 |
|
Hospitalist Care and Length of Stay in Patients Requiring Complex Discharge Planning and Close Clinical Monitoring
William N. Southern, MD, MS;
Matthew A. Berger, MD;
Eran Y. Bellin, MD;
Susan M. Hailpern, DrPH, MS;
Julia H. Arnsten, MD, MPH
Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(17):1869-1874.
Background Academic medical centers are increasingly employing hospitalists to staff teaching wards. Although studies have demonstrated reduced lengths of stay (LOSs) associated with hospitalist care, it is unclear which patients are most likely to benefit. We sought to determine whether patients with specific diagnoses or discharge needs account for the association between hospitalist care and reduced LOS.
Methods Hospital admissions were divided into the following 2 groups based on type of attending physician: teaching hospitalist (full-time faculty hospitalist with no outpatient responsibilities) vs nonhospitalist (full-time or voluntary faculty contributing 1 or 2 months of teaching service per year). We included all patients discharged from an academic teaching service for a 2-year period. Data were extracted from the Montefiore Medical Center's clinical information system and the Social Security Death Registry.
Results Mean LOS was lower for teaching hospitalists than for nonhospitalists (5.01 vs 5.87 days [P < .02]). The reduction in LOS was greatest for patients requiring close clinical monitoring (patients with congestive heart failure, stroke, asthma, or pneumonia) and for those requiring complex discharge planning. There were no significant differences between the groups in readmission, in-hospital mortality, or 30-day mortality.
Conclusion Teaching hospitalist care was associated with shorter LOS in patients requiring close clinical monitoring and complex discharge planning, without adversely affecting readmission or mortality rates.
Author Affiliations: Departments of Medicine (Drs Southern, Berger, Bellin, and Arnsten), Epidemiology and Population Health (Drs Bellin, Hailpern, and Arnsten), and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Dr Arnsten), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED LETTERS
Hospitalist Care and Length of Stay in Patients With Hip Fracture: A Systematic Review
Sagar U. Nigwekar, Jay Rajda, and Sankar D. Navaneethan
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(9):1010-1011.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Hospital Study Strength Principally Limited to Analysis of Specific Patient Diagnoses
William Boller, Delnora Erickson, Courtney Lawson, and Robert Patrick Lennon
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(16):1825-1826.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Hospital Study Strength Principally Limited to Analysis of Specific Patient Diagnoses—Reply
William Southern, Eran Bellin, Matthew Berger, and Julia Arnsten
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(16):1826.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Determinants of Hospitalist Efficiency: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study
Dynan et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2009;66:682-702.
ABSTRACT
A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Quality Measures in Adult Patients Cared for by Hospitalists vs Nonhospitalists
Peterson
Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:248-254.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Hospital Study Strength Principally Limited to Analysis of Specific Patient Diagnoses--Reply
Southern et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1826-1826.
FULL TEXT
Hospital Study Strength Principally Limited to Analysis of Specific Patient Diagnoses
Boller et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1825-1826.
FULL TEXT
Hospitalists And Care Transitions: The Divorce Of Inpatient And Outpatient Care
Pham et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:1315-1327.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Are inpatients' needs better served by hospitalists than by their family doctors: YES
Samoil
cfp 2008;54:1100-1101.
FULL TEXT
Les hospitaliers repondent-ils mieux aux besoins des patients hospitalises que leurs medecins de famille?: OUI
Samoil
cfp 2008;54:1104-1106.
FULL TEXT
Hospitalist Care and Length of Stay in Patients With Hip Fracture: A Systematic Review
Nigwekar et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1010-1011.
FULL TEXT
|
