You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 17, September 28, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Research Letters
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Viral Infections
 •Patient-Physician Relationship, Other
 •Public Health
 •Immunization
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?


Reducing Missed Opportunities to Vaccinate Adults Against Influenza: What Is Realistic?

Jürgen Maurer, PhD; Katherine M. Harris, PhD; Nicole Lurie, MD, MSPH

Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(17):1633-1634.

Despite well-documented evidence regarding effectiveness and safety, uptake of influenza vaccine among adults in the United States falls short of targeted rates.1-2 Efforts to increase influenza vaccine uptake have focused on reducing the number of so-called missed opportunities, ie, patients who visit health care providers during the fall without being vaccinated.1, 3 Yet, the potential effectiveness of provider-based strategies for reducing missed opportunities (eg, standing orders, computerized reminders) may be overstated without consideration of patients' willingness to be vaccinated. We present a more realistic estimate of the potential of such strategies to increase influenza vaccine uptake by quantifying the number of unvaccinated adults most amenable to vaccination during a fall visit to a health care provider.

Methods



We analyzed data from a nationally representative survey of US adults 18 years and older (N = 5067) fielded by Knowledge Networks, Menlo Park, California, between March 4 and April 7, 2009. Knowledge Networks operates an online panel of households that covers both the online and offline populations.4 Sixty-nine percent of sampled panelists responded to the survey. Self-reported influenza vaccination rates derived from the Knowledge Networks panel compare well with those derived from the National Health Interview Survey.5

The survey asked respondents about receipt of influenza vaccine, visits to health care providers during the period from October through December 2008, and willingness to be vaccinated based on a "strong recommendation" from a health care provider. We assessed indications for influenza vaccine based on self-reported age and high-risk health conditions.1 Missed opportunities are calculated as the number of unvaccinated patients with at least 1 health care provider visit between October and December 2008, with or without accounting for patients' willingness to be vaccinated. Uptake and missed opportunity rates were weighted to be nationally representative using the Current Population Survey.6 Estimated numbers of vaccinated and unvaccinated adults were obtained by scaling up estimated vaccination and missed opportunity rates as well as disease prevalence based on the size of the total adult population as of November 1, 2008.7 All calculations were performed using STATA SE version 10.1 software (StataCorp, College Station, Texas).


Results

The Table presents estimates of influenza vaccine uptake, missed opportunities derived from vaccination and fall visit data alone, and an adjusted measure of missed opportunities that is limited to the subgroup of unvaccinated adults who were amenable to being vaccinated based on a health care provider's recommendation. Calculating missed opportunities based on vaccination and care use data alone reveals that there are more than 53 million US adults who had at least 1 health care provider contact between October and December 2008 and nonetheless remained unvaccinated. Vaccinating all of these patients would increase overall vaccination uptake by 23.1 percentage points and result in an overall uptake rate of approximately 62%. Eliminating missed opportunities among those with specific vaccine indications would increase uptake by 19.7 percentage points (diabetes) to 27.4 percentage points (asthma).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Table. Estimated Influenza Vaccine Uptake Among Adultsa and Missed Opportunities to Vaccinate During the 2008-2009 Influenza Vaccination Season


Eliminating missed opportunities only among those willing to be vaccinated would result in a 14.4–percentage point increase in vaccine uptake among the general adult population, leading to an overall vaccination rate of approximately 53%. Corresponding subpopulation increases in immunization rates range from 9.6 (diabetes) to 17.5 (asthma) percentage points.


Comment

We showed that reducing missed opportunities among the subgroup of adults amenable to health care provider recommendation could yield substantially higher influenza vaccine uptake rates. Our results also suggest that there is a sizable subgroup of patients who see health care providers during the vaccination season, but may be unwilling to get vaccinated in the absence of outreach efforts aimed at overcoming their resistance. Thus, strategies aimed at fully eliminating missed vaccination opportunities need to consider the preferences and beliefs of this group.


AUTHOR INFORMATION

Correspondence: Dr Maurer, RAND Corporation, 1200 S Hayes St, Arlington, VA 22202 (jmaurer{at}rand.org).

Author Contributions: All authors had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Maurer, Harris, and Lurie. Acquisition of data: Maurer, Harris, and Lurie. Analysis and interpretation of data: Maurer, Harris, and Lurie. Drafting of the manuscript: Maurer, Harris, and Lurie. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Maurer, Harris, and Lurie. Statistical analysis: Maurer, Harris, and Lurie. Obtained funding: Harris and Lurie. Study supervision: Lurie.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by GlaxoSmithKline.

Role of the Sponsor: The sponsor had no role in the research design or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Disclaimer: The study design, data management, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not represent those of RAND or GlaxoSmithKline.


REFERENCES

1. Fiore AE, Shay DK, Broder K; et al, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Prevention and control of influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2008. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2008;57(RR-7):1-60. PUBMED
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Influenza: self-reported vaccination coverage trends 1989-2007. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/stats-surv/imz-coverage.htm#nhis. Accessed May 13, 2009.
3. Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME; et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(9):641-651. FREE FULL TEXT
4. Knowledge Networks. KnowledgePanel: fact sheet. http://www.knowledgenetworks.com/knpanel/KnowledgePanel.pdf. Accessed May 12, 2009.
5. Harris KM, Schonlau M, Lurie N. Surveying a nationally representative internet-based panel to obtain timely estimates of influenza vaccination rates. Vaccine. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.11.052. 2009;27(6):815-818. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
6. Knowledge Networks. Field Report: Influenza Vaccine Tracking Survey 2009. Menlo Park, CA: Knowledge Networks; 2009.
7. US Census Bureau. Resident population: national population estimates for the 2000s, 11/1/2008. http://www.census.gov/popest/national/asrh/2007-nat-res.html. Accessed May 12, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.