You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 166 No. 14, July 24, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Editor's Correspondence
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 •Pain
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Acupuncture Randomized Trials Study (Back Pain) Was Unblinded Too Early

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The study by Brinkhaus et al1 was published online in August 20032 and was also made available through German libraries free of charge also to patients. This potentially unblinding publication made public all the secret details of the study under discussion: all verum and sham acupuncture points were described in great detail. This enabled some interested patients to identify to which group (verum or placebo) they belonged, while they were probably still being followed up.

In the study under discussion,1 2 evaluators had to analyze patients' back pain diaries. Whenever patients made remarks in their diaries relating to the locations of their acupuncture needles, evaluators could guess to which group the patients belonged. The probability of that guess to be true was higher than mere chance when evaluators had been unblinded.

Whenever a patient mentioned that the acupuncturist inserted the needles only a little bit and that this was not . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION
Dieter Wettig, PhD, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

The Acupuncture Randomized Trials Study (Back Pain) Was Unblinded Too Early—Reply
Benno Brinkhaus, Claudia Witt, Stefan Willich, Klaus Linde, and Dieter Melchart
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(14):1528.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acupuncture in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Benno Brinkhaus, Claudia M. Witt, Susanne Jena, Klaus Linde, Andrea Streng, Stefan Wagenpfeil, Dominik Irnich, Heinz-Ulrich Walther, Dieter Melchart, and Stefan N. Willich
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(4):450-457.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.