 |
|
A Twin Study of Erectile Dysfunction
Mary E. Fischer, PhD;
Mary Ellen Vitek;
Don Hedeker, PhD;
William G. Henderson, PhD;
Steven J. Jacobsen, MD, PhD;
Jack Goldberg, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:165-168.
ABSTRACT
| |
Background The extent of genetic influence on erectile dysfunction (ED) is unknown. This study determines the contribution of heredity to ED in a sample of middle-aged men.
Methods A classical twin study was conducted in the Vietnam Era Twin Registry, a national sample of male-male pairs (mean birth year, 1949) who served on active duty during the Vietnam era (1965-1975). A 1999 male health survey was completed by 890 monozygotic (MZ) and 619 dizygotic (DZ) pairs. The prevalence and heritability of 2 self-report indicators of ED, difficulty in having an erection and in maintaining an erection, are estimated.
Results The prevalence of difficulty in having an erection is 23.3% and in maintaining an erection is 26.7%. Twin correlations for dysfunction in having an erection are 0.35 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.41) in MZ and 0.17 (95% CI, 0.09-0.27) in DZ pairs. For dysfunction in maintaining an erection, the twin correlations in MZ and DZ pairs are 0.39 (95% CI, 0.32-0.45) and 0.18 (95% CI, 0.09-0.27), respectively. The estimated heritability of liability for dysfunction in having an erection is 35% and in maintaining an erection is 42%. The heritable influence on ED remained significant after adjustment for ED risk factors.
Conclusions The present study demonstrates an ED-specific genetic component that is independent of genetic influences from numerous ED risk factors. The results suggest that future molecular genetic studies to identify ED-related polymorphisms are warranted.
INTRODUCTION
ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION (ED), defined as the inability to achieve or maintain an erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual performance,1 is a highly prevalent condition that is increasing with the number of older men in the population. Several factors have been shown to be related to ED prevalence, including age, hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, cigarette smoking, alcohol use, obesity, and lipid disorders.2-16 Inverse relationships of ED with higher education and physical activity have also been observed.2-4,7, 11, 17 To our knowledge, the role of genetic factors for ED has never been investigated. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence and genetic influence on ED in a sample of middle-aged twin pairs.
METHODS
Study participants are members of the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry. The VET Registry was established in the early 1980s and consists of 7368 male-male monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs, born between the years 1939 and 1957, with both members of the pair having served in the US military during the Vietnam era (1965-1975).18-19 In 1987, a mail and telephone survey collected information to classify zygosity using an approach with an approximate 95% accuracy rate.20 In total, 4774 pairs responded to the survey, of which 53.5% were MZ pairs, 43.8% were DZ pairs, and 2.7% could not be classified.
In 1999, a male health survey was sent to 10 762 VET Registry members (included 4636 pairs). With 2 mailed follow-ups, a response rate of 49.8% (5361 individuals; 1621 pairs) was achieved. The response rate was slightly higher among the MZ twins (51.2%) compared with the DZ twins (49.1%). Only pairs with ED information from both members are included in the present study, which leads to an analytic sample of 1509 twin pairs. All survey procedures were approved by the Hines VA Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center Human Subjects Committee.
The measurement of ED included 2 questions about the difficulty in the past month of (1) having an erection and (2) maintaining an erection. Twins rated their abilities along a 6-point scale ranging from very good to no erection. Responses to the ordinal questions were each significantly (P<.001) correlated with the self-report of a physician diagnosis of ED; for this analysis we chose the self-rated measures because it is not confounded by treatment-seeking behavior and is consistent with previous epidemiologic research.2-3,5, 12, 21 Risk factor data for ED were also collected in the survey and included diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, body shape, cigarette smoking, and alcohol use.
The prevalence of ED is estimated (in percentage with 95% confidence interval [CI]) for all twins and for 3 age groupings (42-49, 50-51, and 52-60 years) corresponding to approximate tertiles. For the prevalence estimates, ED is dichotomized comparing those with responses of fair, poor, very poor, and no erection with those with responses of very good and good. In the classical twin study analysis, the within-pair correlation of ED in MZ pairs (sharing 100% of their genes) is compared with the within-pair correlation of ED in DZ pairs (sharing 50% of their genes); MZ correlations greater than DZ correlations imply genetic influence. The correlations are estimated using a multilevel, mixed-effects regression model specifying a probit link function with separate random effects for MZ and DZ twin pairs.22 The significance of the difference in the MZ and DZ within-pair correlations was determined through the likelihood ratio  2 test statistic. Heritability, defined as the percentage of the phenotypic variance in the liability to ED due to genetic factors, was estimated from the within-pair correlations.23 In this context, it is equivalent to 2(rMZ - rDZ). Adjustment for age, diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, body shape (surrogate for obesity), cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption was made by including these factors as covariates in the regression model. A P value less than .05 was considered significant.
