 |
|
Representation of the Elderly, Women, and Minorities in Heart Failure Clinical Trials
Asefeh Heiat, MD, MPH;
Cary P. Gross, MD;
Harlan M. Krumholz, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1682-1688.
ABSTRACT
| |
Background Appropriate representation of specific groups of patients in randomized
controlled trials (RCTs) and generalizability of evidence obtained have been
questioned. We sought to compare the characteristics of patients in heart
failure (HF) RCTs with those of patients with HF in the community, and to
document these trends over time.
Methods MEDLINE was searched from 1985 through December 1999 for all HF RCTs.
Additional trials were obtained through bibliographies of the reviewed articles,
previous meta-analyses, and overviews of the HF trials. Original reports of
RCTs of interventions for chronic HF were selected if they were published
in the English language and included 50 or more participants. Publication
year, sources of support, location of principal investigator, sample size,
type of intervention, inclusion and exclusion criteria, characteristics of
participants, and the use of invasive diagnostic tests were extracted.
Results Participants in the 59 HF RCTs we reviewed were markedly different from
the patients with HF in the community. Patients in RCTs were younger, more
often male, more likely to have subnormal systolic ejection fraction, and
were most commonly white. We did not find a significant improvement in the
representation of the trials, with respect to these characteristics, among
those published recently compared with those from the late 1980s and early
1990s.
Conclusions Clinical trials are focusing on a relatively small segment of the HF
population. The consequences of underrepresenting minorities, women, and elderly
are unknown but may be particularly important for HF. Future clinical trials
should adequately include populations that carry the burden of the disease.
INTRODUCTION
RANDOMIZED controlled trials (RCTs) are considered to provide the highest
level of evidence for clinical practice, but several studies have suggested
that RCTs often do not enroll subjects who are representative of patients
seen in the community.1-6
The infrequent enrollment of older patients, women, and minorities has raised
specific concerns about the generalizability of medical evidence to these
important patient groups. In response to concerns about clinical trial generalizability
and equity, the US Congress included requirements for the inclusion of women
and minorities, but not the elderly, in the National Institutes of Health
(NIH) Revitalization Act of 1993 (Public Law 103-143).7-8
This issue is particularly important for heart failure (HF), which is
primarily a disease that affects older adults and may manifest itself differently
in the elderly. More than 80% of patients hospitalized with HF in the United
States are older than 65 years and more than 20% are 85 years or older.9 Evidence suggests that older patients who have HF
are more likely to have diastolic dysfunction, as well as a higher prevalence
of comorbid illnesses than their younger counterparts.
Heart failure also significantly impacts women and minorities; women
constitute almost 57% of patients with HF in hospitals9;
30% of these patients are nonwhites.10 This
heterogeneity is clinically relevant, as prior studies have suggested that
characteristics and outcomes of HF may vary with sex and race.11-18
Despite the burden of illness that HF imposes on members of these underrepresented
populations, little attention has been focused on their representation in
HF clinical trials and how their representation has changed over time. To
address this issue, we performed a systematic review of the RCTs that enrolled
patients with HF from 1985 through 1999. Our objective was to determine the
enrollment of elderly, women, and minorities in those trials, examine secular
changes, and assess the representation of trial subjects compared with patients
with HF in the general population.
METHODS
SOURCES OF DATA
We performed a systematic search of English-language literature to identify
all major clinical trials of treatment for chronic HF. MEDLINE was searched
from January 1985 through December 1999 for articles indexed under the subject
headings heart failure and randomized
controlled trials or clinical trials. Additional
trials were obtained from the reference lists of the reviewed articles, previous
meta-analyses, and overviews of the HF trials. These led to 642 titles. We
examined the title and abstract of those articles based on our exclusion criteria
and excluded 460 articles; 182 remaining articles needed complete evaluation.
Another 137 articles were excluded after close and entire evaluation. We selected
45 studies. We obtained an additional 14 trials from the reference lists of
the reviewed articles and previous meta-analyses and overviews of the HF trials.
Our search led to 59 clinical RCTs on the treatment of chronic HF.
