable, as is the ability
to link this information to the development of cancer years later.
No recommendations can be made regarding phytoestrogens' use in cancer
prevention or treatment other than the fact that they seem to have encouraging
effects in vitro. Based on this evidence, no conclusive statement can be made
about the protective effect of dietary phytoestrogens other than most in vitro
and animal studies suggest that the soy constituents, particularly the isoflavones,
have antineoplastic activity.
BREAST CANCER
One of the reasons women are reluctant to take traditional ERT is the
fear of developing breast cancer. Recent studies have suggested that the risk
of breast cancer in patients receiving ERT increases with the duration of
therapy. The magnitude of this association remains controversial, but relative
risks are in the range of 1.3 to 2.4 after a minimum of 5 years of therapy.9
Phytoestrogens have structural similarity to estrogens, and it is, therefore,
theoretically possible that ingestion could also increase the risk of breast
cancer. However, epidemiological studies suggest that phytoestrogen consumption
is inversely associated with the development of breast cancer. Countries in
which the dietary intake of phytoestrogens is high have some of the world's
lowest incidences of breast cancer.44 These
are observational studies only.
Studies on breast cancer and phytoestrogens are summarized in Table 1. Early studies looking at the associations
of phytoestrogens, particularly genestein, with breast cancer looked at its
action on hormone receptors. In one study 48 women who were about to undergo
resection of breast masses were given either a daily supplement of isoflavones
(45 mg/d) or a placebo for 2 weeks prior to the surgery. The isoflavone-supplemented
group had increased growth in the breast lobular epithelium and increased
progesterone-receptor expression.45 The significance
of this is unknown.
|
|
|
|
Table 1. Summary of Phytoestrogens and Breast Cancer Prevention
|
|
|
We know that phytoestrogens can bind to estrogen receptors in vitro,
and, like tamoxifen, they have both mild estrogenic and antiestrogenic effects.
Therefore, if their antiestrogenic activity is prominent, they could, in theory,
reduce the potential carcinogenic effect of prolonged estrogenic activity.46 Zava and Duwe46 compared
the dose-response to genestein with that of estradiol, tamoxifen, and several
other structurally similar iso- and bioflavonoids (equol, kaempferol, and
quercetin) in human breast cancer cells in vitro. The results showed that
genistein was the only isoflavonoid with potent estrogen agonist and cell
growth inhibitory actions over a physiologically obtainable concentration
range. The growth-inhibitory action of genestein was distinctly different
from those of tamoxifen.46
However, an experiment done in ovariectomized mice found that genestein
actually stimulated mammary cancer growth.47
The postulated theory was that phytoestrogens, acting as weak estrogens, exhibit
estrogenic activity in a low-estrogen environment. These animals, although
ovariectomized, were sexually immature. A study by Wang et al48
investigated the effects of increasing genestein concentrations on estrogen
receptor–positive human breast cancer cells. Genistein produced a concentration-dependent
effect on their growth. At levels similar to those produced by soy in the
diet, DNA synthesis in breast cancer cell lines appeared to be stimulated,48 but at higher concentrations, genistein inhibited
growth. The effects of genistein on growth at lower concentrations appeared
to be via the estrogen receptor pathway, while the effects at higher concentrations
were independent of the estrogen receptor. It seems as if phytoestrogens could
act at other levels in the cell and have the potential, in low concentrations,
of inducing breast cancer.
Despite some evidence that genestein has the potential to be a cancer
promoter, most in vivo and in vitro studies show that genestein inhibits the
growth of breast cancer cells and induces apoptosis in breast cancer cell
lines.49-50 In one study,51 newborn female rats fed a known mammary carcinogen
were randomized to receive supplementary genestein, and there was a 50% reduction
in the number of breast cancers in the genestein-exposed group. The timing
of genestein administration seemed to be critical in reducing the incidence
of breast cancer. Mice fed genestein prior to 35 days of age had a greatly
reduced incidence of breast tumors compared with those exposed later in life.52 Despite encouraging study results in animals, experimental
human studies have yet to be performed.
