 |
|
Advertising, Patient Decision Making, and Self-referral for Computed Tomographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Judy Illes, PhD;
Dylan Kann, BA;
Kim Karetsky, BA;
Phillip Letourneau, BA;
Thomas A. Raffin, MD;
Pamela Schraedley-Desmond, PhD;
Barbara A. Koenig, PhD;
Scott W. Atlas, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:2415-2419.
Background Self-referred imaging is one of the latest health care services to be marketed directly to consumers. Most aspects of these services are unregulated, and little is known about the messages in advertising used to attract potential consumers. We conducted a detailed analysis of print advertisements and informational brochures for self-referred imaging with respect to themes, content, accuracy, and emotional valence.
Methods Forty print advertisements from US newspapers around the country and 20 informational brochures were analyzed by 2 independent raters according to 7 major themes: health care technology; emotion, empowerment, and assurance; incentives; limited supporting evidence; popular appeal; statistics; and images. The Fisher exact test was used to identify significant differences in information content.
Results Both the advertisements and the brochures emphasized health care and technology information and provided assurances of good health and incentives to self-refer. These materials also encouraged consumers to seek further information from company resources; virtually none referred to noncomplying sources of information or to the risks of having a scan. Images of people commonly portrayed European Americans. We found statistical differences between newspaper advertisements and mailed brochures for references to "prevalence of disease" (P<.001), "death" (P<.003), and "radiation" (P<.001). Statements lacking clear scientific evidence were identified in 38% of the advertisements (n = 15) and 25% of the brochures (n = 5).
Conclusions Direct-to-consumer marketing of self-referred imaging services, in both print advertisements and informational brochures, fails to provide prospective consumers with comprehensive balanced information vital to informed autonomous decision making. Professional guidelines and oversight for advertising and promotion of these services are needed.
Author Affiliations: Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics (Drs Illes, Raffin, and Koenig, Messrs Kann and Letourneau, and Ms Karetsky), Program in Human Biology (Mr Kann), and Departments of Radiology (Drs Illes, Schraedley-Desmond, and Atlas), Medicine (Dr Raffin), and Neurology and Neurological Sciences (Dr Koenig), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
RELATED ARTICLE
Unregulated Direct-to-Consumer Marketing and Self-referral for Screening Imaging Services: A Call to Action
Patrick G. O’Malley and Allen J. Taylor
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(22):2406-2408.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
The Use of CT for Screening: A National Survey of Radiologists' Activities and Attitudes
Burger et al.
Radiology 2008;248:160-168.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Atherosclerosis imaging of asymptomatic individuals: is the sales cart before the evidence horse?
O'Malley
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1065-1068.
FULL TEXT
Noninvasive Screening for Coronary Artery Disease With Computed Tomography Is Useful
Clouse et al.
Circulation 2006;113:125-146.
FULL TEXT
Unregulated Direct-to-Consumer Marketing and Self-referral for Screening Imaging Services: A Call to Action
O'Malley and Taylor
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2406-2408.
FULL TEXT
|