STUDY SELECTION
We selected RCTs of drugs, procedures, lifestyle-related interventions,
and health services for treatment of chronic HF if they were published in
the English language and included 50 or more participants. Trials were excluded
if they were currently ongoing, were subgroup or follow-up analyses of the
original study, were reporting on the prevention or incidence of HF, or were
focused on patients with a recent myocardial infarction or acute HF as a result
of cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock.
DATA ABSTRACTION
We developed an instrument for data abstraction and a data dictionary
with detailed standardized definitions. We extracted the following information:
year of publication, sources of support, location of principal investigator,
sample size, type of intervention, inclusion and exclusion criteria, demographics
and characteristics of the study sample, and invasive diagnostic tests used
as part of the study protocol.
Heart failure RCTs were assigned to 3 five-year periods (1985-1989,
1990-1994, and 1995-1999), according to their year of publication. Intervention
type for each trial was categorized as medications, procedures, lifestyle-related
programs (patient education, diet, and exercise), or health services (disease
management/home-based interventions, care coordinator, and use of critical
pathways/clinical guidelines). Specific attention was focused on the age,
sex, and race distribution of study participants and whether these characteristics
were the source of any explicit exclusion in these trials. For each trial,
the first complete published report was our source of information. However,
for completeness, other published articles on the study, including subgroup
analyses, were also reviewed to supplement the original report.
DATA ANALYSIS
We studied the general characteristics of HF trials and evaluated their
variations over time. Mean age was calculated as weighted mean, considering
the sample size of each trial. We also compared the characteristics of trial
participants with those of patients in the general population in the United
States. The latter was obtained from the existing national or community-based
studies.10, 19-24
The  2 test was used to evaluate differences for categorical
variables. To test for a trend in demographic characteristics of the patient
samples across our study period, we performed 3 simple linear regression tests
using year of publication as the independent variable. The dependent variables
were the mean age of participants, the proportion of women, and the proportion
that were nonwhite; each study was weighted by the sample size. The simple
linear regression tests were also used to examine the association between
age and sex. Results are also presented in 3 five-year periods (1985-1989,
1990-1994, and 1995-1999), according to the year of trial publication for
the purposes of illustration. All calculations were performed using the software
system STATA 5.0 (STATA Corp, College Station, Tex). P
values of .05 or less were considered to be of statistical significance.
RESULTS
CHARACTERISTICS OF HF CLINICAL TRIALS
A total of 59 RCTs met the entry inclusion criteria; their characteristics
are summarized in Table 1. Fewer
HF RCTs were performed in the earlier periods compared with the latest period
(14, 17, and 28 for 1985-1989, 1990-1994, and 1995-1999, respectively). The
principal investigators for most HF clinical trials were located in the United
States during the 1985 through 1989 and 1990 through 1994 periods, and in
Europe during 1995 through 1999. Among the 47 trials for which sources of
support were reported, 38 (81%) received complete or partial financial support
from the pharmaceutical industry.
|
|
|
|
General Characteristics of Heart Failure Randomized Controlled Trials,
1985-1999*
|
|
|
A total of 45627 patients were randomized in these 59 trials; the number
of participants per trial ranged from 50 to 7788 (median, 253). Heart failure
trials tended to include a larger number of patients over time. Studies published
between 1995 and 1999 included more than 65% of participants in all RCTs included
in this study. Eighty-eight percent of HF trials studied the effectiveness
of drugs, 5% assessed health services interventions, 5% studied lifestyle-related
interventions, and 2% evaluated different procedures. Of note, health services
and lifestyle-related interventions, as well as procedures, were studied exclusively
in trials published from 1995 through 1999. Invasive diagnostic procedures
were used in only 4 (7%) studies as part of the study protocol.
STUDY POPULATION IN HF CLINICAL TRIALS
The mean age of the HF study population (reported in 53 trials [90%])
was 61.4 years (SD, 6.4). Participation of patients older than 80 years in
HF trials was very poorly documented; information on the age distribution
was reported for only 13 (22%; Table 1) trials. Only 4 trials (7%) with 2176 participants (5%) included patients older
than 80 years and the exact number of these patients was not reported. Another
study, which did not report the age range but reported on the age distribution,
included 282 patients and 50% of these patients were 79 years or older. Only
2 studies (7%), with a total of 1004 participants, exclusively enrolled patients
older than 65 years.
