You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 167 No. 21, November 26, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders
 •Lipids and Lipid Disorders
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Hypertension
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prediction Is Difficult, Particularly About the Future

Rod Jackson, MBChB, PhD; Sue Wells, MBChB, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(21):2286-2287.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

There is a substantial evidence base justifying why physicians (and patients) should manage cardiovascular risk rather than cardiovascular risk factors.1 The distinction is far more than a subtle difference in wording; cardiovascular risk factors are individually poor predictors of a patient's risk of a cardiovascular event, the only outcome that matters to patients. For most patients, their actual blood cholesterol level or blood pressure becomes clinically meaningful only when considered in combination with other risk factors and when the cardiovascular risk is calculated.2

Cardiovascular risk management decisions, whether pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic, should be determined primarily by the potential to benefit, which is directly proportional to the magnitude of a patient's predicted cardiovascular risk before treatment. A 60-year-old male smoker with a blood pressure of 150/90 mm Hg, a total cholesterol level of 200 mg/dL (to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Patient Knowledge of Coronary Risk Profile Improves the Effectiveness of Dyslipidemia Therapy: The CHECK-UP Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Steven A. Grover, Ilka Lowensteyn, Lawrence Joseph, Mohammed Kaouache, Sylvie Marchand, Louis Coupal, Ghislain Boudreau, and for the Cardiovascular Health Evaluation to Improve Compliance and Knowledge Among Uninformed Patients (CHECK-UP) Study Group
Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(21):2296-2303.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Value and limitations of existing scores for the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a review for clinicians.
Cooney et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1209-1227.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.