Prevalence was estimated using the SAS System for Windows version 8 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Mixed-effects regression modeling was performed using the MIXOR program.24
RESULTS
Complete ED data are available for 890 MZ and 619 DZ pairs. The mean age of the sample at the time of the 1999 survey is 50.5 years in both the MZ and DZ pairs (Table 1). In addition, the distributions of the remaining ED risk factors used for adjustment do not differ significantly by zygosity, with the exception of alcohol use in the month prior to survey completion (P<.01). The prevalence of ED defined as difficulty in having an erection is 23.3% (Table 2). There is a significant trend in the age-specific prevalences, increasing from 21.4% in the youngest group to 24.8% in the oldest group (P = .07). The prevalence of ED defined as difficulty in maintaining an erection is 26.7% and also demonstrates a direct relationship with age (P = .02).
|
|
|
|
Table 1. Prevalence of Erectile Dysfunction Risk Factors by Zygosity*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2. Prevalence of Erectile Dysfunction According to Age in 1999*
|
|
|
Table 3 presents the unadjusted twin correlations and heritability estimates for both ED measures. Overall, the correlations for difficulty in having an erection are 0.35 (95% CI, 0.28-0.41) for MZ and 0.17 (95% CI, 0.09-0.27) for DZ pairs. With respect to maintaining an erection, the correlations in the MZ and DZ pairs are 0.39 (95% CI, 0.32-0.45) and 0.18 (95% CI, 0.09-0.27), respectively. The differences in the MZ and DZ correlations for both measures of ED are highly significant. The heritability of liability for difficulty in having an erection is estimated to be 35%. For difficulty in maintaining an erection, the estimated heritability is 42%.
|
|
|
|
Table 3. Unadjusted Twin Correlations and Heritability Estimates for Erectile Dysfunction*
|
|
|
Adjustment for age, diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, body shape, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption does not appreciably alter the magnitude of the correlations or the significance of the differences in the MZ and DZ correlations (Table 4). The adjusted estimated heritabilities of liability are 29% for difficulty in having an erection and 36% for difficulty in maintaining an erection.
|
|
|
|
Table 4. Adjusted Twin Correlations and Heritability Estimates for Erectile Dysfunction*
|
|
|
COMMENT
Our results indicate that there is a genetic component involved in the etiology of ED. This component has an effect that is independent of the genetic influences of the established ED risk factors. Many of the factors responsible for ED may exert their influence through genetic as well as environmental mechanisms. These influences include the effects of known risk factors in addition to the effects of factors yet to be discovered. What is known is that age, lower education, diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, cigarette smoking, alcohol use, obesity, lack of physical activity, and lipid disorders most likely contribute to ED development.1-16 What is not known is the precise nature of the relationships between ED and these factors, their interaction with one another, and whether there are other physical health, psychological, and lifestyle/behavioral factors that contribute to ED risk. The mechanism underlying the inheritance of ED is also not known. Possible candidates are polymorphisms for endothelial nitric oxide synthase (an enzyme involved in the production of nitrous oxide, a neurotransmitter involved in cavernosal smooth muscle relaxation) and for angiotensin-converting enzyme (involved in regulation of the penile cavernous smooth muscle tone).25-27 Also of particular interest are expression studies of phosphodiesterase genes in human cavernous tissue and the expression of the arginase II gene in the cavernous tissue of patients with diabetes.28-30
The present study has a number of potential limitations. The response rate was approximately 50%. While this is modest, it is similar to previous studies of this sensitive topic, including the Massachusetts Male Aging Study.4, 31-33 It is unlikely that nonresponse bias is producing the significant heritable effects—to do so would mean that the likelihood of response from ED-concordant MZ pairs relative to all MZ pairs was different than the likelihood of response from ED-concordant DZ pairs relative to all DZ pairs.
The use of self-reported ED is also of concern, yet studies have suggested that self-reported ED is the most appropriate method for assessing this condition.34-35 In addition, it has been shown that a self-administered questionnaire such as the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) can provide a valid diagnosis of ED and its severity along with a valid assessment of treatment-related changes in ED severity.21, 36-37 As an indication of the validity of the ED items used in the present study, we demonstrated a highly significant association with the report of a physician diagnosis of ED.
