You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 168 No. 6, March 24, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Review Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Review
 •Arrhythmias
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation

A Systematic Review

Amit Noheria, MBBS, SM; Abhishek Kumar, MBBS, MPH; John V. Wylie Jr, MD; Mark E. Josephson, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(6):581-586.

Background  Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation (CPVA) has become common therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF), but results of large randomized controlled trials comparing this procedure with antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ADT) have not been published to date. We conducted a systematic literature review to assess whether CPVA is superior to ADT for the management of AF.

Methods  We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant randomized controlled trials. Data were abstracted to construct a 2 x 2 table for each trial. Recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) was considered the primary end point of the trials. The estimate and confidence interval for the pooled risk ratio of AT recurrence–free survival in the CPVA group vs the ADT group were obtained using the random-effects model.

Results  Four trials qualified for the meta-analysis. In total, 162 of 214 patients (75.7%) in the CPVA group had AT recurrence–free survival vs 41 of 218 patients (18.8%) in the ADT group. The random-effects pooled risk ratio for AT recurrence–free survival was 3.73 (95% confidence interval, 2.47-5.63). In addition, fewer adverse events were reported in the CPVA group compared with that in the ADT group.

Conclusions  We observed statistically significantly better AT recurrence–free survival with CPVA than with ADT. These results highlight the need for larger trials to determine the appropriate role for CPVA in the management of AF. Ongoing clinical trials may provide further guidance on these treatment options for AF.


Author Affiliations: Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health (Drs Noheria and Kumar), and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School (Drs Wylie and Josephson), Boston, Massachusetts. Dr Noheria is now with the Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

New Technologies in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
Burkhardt and Natale
Circulation 2009;120:1533-1541.
FULL TEXT  

Pharmacological and Electrical Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation to Sinus Rhythm Is Worth the Effort
Anter and Callans
Circulation 2009;120:1436-1443.
FULL TEXT  

Systematic Review: Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Terasawa et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;151:191-202.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Compared With Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Reynolds et al.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009;2:362-369.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Results of a Minimally Invasive Surgical Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Ganglionic Plexi Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Single-Center Experience With 12-Month Follow-Up
Han et al.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009;2:370-377.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation With Antiarrhythmic Drugs or Radiofrequency Ablation: Two Systematic Literature Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Calkins et al.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009;2:349-361.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Medical ANtiarrhythmic Treatment or Radiofrequency Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (MANTRA-PAF) Trial: clinical rationale, study design, and implementation
Jons et al.
Europace 2009;11:917-923.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cardiac magnetic resonance in the world of the cardiac electrophysiologist the road to real-time cardiac magnetic resonance.
Pandit and Marrouche
J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009;2:317-318.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation
Andrikopoulos et al.
Europace 2009;11:147-151.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

CHAPTER 29 Atrial Fibrillation
Camm et al.
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine 2009;2:med-9780199566990-chapter-med-9780199566990-chapter.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Damage Assessment After Ablation: Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Halperin and Nazarian
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1272-1273.
FULL TEXT  

Controversies in ablation of atrial fibrillation
Aliot and Ruskin
Eur Heart J Suppl 2008;10:H32-H54.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ablation Therapy for Atrial Tachycardias: Some Answers, More Questions
Journal Watch Cardiology 2008;2008:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.