You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 166 No. 3, February 13, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Treatment Adherence
 •Adherence
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Adherence to Black Box Warnings for Prescription Medications in Outpatients

Karen E. Lasser, MD, MPH; Diane L. Seger, RPh; D. Tony Yu, MD, MPH; Andrew S. Karson, MD, MPH; Julie M. Fiskio, BS; Andrew C. Seger, PharmD; Nidhi R. Shah, MD, MPH; Tejal K. Gandhi, MD, MPH; Jeffrey M. Rothschild, MD, MPH; David W. Bates, MD, MSc

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:338-344.

Background  Few data are available regarding the prevalence of potentially dangerous drug-drug, drug-laboratory, and drug-disease interactions among outpatients. Our objectives were to determine how frequently clinicians prescribe drugs in violation of black box warnings for these issues and to determine how frequently such prescribing results in harm.

Methods  In an observational study of 51 outpatient practices using an electronic health record, we measured the frequency with which patients received prescriptions in violation of black box warnings for drug-drug, drug-laboratory, and/or drug-disease interactions. We performed medical record reviews in a sample of patients to detect adverse drug events. Multivariate analysis was conducted to assess the relationship of prescribing in violation of black box warnings to patient and clinician characteristics, adjusting for potential confounders and clustering.

Results  Of 324 548 outpatients who received a medication in 2002, 2354 (0.7%) received a prescription in violation of a black box warning. After adjustment, receipt of medication in violation of a black box warning was more likely when patients were 75 years or older or female. The number of medications taken, the number of medical problems, and the site of care were also associated with violations. Less than 1% of patients who received a drug in violation of a black box warning had an adverse drug event as a result.

Conclusions  About 7 in 1000 outpatients received a prescription violating a black box warning. Few incidents resulted in detectable harm.


Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance and Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Mass (Dr Lasser); Partners HealthCare System, Wellesley, Mass (Mss Seger and Fiskio and Drs Seger and Bates); Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (Drs Yu, Seger, Shah, Gandhi, Rothschild, and Bates); Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (Dr Karson); and Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston (Dr Seger).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Randomized Trial of Electronic Clinical Reminders to Improve Medication Laboratory Monitoring
Matheny et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2008;15:424-429.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Randomized Trial of the Effectiveness of On-demand versus Computer-triggered Drug Decision Support in Primary Care
Tamblyn et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2008;15:430-438.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Utility of Adding Retrospective Medication Profiling to Computerized Provider Order Entry in an Ambulatory Care Population
Glassman et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007;14:424-431.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Review of eight restricted-access programs and potential implications for pharmacy
Evans and Evans
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:1302-1310.
FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of Serious Adverse Drug Reactions: A Proactive Pharmacovigilance Program (RADAR) vs Safety Activities Conducted by the Food and Drug Administration and Pharmaceutical Manufacturers
Bennett et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1041-1049.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effect of Antidepressant Warnings on Prescribing Trends in Ontario, Canada
Kurdyak et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2007;97:750-754.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medication-related Clinical Decision Support in Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems: A Review
Kuperman et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007;14:29-40.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Highlights and a hidden hazard--the FDA's new labeling regulations.
Avorn and Shrank
NEJM 2006;354:2409-2411.
FULL TEXT  

Serious Adverse Drug Effects -- Seeing the Trees through the Forest
Gurwitz
NEJM 2006;354:1413-1415.
FULL TEXT  

Black Box Warnings and Prescribing Habits in an Outpatient Setting
Journal Watch Dermatology 2006;2006:3-3.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.