You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 167 No. 13, July 9, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Identifying High-Quality Hospitals

Consult the Ratings or Flip a Coin?

Sean Michael O’Brien, PhD; Eric D. Peterson, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(13):1342-1344.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

If you or someone you know experiences an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), it is natural to want to be treated at a "high-quality" hospital. Yet how does one know which hospitals measure up? In the past, objective information was scarce, and a hospital's reputation might well reflect the quantity of marble in its lobby rather than any true evidence of quality. But the world is changing, and the past decade has seen a proliferation of information aimed at helping consumers select among health care providers (hospitals and physicians). Ratings, rankings, and scorecards are now published by a variety of organizations, including federal and state agencies, nonprofit accrediting organizations, commercial companies, and the media. Although consumers might reasonably expect such information to be reliable, relatively little is known about the comparative accuracy or consistency of these alternative quality measurement systems.

One popular and . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

"America's Best Hospitals" in the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Oliver J. Wang, Yun Wang, Judith H. Lichtman, Elizabeth H. Bradley, Sharon-Lise T. Normand, and Harlan M. Krumholz
Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(13):1345-1351.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Better Outcomes for Patients Treated at Hospitals That Participate in Clinical Trials
Majumdar et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:657-662.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nothing But the Best?
Journal Watch Cardiology 2007;2007:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.