Another possible limitation of our study is that information on the presence of a sexual partner was not collected, and the questions used in the measurement of ED are not restricted to those with partners. As a consequence, the self-report of ED could be affected by the absence of a sexual partner. However, using marital status as a surrogate for partner availability, a number of studies have suggested that marital status is not significantly related to the prevalence of ED after adjustment for age.6-7,11, 38 Lastly, our sample is relatively young and is composed solely of men who served in the military during the Vietnam era.
The independent, ED-specific genetic influence identified in the present study should be confirmed and further elucidated in longitudinal follow-up studies of our cohort into the years of highest ED prevalence. A better understanding of the etiology of ED can build on these results, concentrating on molecular genetic studies to identify polymorphisms contributing to ED development.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
| |
Corresponding author: Jack Goldberg, PhD, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, VET Registry/Seattle ERIC (MS 152E), 1660 S Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108 (e-mail: goldie1{at}u.washington.edu).
Accepted for publication February 21, 2003.
The US Department of Veterans Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program, Research and Development Service (Washington, DC) has provided financial support for the development and maintenance of the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry. Numerous organizations have provided invaluable assistance in the conduct of this study, including the Department of Defense (Arlington, Va); National Personnel Records Center, National Archives and Records Administration (Washington, DC); the Internal Revenue Service (Washington, DC); National Opinion Research Center (Chicago, Ill); National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences (Washington, DC); and the Institute for Survey Research, Temple University (Philadelphia, Pa).
We thank David Penson, MD, MPH, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, for his careful review of the manuscript and his insightful comments. Most importantly, we gratefully acknowledge the continued cooperation and participation of the members of the VET Registry and their families. Without their contribution this research would not have been possible.
From the Vietnam Era Twin Registry/Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Wash (Drs Fischer and Goldberg); Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Hines VA Hospital, Hines, Ill (Ms Vitek and Dr Henderson); Epidemiology-Biostatistics Division, University of Illinois-Chicago (Dr Hedeker); and Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minn (Dr Jacobsen). The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.
REFERENCES
1. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel on Impotence. Impotence. JAMA. 1993;270:83-90.
FREE FULL TEXT
2. Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, Krane RJ, McKinlay JB. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol. 1994;151:54-61.
ISI
| PUBMED
3. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States, prevalence and predictors. JAMA. 1999;281:537-544.
FREE FULL TEXT
4. Johannes CB, Araujo AB, Feldman FA, Derby CA, Kleinman KP, McKinlay JB. Incidence of erectile dysfunction in men 40 to 69 years old: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol. 2000;163:460-463.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
5. Parazzini F, Menchini FF, Bortolotti A, et al. Frequency and determinants of erectile dysfunction in Italy. Eur Urol. 2000;37:43-49.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
6. Martin-Morales A, Sanchez-Cruz JJ, Saenz de Tajad I, Rodriguez-Vela L, Jimenez-Cruz JF, Burgos-Rodriguez R. Prevalence and independent risk factors for erectile dysfunction in Spain: results of the Epidemiologia de la Disfuncion Erectil Masculina Study. J Urol. 2001;166:569-575.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
7. Duarte Moreira E Jr, Najjar Abdo CH, Barreto Torres E, Lisboa Lobo CF, Saraiva Fittpaldi JA. Prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction: results of the Brazilian Study of Sexual Behavior. Urology. 2001;58:583-588.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
8. Green JS, Holden ST, Ingram P, Bose P, St George DP, Bowsher WG. An investigation of erectile dysfunction in Gwent, Wales. BJU Int. 2001;88:551-553.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
9. Grimm RH Jr, Grandits G, Svendsen K. Sexual problems and antihypertensive drug treatment: results of the Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study (TOMHS) [abstract 634]. J Urol. 1996;155:469A.
FULL TEXT
10. Derby CA, Barbour MM, Hume AL, McKinlay JB. Drug therapy and prevalence of erectile dysfunction in the Massachusetts Male Aging Study cohort. Pharmacotherapy. 2001;21:676-683.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
11. Klein R, Klein BEK, Lee KE, Moss S, Cruickshanks KJ. Prevalence of self-reported erectile dysfunction in people with long-term IDDM. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:135-141.
ABSTRACT
12. Mannino DM, Klevens RM, Flanders WD. Cigarette smoking: an independent risk factor for impotence? Am J Epidemiol. 1994;140:1003-1008.