Although there are no experimental human studies, some case-control
studies have attempted to link soy intake and breast cancer risk. Most recently,
a case-control study of 288 subjects by Ingram et al53
looked at the association between the urinary excretion of phytoestrogens
and breast cancer. Patients were women 30 to 84 years old recently diagnosed
as having breast cancer; controls were matched for demographic variables.
They found that the increased urinary excretion of some phytoestrogens was
associated with a substantial decrease in the risk of breast cancer (odds
ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.69).53
The amount absorbed is more important than the amount ingested. A study from
China of 60 patients with breast cancer showed similar findings, where the
median excretion of isoflavones in the patients was 50% to 65% less than in
the control subjects.54 A criticism of these
studies is the lack of information on a temporal relationship between soy
intake and breast cancer development. We do not know if the patients ate diets
high in soy before they were diagnosed as having cancer, or whether they had
changed their diets over time.
The conflicting results make it difficult to interpret the studies—do
phytoestrogens prevent or promote breast cancer growth? It is possible that
they demonstrate estrogenic activity in a low-estrogen environment and antiestrogenic
activity in a high-estrogen environment. It is, therefore, possible that they
have the potential to protect against breast cancer before menopause (high-estrogen
environment) and be procancer agents after menopause (low-estrogen environment).
This theory is partly supported by a study from Singapore that showed an inverse
relationship between soy intake and breast cancer in premenopausal women but
not in postmenopausal women.55 Again, caution
in the interpretation of the evidence is necessary. Most of the studies have
been conducted in vitro and, owing to conflicting evidence, further research
is needed to confirm the action of phytoestrogens. The real worry is that
phytoestrogens seem to have the ability to actually promote some breast tumor
growth. Further in vitro studies are needed to sort out the conflicting data
and, following this, well-designed intervention studies should be performed
to confirm whether phytoestrogens can in fact reduce the risk of breast cancer.
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE
The incidence of cardiovascular disease increases steeply in women after
menopause. Studies have shown that traditional ERT lowers the total serum
cholesterol level and increases the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)
level. If used for primary prevention, it is associated with a 35% to 40%
decrease in cardiovascular disease mortality.1, 56
These epidemiological data are supported both by clinical trials and basic
science research.2 The "healthy-user" effect
has been hypothesized to affect these correlations, but so far, there is no
definitive evidence to disprove these large studies.
Because the incidence of cardiovascular disease is lower in countries
in which large quantities of soy are consumed in the diet, phytoestrogens,
particularly soy, have been investigated as cholesterol-lowering agents since
the early 1940s.2, 57 Trials of
phytoestrogens in cardiovascular disease prevention are outlined in Table 2. In a large epidemiological study
on the relationship between soy product intake and total serum cholesterol
concentration, 4838 Japanese men and women had their serum cholesterol levels
measured and were interviewed regarding their dietary intake of soy and soy
products.58 A significant trend (P<.001) was observed for decreasing total serum cholesterol concentration
with an increasing intake of soy products in both men and women suggesting
a dose-response relationship. However, it is also possible that persons who
use soy as a protein source may have a lower intake of animal proteins and,
therefore, a concomitant reduction in cholesterol and saturated fat intake.
|
|
|
|
Table 2. Summary of Phytoestrogen Supplementation and Cardiovascular
Risk Reduction*
|
|
|
There are several mechanisms by which dietary phytoestrogens could prevent
or reduce atherosclerosis including antioxidant activity,59
improvement in plasma lipid concentrations,60-61
reduction of thrombus formation,62 and improvement
in vascular compliance.63 The mechanisms by
which they could improve plasma lipid profiles are poorly understood. Proposed
mechanisms of action include the following: increased bile acid secretion,60 direct action on estrogen receptors,64
inhibition of endogenous cholesterol synthesis,65
up-regulation of the cholesterol receptors,66
and enhanced thyroid function (an elevated thyroxine level reduces the cholesterol
level).67-68 Studies investigating
the potential cardioprotective effects of phytoestrogens have been done on
both primate and human subjects. In 1996, Anthony et al69
studied 27 peripubertal male and female rhesus monkeys fed moderately atherogenic
diets with soy protein as the protein source. In a crossover design, the monkeys
were fed a phytoestrogen-depleted soy protein for 6 months and a phytoestrogen-containing
soy protein for 6 months. The phytoestrogen diet significantly decreased the
low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and very low-density lipoprotein
cholesterol levels in both male and female monkeys by 30% to 40% and increased
the HDL-C level by 15% in females. In addition, the total serum cholesterol
level–HDL-C ratio decreased by 20% in the male monkeys and 50% in the
female monkeys. A similar study was conducted in 1997 on ovariectomized female
monkeys fed 1 of the following 4 diets: animal protein (casein) alone, animal
protein with 17ß-estradiol, soy isolate alone (which contained soy phytoestrogens),
or soy isolate with 17ß-estradiol.70 Soy
protein improved the plasma lipid profiles, and soy protein combined with
estradiol improved the lipid profiles even further. In one further study by
Anthony et al71 young male cynomolgous monkeys
were fed 1 of the following 3 diets for 14 months: animal protein, phytoestrogen-depleted
soy, or phytoestrogen-containing soy. Again, those fed phytoestrogen-containing
soy had improved lipid profiles compared with the other 2 groups. In addition,
autopsy studies done on a random sample of each group showed that the group
fed phytoestrogens had 90% less atherosclerosis than those fed animal protein.
There are numerous small sample size studies on human looking at the
potential cardiovascular benefits of phytoestrogens. In an attempt to combine
these, Anderson et al72 performed a meta-analysis
of 38 controlled trials of soy protein use for cholesterol reduction in humans.
Thirty-four of 38 studies showed an improvement in lipid values. Overall,
an average of 47 g of soy protein intake per day resulted in statistically
significant reductions of 9.3% in the total serum cholesterol level, 12.9%
in LDL level, and 10.5% in triglyceride levels. There was no overall change
noted in HDL-C or very low-density lipoprotein levels. In addition, the higher
the patient's initial total serum cholesterol level, the better their response
to soy intake. Those with normal cholesterol levels with initial cholesterol
values below 5.2 mmol/L (<200 mg/dL) had nonsignificant decreases of 4.4%,
whereas subjects with initial values above 8.66 mmol/L (>335 mg/dL) had significant
reductions of 19.6%. There was insufficient data to analyze the effects based
on sex.
Since 1995, further small human studies have been conducted. Washburn
et al73 carried out a randomized, double-blind,
crossover trial in 51 perimenopausal women. Subjects received the following
3 diets in sequence, each given for 6 weeks: a comparison carbohydrate-based
diet; a diet with 34 mg of supplemental phytoestrogens in a single dose; and
a diet with 34 mg of phytoestrogens split in 2 doses. Significant declines
in total serum cholesterol (6%) and LDL-C (7%) levels were noted in the 2
groups receiving the soy diets as compared with the group receiving the carbohydrate
diet. A significant decrease of 5 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure was also
noted in the subjects receiving twice daily soy supplements compared with
the carbohydrate only diet. To establish whether soy protein lowered the total
cholesterol level in normocholesterolemic subjects on a National Cholesterol
Education Panel Step I diet, Wong et al74 conducted
a randomized crossover study. Thirteen normocholesterolemic and 13 hypercholesterolemic
men aged between 20 and 50 years were fed either an National Cholesterol Education
Panel Step I soy protein diet or an National Cholesterol Education Panel Step
I animal protein diet for 5 weeks, followed by a washout period of 10 to 15
weeks, and then the alternate diet for 5 weeks. The hypocholesterolemic effect
of soy protein was found to be independent of age and body weight. Regardless
of original lipid status, the soy protein diet was associated with a statistically
significant decrease in the plasma concentrations of LDL-C (P = .03) and the ratio of plasma LDL-C to HDL-C (P = .005).