Information on sex was provided in 57 studies (97%) and women constituted
21% of study participants in those trials (Figure 1). Twelve studies (20%), which included 51% of the total
number of participants, provided information on racial distribution (Table 1). Only 15% of participants in those
studies were nonwhite (Figure 2).
None of the trials specifically targeted women or nonwhite populations.
|
|
|
|
Figure 1. Enrollment of women in heart failure
randomized controlled trials.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 2. Enrollment of nonwhites in heart
failure randomized controlled trials.
|
|
|
Six trials, which included 15000 patients, were totally or partially
funded by the NIH. Patients in those studies had a mean age of 62.3 years
and 21% were women. In the 4 NIH-funded studies that reported racial distribution,
about 16% of participants were nonwhite. In addition to 1 trial that was funded
by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the NIH, the Department of Veterans
Affairs participated in financial support for 4 trials (including 2570 patients
with a mean age of 62.1 years); 0.2% of these participants were women and
28% were nonwhite.
EXPLICIT EXCLUSION OF ELDERLY, WOMEN, AND MINORITIES
Explicit exclusion of elderly patients was part of the formal study
protocol in 17 trials (29%); these trials accounted for more than 20000 patients
(44% of total number of HF trial participants; Figure 3). The age threshold for exclusion in those trials was as
low as 70 to 75 years in 8 studies, 80 years in another 7 studies, and from
81 to 85 years in 2 others. Four studies (7%), including 3 that were supported
by the Department of Veterans Affairs, excluded women as part of their protocol.
They included 4% of the total number of participants in HF trials. Eight additional
trials, which included 13% of the remaining HF study participants, excluded
women with childbearing potential (Figure
3). None of the 59 trials had explicit exclusion of minorities as
part of their formal protocol.
|
|
|
|
Figure 3. Explicit exclusion in heart failure
randomized controlled trials.
|
|
|
EXPLICIT EXCLUSION BASED ON LEFT VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION AND
RENAL INSUFFICIENCY
A total of 37 trials (63%), including 32000 (70%) of the overall trial
participants, had explicit exclusion criteria based on left ventricular ejection
fraction (EF); most of these (32 of 37) excluded patients with an EF greater
than 40%. The number of trials that performed formal exclusion based on EF
increased substantially over time (21%, 71%, and 79% for 1985-1989, 1990-1994,
and 1995-1999 periods, respectively; Figure
3). There has been a significant increase in the practice of EF-based
exclusion in the latest period, from 1995 through 1999, compared with the
earlier trials, from 1985 through 1994 (P = .03).
Renal insufficiency was part of the formal exclusion criteria in 11
studies (19%) that included more than 19 000 (44%) of the HF clinical
trial participants. Again, the number of trials that use this exclusion criterion
was higher in the latest period compared with the 2 other periods (Table 1). In addition, 34 trials (58%)
with 24 573 participants (54%) excluded patients who had important comorbidities
that were generally defined as major hepatic, renal, or hematologic diseases.
TRENDS IN THE ENROLLMENT OF ELDERLY, WOMEN, AND MINORITIES
The mean age of trial participants increased from 58.5 years (SD, 5)
during 1985 through 1989 to 59 years (SD, 4) during 1990 through 1994, and
64 years (SD, 7) during 1995 through 1999 (Figure 4). Linear regression test showed that there was a significant
increase in mean age of the participants over time (P
= .001). Earlier HF trials were less likely to report mean age compared with
the recent trials (71%, 88%, and 100% for the 1985-1989, 1990-1994, and 1995-1999
periods, respectively). However, only a small number of investigators provided
information on age distribution and participation of older patients in the
trial, and this did not improve over time (29%, 18%, and 21% for the 1985-1989,
1990-1994, and 1995-1999 periods, respectively). The number of trials that
explicitly excluded older patients was smaller during 1995 through 1999 compared
with 1990 through 1994 (27% vs 35%), but was higher when compared with the
1985 through 1989 period (21%; Figure 3).
Nevertheless, there was no statistical difference between the number of trials
that performed this explicit exclusion in 1995 through 1999 compared with
the 2 earlier periods combined (27% vs 29%, respectively) (P = .86).
|
|
|
|
Figure 4. Mean age of patients enrolled
in heart failure randomized controlled trials.
|
|
|
Participation of women in the HF trials decreased in the 1990 through
1994 period compared with the 1985 through 1989 period (17% vs 23%) and returned
to its initial level during 1995 through 1999 (23%; Figure 1). Regression analysis showed that there was no significant
change in the proportion of women enrolled in the HF trials over time (P = .84). However, the exclusion of women by protocol design
appears to have become slightly less frequent. We also found that enrollment
of women was significantly associated with the mean age of participants in
HF trials (Figure 5; P<.001). We calculated that a 1-year increase in the mean age of
trial participants was associated with a 5% augmentation in enrollment of
women in these trials.
|
|
|
|
Figure 5. Mean age and participation of
women in heart failure randomized controlled trials.
|
|
|
Documentation of participation of minorities in the HF trials improved
over time, as more trials reported the racial distribution of their participants
over the study period (7%, 24%, and 25% during 1985-1989, 1990-1994, and 1995-1999,
respectively). Inclusion of nonwhite populations in the HF trials that provided
this information decreased steadily from the 1985 through 1989 to the 1990
through 1995 and 1995 through 1999 periods (27%, 18%, and 13%, respectively; Figure 2). However, regression analysis did
not show a significant change in the proportion of nonwhites (P = .17). Of note, only 10 trials were included in this analysis, which
probably explains the lack of statistical significance.
COMPARISON BETWEEN RCT PATIENTS AND HF PATIENTS IN THE COMMUNITY
A community-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, using the Rochester
Epidemiology Project, found that the mean age of patients receiving the first
diagnosis of HF was 77 years (SD, 12).20 Evidence
from other studies in Europe also suggests that the mean age of HF patients
in the community is older than 75 years,22-23
which is substantially higher than the mean age (61 years) that we found for
patients in HF trials (Figure 4).
In fact, only 3 trials (5%) included patients with a mean age older than 75
years.
Women were underrepresented in the HF clinical trials when compared
with their representation in the general population of HF patients, as reported
in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and surveys from Europe
(21% vs at least 50%, P<.001; Figure 1).22-24
Only 2 trials (3%) had patients with a mean age of 75 years or older, and
had at least a 50% female composition.
Finally, there was a substantial underrepresentation of nonwhites in
trials in comparison with the distribution of nonwhite patients with HF published
in the Vital and Health Statistics series (15% vs  30%, P<.001; Figure 2).10 Only 4 trials (7%) included at least 25% nonwhite
patients.
Fewer than 30% of patients with HF enrolled in HF trials had preserved
systolic EF. However, results of community and hospital-based studies from
the United States and Europe persistently show that patients with preserved
systolic EF constitute more than 50% of patients with HF.19, 23, 25-26
COMMENT
Our findings reinforce current concerns about the representation of
specific patient groups in RCTs. We showed that participants in HF clinical
trials differ markedly from those of the general population of patients with
HF in the United States. Compared with the latter, RCT patients are younger,
more often male, more likely to have subnormal systolic EF, and most commonly
white. We found that only 2 of the 59 trials reflected the general presentation
of community patients with respect to both sex and age, only 2 studies exclusively
targeted patients older than 65 years, and none particularly targeted women
or nonwhite populations. We also demonstrated that members of these populations
were underrepresented in government-funded trials (eg, those funded by the
NIH and Department of Veterans Affairs). In addition, we did not find a significant
improvement in population representation in trials published in recent years
compared with those from the late 1980s and early 1990s.
As many of the trials were multicenter and multinational, we could not
evaluate the representation of nonwhites in each trial compared with the racial
distribution of the population in the individual trial's location. However,
our goal was not to evaluate or criticize each individual trial. Rather, we
aimed to document the paucity of data specific to important subgroups of patients
with HF in the United States. Our study shows an important discrepancy between
the general characteristics of the HF trial enrollees and those of US patients
with HF in the community.
Some experts have suggested that enrolling a narrow spectrum of patients
might affect the external validity or generalizability of RCTs, which have
been hailed as the gold standard for establishing clinical efficacy.6 Previous studies have compared the enrollment in RCTs
of specific population groups with their representation in the general population
of patients with the same conclusion. These studies found that members of
specific population groups were not adequately represented in clinical trials.1, 27 Gurwitz and colleagues2
found that women and the elderly were widely excluded in clinical trials of
acute myocardial infarction from 1960 through 1990. A recent study on the
enrollment of women in National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–funded
cardiovascular clinical trials showed that women were underrepresented in
HF trials.3 Additional studies have revealed
a substantial underrepresentation of elderly in cancer trials.4-5
Two studies compared the characteristics and outcomes of trial patients with
acute myocardial infarction with those of nontrial patients at the study hospitals
and external hospitals in the same area, or with those eligible but not enrolled
in the same hospital. Those authors have raised concerns about the practice
of preferential recruitment in RCTs and reported that trial participants were
younger, were more often male, had fewer comorbid conditions, and had a survival
advantage over the nonparticipants that was larger than expected from the
intervention alone.28-29
The selected populations in the RCTs we studied appear to be the result
of both explicit and implicit exclusion criteria. We found that a large number
of trials explicitly excluded women and elderly patients. We also found that
even when age-based exclusion was not part of the formal study design, mean
age of the trial participants was markedly lower than what has been reported
by community-based studies. The skewed trial populations may be the result
of excluding patients with conditions that are disproportionately found in
specific groups (eg, the elderly) or by implicit exclusions derived from a
reluctance to enroll certain patients.
We also found that long lists of comorbid conditions and medications
were part of exclusion criteria that would most certainly lead to preferential
recruitment of younger patients in trials. Furthermore, the presence of EF-based
exclusion might widely influence the enrollment of elderly patients and women
in HF clinical trials, as studies have consistently showed that patients with
HF, with preserved systolic EF, are more likely to be older and female.19-20,23, 25, 30
Although preserved left ventricular systolic function is a common condition
among patients with HF,19-20,23, 25-26,31-33
HF trials in general did not include patients with preserved systolic EF.
There are numerous factors that discourage the enrollment of eligible
patients. There may be considerable difficulty in obtaining consent from certain
groups of patients. Prior studies have demonstrated considerable concern in
the African American community about the ethical conduct of research.34 Important sociocultural factors, particularly considering
the legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, have led many to be wary of the
motivations of researchers.35 Alternatively,
elderly patients may be less likely to participate in trials compared with
younger patients because they have decreased mobility and limited knowledge
of trials.5, 36-37
Furthermore, the concentration of trials in certain centers that may have
access to a narrow spectrum of patients might lead to the practice of preferential
recruitment.
There is likely a relation between the participation of women in trials
and the mean age of trial participants. Given that women constitute a large
proportion of patients with HF in older age groups, noninclusion of the elderly
may influence the inclusion of women in trials and vice versa. We showed that
the mean age of participants in HF trials was directly related to the proportion
of women enrolled in those trials. However, it is difficult to separate the
effects of age from sex in patients with HF since they are closely related
in the prevalence of this condition.
We also found that demographic characteristics of the trial participants
are very poorly documented in the published reports from HF trials. We showed
that only 20% of trials gave some information on the age distribution of the
enrollees in their published articles. Similarly, we found very poor documentation
on the participation of minorities. It is noteworthy that a substantial proportion
of the HF trials were performed in countries other than the United States,
which may have different distributions of racial and ethnic groups. However,
because many of the trials were multicenter and multinational, we could not
evaluate the representation of minorities in the trials located exclusively
in the United States. Sex was the only demographic characteristic that was
adequately described in the HF trials. Poor documentation of demographic characteristics
of trial participants makes it very difficult for readers to determine the
population representation and generalizability of trial results.
There are several reasons to strive for representative groups of trial
participants. First, as participants often receive the latest medical treatments,
access to trials may be considered a marker of equity. For some patients,
access to a clinical trial is synonymous with access to quality care.38 Prior studies have suggested that patients in clinical
trials, even in the control arms, tend to have better outcomes than patients
not enrolled in trials.39-40
Second, it is important to note that HF may manifest differently in
various patient populations. Certain aspects of HF, including pathophysiology,
response to treatment, clinical course, and outcomes in cardiovascular diseases,
vary as a function of age, sex, and race.41-52
Age- and sex-adjusted normative values have been suggested for different cardiovascular
and pulmonary tests.53-55
In the setting of HF, age, sex, and race differences have been demonstrated
in left ventricular adaptation and autonomic responses as well as in the clinical
course, epidemiology, and outcomes of the disease.11-18
Those differences may affect the efficacy of therapeutic strategies for patients
with HF.
It would be difficult for every trial to recruit a sample that is exactly
representative of the general population. Further, it could be argued that
unless the sample size is large enough to allow valid subgroup analysis of
the patient groups of interest, a representative sample may not be helpful.
However, when the complete portfolio of clinical research in a given illness
is considered, as we have done with HF in this analysis, the population could
be better served by a more representative group of patients in trials. To
accomplish this, investigators might develop trials that specifically target
underrepresented groups of patients instead of designing trials to mirror
the distribution of patients in the community.
Our findings suggest that published clinical trials are focusing on
a relatively small segment of the HF population. The current evidence concerning
HF has been mainly generated by trials on male, middle-aged, and white patients
and may not apply to a significant proportion of patients with HF. The consequences
of underrepresenting minorities, women, and the elderly are not known but
may be particularly important for HF. We elucidated the large gap that exists
between HF trial participants and patients with HF in the community. This
gap is very likely to keep growing along with the growing burden of HF due
to the aging of the population and the longer survival of patients with hypertension
and myocardial infarction. New strategies need to be used to generate evidence
that is directly relevant to the vast majority of HF patients. Future clinical
trials should adequately represent the populations who carry the burden of
the disease. This would be accomplished most effectively not only by striving
for representative participation in individual trials, but by designing trials
to specifically investigate HF treatment strategies in subgroups of interest.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Accepted for publication January 31, 2002.
We thank Yun Wang, MS, for his contribution in developing the database
and his assistance with data management and data analysis.
Corresponding author: Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, Yale University School
of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208025, New Haven, CT 06520-8025.
From the Department of Internal Medicine/Preventive Medicine, Griffin
Hospital, Derby, Conn (Dr Heiat); the Yale–New Haven Hospital Center
for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Conn (Drs Heiat, Gross, and
Krumholz); and the Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine
(Dr Gross), the Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine
(Dr Krumholz), and the Section of Health Policy and Administration, Department
of Epidemiology and Public Health (Dr Krumholz), Yale University School of
Medicine, New Haven, Conn. Dr Heiat is now with the Louis Stokes Cleveland
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Youngstown, Ohio.
REFERENCES
| |
1. Hall WD. Representation of blacks, women, and the very elderly (aged  80)
in 28 major randomized clinical trials. Ethn Dis. 1999;9:333-340.
PUBMED
2. Gurwitz JH, Col NF, Avorn J. The exclusion of the elderly and women from clinical trials in acute
myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1992;268:1417-1422.
ABSTRACT
3. Harris DJ, Douglas PS. Enrollment of women in cardiovascular clinical trials funded by the
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:475-480.
FREE FULL TEXT
4. Hutchins LF, Unger JM, Crowley JJ, Coltman CA Jr, Albain KS. Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment
trials. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:2061-2067.
FREE FULL TEXT
5. Trimble EL, Carter CL, Cain D, Freidlin B, Ungerleider RS, Friedman MA. Representation of older patients in cancer treatment trials. Cancer. 1994;74:2208-2214.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
6. Britton A, McKee M, Black N, McPherson K, Sanderson C, Bain C. Threats to applicability of randomised trials: exclusions and selective
participation. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999;4:112-121.
PUBMED
7. Freedman LS, Simon R, Foulkes MA, et al. Inclusion of women and minorities in clinical trials and the NIH Revitalization
Act of 1993—the perspective of NIH clinical trialists. Control Clin Trials. 1995;16:277-285.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
8. NIH Revitalization Act. Subtitle B; 1993.
9. Popovic JR, Kozak LJ. National hospital discharge survey: annual summary, 1998. Vital Health Stat 13. 2000;148:1-194.
10. Trends in the health of older Americans: United States, 1994: analytic
and epidemiologic studies No. 3. Vital Health Stat 3. 1995;30:1-328.
11. Schmieder RE, Rockstroh JK, Aepfelbacher F, Schulze B, Messerli FH. Gender-specific cardiovascular adaptation due to circadian blood pressure
variations in essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1995;8:1160-1166.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
12. Kuch B, Muscholl M, Luchner A, et al. Gender specific differences in left ventricular adaptation to obesity
and hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 1998;12:685-691.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
13. Dunlap SH, Sueta CA, Tomasko L, Adams KF Jr. Association of body mass, gender and race with heart failure primarily
due to hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:1602-1608.
