You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 168 No. 7, April 14, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System, Other
 •Oncology
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Screening
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Extracolonic Findings With Computed Tomographic Colonography

Asset or Liability?

Robert H. Fletcher, MD, MSc; Michael Pignone, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(7):685-686.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) was developed as a screening test for colorectal cancer. This test detects large polyps and cancers about as well as optical colonoscopy,1 suggesting that it, like currently accepted tests, can reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. But unlike other colorectal cancer screening tests, CTC also visualizes the abdomen and lower thorax and finds abnormalities there too. Is this extra information an asset or a liability?

When it comes to incidental findings, clinicians tend to be in opposing camps. Some see possibilities for good—a glass half full. They believe that finding incidental abnormalities might well be a good thing and finding them earlier would be even better. After all, they argue, imaging detects cancers at an earlier stage, and localized cancers have a better prognosis than advanced disease. Finding and repairing aneurysms when they are asymptomatic prevents the . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Computed Tomographic Colonography to Screen for Colorectal Cancer, Extracolonic Cancer, and Aortic Aneurysm: Model Simulation With Cost-effectiveness Analysis
Cesare Hassan, Perry Pickhardt, Andrea Laghi, Daniel Kim, Angelo Zullo, Franco Iafrate, Lorenzo Di Giulio, and Sergio Morini
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(7):696-705.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Targeted, Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Whitlock et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:638-658.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Colorectal Cancer Risk: Black, White, or Shades of Gray?
Roy and Bianchi
JAMA 2008;300:1459-1461.
FULL TEXT  

Colorectal Cancer Screening on Stronger Footing
Fletcher
NEJM 2008;359:1285-1287.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.