This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Quality of Care, Other  • Informatics/ Internet in Medicine  • Medical Informatics  • Alert me on articles by topic

Jeffrey A. Linder, MD, MPH; Jun Ma, MD, RD, PhD; David W. Bates, MD, MSc; Blackford Middleton, MD, MPH, MSc; Randall S. Stafford, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(13):1400-1405.

Background  Electronic health records (EHRs) have been proposed as a sustainable solution for improving the quality of medical care. We assessed the association between EHR use, as implemented, and the quality of ambulatory care in a nationally representative survey.

Methods  We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of visits in the 2003 and 2004 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. We examined EHR use throughout the United States and the association of EHR use with 17 ambulatory quality indicators. Performance on quality indicators was defined as the percentage of applicable visits in which patients received recommended care.

Results  Electronic health records were used in 18% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15%-22%) of the estimated 1.8 billion ambulatory visits (95% CI, 1.7-2.0 billion) in the United States in 2003 and 2004. For 14 of the 17 quality indicators, there was no significant difference in performance between visits with vs without EHR use. Categories of these indicators included medical management of common diseases, recommended antibiotic prescribing, preventive counseling, screening tests, and avoiding potentially inappropriate medication prescribing in elderly patients. For 2 quality indicators, visits to medical practices using EHRs had significantly better performance: avoiding benzodiazepine use for patients with depression (91% vs 84%; P = .01) and avoiding routine urinalysis during general medical examinations (94% vs 91%; P = .003). For 1 quality indicator, visits to practices using EHRs had significantly worse quality: statin prescribing to patients with hypercholesterolemia (33% vs 47%; P = .01).

Conclusion  As implemented, EHRs were not associated with better quality ambulatory care.

Author Affiliations: Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Drs Linder, Bates, and Middleton); and Program on Prevention Outcomes and Practices, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California (Drs Ma and Stafford). Dr Ma is now with the Department of Health Services Research, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, California.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

EHR Safety: The Way Forward to Safe and Effective Systems
Walker et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2008;15:272-277.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Simply no time? Barriers to GPs' participation in primary health care research
Hummers-Pradier et al.
Fam Pract 2008;0:cmn015v1-cmn015.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Promoting Electronic Health Record Adoption. Is It the Correct Focus?
Simborg
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2008;15:127-129.
FULL TEXT  

Health Care as If Health Mattered
Frieden and Mostashari
JAMA 2008;299:950-952.
FULL TEXT  

Using Computer-Based Decision Support to Close the "Know Do" Gap in Lipid-Lowering Therapy
Avorn and Choudhry
Circulation 2008;117:336-337.
FULL TEXT  

Global Health and Primary Care Research
Beasley et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20:518-526.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT