You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 167 No. 7, April 9, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Occupational and Environmental Medicine
 •Public Health
 •Immunization
 •Violence and Human Rights
 •Bioterrorism
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Responding to a Small-scale Bioterrorist Anthrax Attack

Cost-effectiveness Analysis Comparing Preattack Vaccination With Postattack Antibiotic Treatment and Vaccination

Brian Schmitt, MD, MPH; Deborah Dobrez, PhD; Jorge P. Parada, MD, MPH; Demetrios N. Kyriacou, MD, PhD; Robert M. Golub, MD; Rishi Sharma, MD; Charles Bennett, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(7):655-662.

Background  In 2001, a small-scale bioterrorism-related anthrax attack was perpetrated via the US mail. The optimal future response may require strategies different from those required in a large-scale attack.

Methods  We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using Monte Carlo simulation during a 10-year time frame from a societal perspective to determine the optimal response strategy for a small-scale anthrax attack perpetrated against US Postal Service distribution centers in a large metropolitan area. Three strategies were compared: preattack vaccination of all US distribution center postal workers, postattack antibiotic therapy followed by vaccination of exposed personnel, and postattack antibiotic therapy without vaccination of exposed personnel. Outcome measures were costs, quality-adjusted life-years, and incremental cost-effectiveness. The probabilities for anthrax exposure and infection; vaccine and antibiotic benefits, risks, and costs; and associated clinical outcomes were derived from the medical literature and from bioterrorism experts.

Results  Postattack antibiotic therapy and vaccination of exposed postal workers is the most cost-effective response compared with other strategies. The incremental cost-effectiveness is $59 558 per quality-adjusted life-year compared with postattack antibiotic therapy alone. Preattack vaccination of all distribution center workers is less effective and more costly than the other 2 strategies. Assuming complete adherence to preattack vaccination, the incremental cost-effectiveness compared with postattack antibiotic therapy alone is almost $2.6 million per quality-adjusted life-year.

Conclusion  Despite uncertainties about a future anthrax attack and exposure risk, postattack antibiotic therapy and vaccination of exposed personnel seems to be the optimal response to an attack perpetrated through the US Postal Service.


Author Affiliations: Medicine and Neurology Service Line (Dr Schmitt) and Department of Medicine, Hines VA Medical Center, Hines, Ill, and Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Ill (Drs Schmitt and Parada); Division of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago (Dr Dobrez); Departments of Emergency Medicine and Preventive Medicine (Dr Kyriacou) and Medicine (Dr Golub), and Division of Hematology/Oncology of the Department of Medicine, Center for Healthcare Studies, and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center (Dr Bennett), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill; and Midwest Center for Health Services and Policy Research, VA Chicago Health Care System, Lakeside Division (Drs Sharma and Bennett).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Preattack Vaccination Against Anthrax May Be Cost-effective in Certain Populations
Robert J. Hopkins, Thomas A. Waytes, and Thomas K. Zink
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(1):114-115.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preattack Vaccination Against Anthrax May Be Cost-effective in Certain Populations—Reply
Brian P. Schmitt, Deborah Dobrez, Demetrios N. Kyriacou, and Jorge Parada
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(1):115.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Recommendations for Modeling Disaster Responses in Public Health and Medicine: A Position Paper of the Society for Medical Decision Making
Brandeau et al.
Med Decis Making 2009;29:438-460.
ABSTRACT  

Preattack Vaccination Against Anthrax May Be Cost-effective in Certain Populations Reply
Schmitt et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:115-115.
FULL TEXT  

Preattack Vaccination Against Anthrax May Be Cost-effective in Certain Populations
Hopkins et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:114-115.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.