FREE FULL TEXT
13. Feldman HA, Johannes CB, Derby CA, et al. Erectile dysfunction and coronary risk factors: prospective results from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. Prev Med. 2000;30:328-338.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
14. McVary KT, Carrier S, Wessells H, Subcommittee on Smoking and Erectile Dysfunction Socioeconomic Committee, Sexual Medicine Society of North America. Smoking and erectile dysfunction: evidence based analysis. J Urol. 2001;166:1624-1632.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
15. Schachter M. Erectile dysfunction and lipid disorders. Curr Med Res Opin. 2000;16(suppl 1):S9-S12.
16. Sullivan ME, Miller MA, Bell CR, et al. Fibrinogen, lipoprotein (a) and lipids in patients with erectile dysfunction: a preliminary study. Int Angiol. 2001;20:195-199.
ISI
| PUBMED
17. Aytac IA, Araujo AB, Johannes CB, Kleinman KP, McKinlay JB. Socioeconomic factors and incidence of erectile dysfunction: findings of the longitudinal Massachusetts Male Aging Study. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:771-778.
18. Eisen S, True W, Goldberg J, Henderson W, Robinette CD. The Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry: method of construction. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma). 1987;36:61-66.
PUBMED
19. Goldberg J, Henderson WG, Eisen SA, et al. A strategy for assembling samples of adult twin pairs in the United States. Stat Med. 1993;12:1693-1702.
ISI
| PUBMED
20. Eisen S, Neuman R, Goldberg J, Rice J, True W. Determining zygosity in the Vietnam Era Twin Registry: an approach using questionnaires. Clin Genet. 1989;35:423-432.
ISI
| PUBMED
21. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997;49:822-830.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
22. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD. A random-effects ordinal regression model for multilevel analysis. Biometrics. 1994;50:933-944.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
23. Guo G, Wang J. The mixed or multilevel model for behavior genetic analysis. Behav Genet. 2002;32:37-49.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
24. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD. MIXOR: a computer program for mixed-effects ordinal regression analyses. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1996;49:157-176.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
25. Burnett AL, Lowenstein CJ, Bredt DS, Chang TS, Snyder SH. Nitric oxide: a physiologic mediator of penile erection. Science. 1992;257:401-403.
FREE FULL TEXT
26. Rajfer J, Aronson WJ, Bush PA, Dorey FJ, Ignarro LJ. Nitric oxide as a mediator of relaxation of the corpus cavernosum in response to nonadrenergic, noncholinergic neurotransmission. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:90-94.
ABSTRACT
27. Becker AJ, Uckert S, Stief CF, et al. Possible role of bradykinin and angiotensin II in the regulation of penile erection and detumescence. Urology. 2001;57:193-198.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
28. Kuthe A, Magert H, Uckert S, Forssmann WG, Stief CG, Jonas U. Gene expression of the phosphodiesterases 3A and 5A in human corpus cavernosum penis. Eur Urol. 2000;38:108-114.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
29. Kuthe A, Wiedenroth A, Magert HJ, et al. Expression of different phosphodiesterase genes in human cavernous smooth muscle. J Urol. 2001;165:280-283.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
30. Bivalacqua TJ, Hellstrom WJ, Kadowitz PJ, Champion HC. Increased expression of arginase II in human diabetic corpus cavernosum: in diabetic-associated erectile dysfunction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;283:923-927.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
31. Braun M, Wassmer G, Klotz T, Reifenrath B, Mathers M, Engelmann U. Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction: results of the "Cologne Male Survey." Int J Impot Res. 2000;12:305-311.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
32. Ansong KS, Lewis C, Jenkins P, Bell J. Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction: a community-based study in rural New York State. Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10:293-296.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
33. Blanker MH, Bosch JL, Groeneveld FP, et al. Erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction in a community-based sample of men 50 to 78 years old: prevalence, concern, and relation to sexual activity. Urology. 2001;57:763-768.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
34. Anderson BL, Broffit B. Is there a reliable and valid self-report measure of sexual function? Arch Sex Behav. 1988;17:509-525.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
35. Rosen RC. Sexual function assessment in the male: physiological and self-report measures. Int J Impot Res. 1998;10:S59-S63.
36. Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC, Smith MD, Mishra A, Osterloh IH. Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. Urology. 1999;54:346-351.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
37. Cappelleri JC, Siegel RL, Osterloh IH, Rosen RC. Relationship between patient self-assessment of erectile function and the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. Urology. 2000;56:477-481.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
38. Blanker MH, Bohnen AM, Groeneveld FPMJ, et al. Correlates for erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction in older Dutch men: a community-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:436-442.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
|