FREE FULL TEXT
14. McMurray JJ, Stewart S. Epidemiology, aetiology, and prognosis of heart failure. Heart. 2000;83:596-602.
FREE FULL TEXT
15. Rich MW. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and etiology of congestive heart failure
in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:968-974.
ISI
| PUBMED
16. Adams KF Jr, Sueta CA, Gheorghiade M, et al. Gender differences in survival in advanced heart failure: insights
from the FIRST study. Circulation. 1999;99:1816-1821.
FREE FULL TEXT
17. Chin MH, Goldman L. Gender differences in 1-year survival and quality of life among patients
admitted with congestive heart failure. Med Care. 1998;36:1033-1046.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
18. Mendes LA, Davidoff R, Cupples LA, Ryan TJ, Jacobs AK. Congestive heart failure in patients with coronary artery disease:
the gender paradox. Am Heart J. 1997;134:207-212.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
19. Vasan RS, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Evans JC, Reiss CK, Levy D. Congestive heart failure in subjects with normal versus reduced left
ventricular ejection fraction: prevalence and mortality in a population-based
cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:1948-1955.
FREE FULL TEXT
20. Senni M, Tribouilloy CM, Rodeheffer RJ, et al. Congestive heart failure in the community: a study of all incident
cases in Olmsted County, Minnesota, in 1991. Circulation. 1998;98:2282-2289.
FREE FULL TEXT
21. Ho KK, Pinsky JL, Kannel WB, Levy D. The epidemiology of heart failure: the Framingham Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:6A-13A.
ISI
| PUBMED
22. Cowie MR, Wood DA, Coats AJ, et al. Incidence and aetiology of heart failure: a population-based study. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:421-428.
FREE FULL TEXT
23. Cohen-Solal A, Desnos M, Delahaye F, Emeriau JP, Hanania G. A national survey of heart failure in French hospitals: the Myocardiopathy
and Heart Failure Working Group of the French Society of Cardiology, the National
College of General Hospital Cardiologists and the French Geriatrics Society. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:763-769.
FREE FULL TEXT
24. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/NIH data fact sheet. Congestive
heart failure in the United States: a new epidemic; 1996. Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/public/heart/other/chf_abs.htm. Accessed August 2000.
25. Aronow WS, Ahn C, Kronzon I. Normal left ventricular ejection fraction in older persons with congestive
heart failure. Chest. 1998;113:867-869.
FREE FULL TEXT
26. Mosterd A, Hoes AW, de Bruyne MC, et al. Prevalence of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction in the
general population: the Rotterdam Study. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:447-455.
FREE FULL TEXT
27. Svensson CK. Representation of American blacks in clinical trials of new drugs. JAMA. 1989;261:263-265.
ABSTRACT
28. Jha P, Deboer D, Sykora K, Naylor CD. Characteristics and mortality outcomes of thrombolysis trial participants
and nonparticipants: a population-based comparison. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1335-1342.
ABSTRACT
29. van Bergen PF, Jonker JJ, Molhoek GP, et al. Characteristics and prognosis of non-participants of a multi-centre
trial of long-term anticoagulant treatment after myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 1995;49:135-141.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
30. Samuel RS, Hausdorff JM, Wei JY. Congestive heart failure with preserved systolic function: is it a
woman's disease? Womens Health Issues. 1999;9:219-222.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
31. Tresch DD, McGough MF. Heart failure with normal systolic function: a common disorder in older
people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43:1035-1042.
ISI
| PUBMED
32. Kupari M, Lindroos M, Iivanainen AM, Heikkila J, Tilvis R. Congestive heart failure in old age: prevalence, mechanisms and 4-year
prognosis in the Helsinki Ageing Study. J Intern Med. 1997;241:387-394.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
33. Aronow WS, Ahn C, Kronzon I. Comparison of incidences of congestive heart failure in older African-Americans,
Hispanics, and whites. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:611-612, A9.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
34. Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, Williams MV, Moody-Ayers S. Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in
medical research. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:537-546.
FULL TEXT
|
|