Following from the primate studies, interest has centered on finding
the component of soy that is most responsible for its cholesterol-lowering
ability, primarily the isoflavones—genestein and daidzein. In 15 healthy
young women with normal cholesterol levels, it was found that 45 mg/d of isoflavonoids,
but not 23 mg/d, resulted in a significant decrease in total serum cholestrol
and LDL-C levels.61 In a noncontrolled trial
Nestel et al63 studied 15 perimenopausal and
postmenopausal women fed 45 mg/d of genestein over 10 weeks. Although there
was no significant change in LDL-C levels after treatment, arterial compliance
improved by 26%, a similar degree to that encountered in women who receive
conventional ERT. Not all trials have shown an improvement in lipid profiles.
Hodgson et al75 looked at 46 men and 13 postmenopausal
women who were given 55 mg/d of isoflavonoids (mainly genestein) in pill form
over 8 weeks in a 2-way parallel design. There was no difference noted in
baseline and posttreatment cholesterol levels and it was concluded in this
study that patients with normal cholesterol levels at baseline do not have
a significant improvement when fed isoflavonoids.
Variability in study design (particularly the type and amount of phytoestrogen
used); study subjects (age and sex varies greatly); and outcomes studied make
the studies done on cholesterol lowering associated with phytoestrogens hard
to synthesize. The numbers of subjects studied are generally small (usually
<100, often <30). It seems as if the beneficial effects are greater
in those with elevated, rather than normal, cholesterol levels. Overall, phytoestrogen
supplementation seems to have a beneficial effect on lipid values, but the
magnitude of that effect, its clinical significance, and the amount of soy
isoflavones required to obtain it are still in question. Despite the inconsistencies,
there are no studies to date showing an elevation of lipid values with the
use of these diets.
Is there other evidence for improvement in cardiovascular disease? Although
soy protein may reduce the lipid values, there are no studies to date studying
the long-term effects of soy in coronary heart disease prevention. There is
strong epidemiological evidence that the risk of heart disease in Asian countries
is significantly lower than the United States, but this is confounded by the
fact that the Asian diet also has low saturated fat.76
There is only one primate study that shows that a diet high in soy reduced
atherosclerosis, which could affect the rate of heart disease.77
There is also interest in the platelet inhibitory function of genestein in
vitro. Nakashima et al78 showed that platelets
incubated in vitro with genestein completely inhibited platelet aggregation
induced by thromboxane A2 and collagen analogues.78
The mechanisms by which this occurs are poorly understood, and the clinical
significance and application of this requires further study. Additional studies
are needed to look at the effect of isoflavones and other phytoestrogens on
lipoproteins, hemostasis, and vascular function.
HOT FLASHES OR MENOPAUSAL SYMPTOMS
Hot flashes are prevalent at menopause and are the most common reason
cited by menopausal women for starting ERT. Their prevalence varies greatly
with geographic distribution from 70% to 80% of women in the United States
to 10% to 14% in Singapore and Japan.36, 79
Interestingly, it appears that ERT does not seem to reduce the incidence of
menopausal hot flashes in Asian women. Chung et al80
carried out a double-blind study on 83 Hong Kong Chinese women with a surgical
menopause randomized to receive treatment with 0.625 mg/d of estradiol. There
was a significant increase in the serum estradiol concentration with treatment
compared with placebo (P<.001) but no significant
difference in the frequency of hot flashes between the groups. It was hypothesized
that the dietary intake of phytoestrogens could have negated the effects of
estradiol on menopausal symptoms, but actual dietary habits of the subjects
were not recorded in thi |
